Progress Thread Snow - 93 GT Vert. My first Ford, Mustang, convertible, ...

  • Sponsors (?)


I’m doing reading now, but is the right way to do the heater core bypass to connect the 2 heater pipe hoses? I believe I did the backyard way with the below U hose. Anyway, gonna read some more.

Valve cover all tightened down to 168” lbs.

Exhaust manifolds waiting on gaskets.

Heater pipe next. Also need to find a nut for the arp stud situation. I believe the torque for that is like 100” lbs, so I’m not too worried.

Also - I think the rest of the spark wire clips are still on the spark plug wires, lol.

IMG_2773.jpeg
IMG_2774.jpeg
 
Big thing is making sue the ECT is in the flow of the coolant as that is the most accurate reading. I know several have it set up like above but I do not know if it is 100% right tuning wise. Someone else will have to chime in on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Big thing is making sue the ECT is in the flow of the coolant as that is the most accurate reading. I know several have it set up like above but I do not know if it is 100% right tuning wise. Someone else will have to chime in on that.
I decided to keep the pipe, maybe something I can try another time. Is a pretty simple change.

That said, I’m unsatisfied with how the heat pipe is seating lower intake port. I got like 4ish threads before it was taking too much leverage to move it. I tried to cleanup the threads best I could but I don’t have a chaser or a tap of that size.
 
Is heater pipe delete common? Any drawbacks?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYecT5LFlQg

Grab an explorer gt40 heater tube and cut it down if you want to loop it like that., it mounts the sensor at the fitting, the heater tubes are rebuildable with a common O-Ring, pretty sure there's a thread or two on them here.. I need to figure one out for use on a Hiram but that's probably what I'll end up doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I decided to keep the pipe, maybe something I can try another time. Is a pretty simple change.

That said, I’m unsatisfied with how the heat pipe is seating lower intake port. I got like 4ish threads before it was taking too much leverage to move it. I tried to cleanup the threads best I could but I don’t have a chaser or a tap of that size.
Amazon has the tap and drill bit for about $10-12 1/2 npt big sob, think ford intakes are only reason I have npt taps and drills lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So I believe the stock heads had a stud front passenger which allowed the attachment of the fuel lines clip/bracket. What do people do with this when using arp bolts?

Its the (rusted) metal bracket thing which holds the fuel delivery and return lines.

1685905363084.jpeg
 
I finished 2nd in my age group in the local sprint triathlon today. Nothing better than finishing first loser. Slow start to the work.

I am test fitting the intake on, bolts are in but just ended for the test fit.

The new silicone tube I added looks like it could be a bit more snug. It’s currently resting on the valve covers. Do I need to get that a perfect fit so it doesn’t rub at all?

IMG_2779.jpeg
IMG_2780.jpeg
IMG_2781.jpeg
 
Man, if you would have never posted the pic of the bracket for the metal fuel lines I would have never known it existed. Might be why plastic lines between the metal fuel lines and those lines the bracket holds were slightly linked on my car. These are the ones I’m talking about:

IMG_1709.jpg


On the car they were slightly linked which couldn’t have been good for fuel delivery especially with the 331. It did not bother me with the 306’s but when the tuner let me know I was running out of fuel in the 5,000+ rpm range it started to bother me.

With that being said couple of threads on this very subject. These guys say F it and don’t worry about it:


This thread suggests just popping the original bolt back in and torque it up.


You could message the General and see what he ended up doing.

Again, I feel that mine not having it probably contributed to the plastic section of the fuel lines having a mild kink.
 
Last edited:
  • Hell Yeah!
Reactions: 1 user
Man, if you would have never posted the pic of the bracket for the metal fuel lines I would have never known it existed. Might be why plastic lines between the metal fuel lines and those lines the bracket holds were slightly linked on my car. These are the ones I’m talking about:

IMG_1709.jpg


On the car they were slightly linked which couldn’t have been good for fuel delivery especially with the 331. It did not bother me with the 306’s but when the tuner let me know I was running out of fuel in the 5,000+ rpm range it started to bother me.

With that being said couple of threads on this very subject. These guys say F it and don’t worry about it:


This thread suggests just popping the original bolt back in and torque it up.


You could message the General and see what he ended up doing.

Again, I feel that mine not having it probably contributed to the plastic section of the fuel lines having a mild kink.
Crazy - I did a bunch of searching for those types of threads and you found them instantly. Thank you.

Based on the feedbacks, ill prolly just leave it eliminated.

I did see lots of threads on upgraded fuel lines. They looked yummy.
 
If you can shorten the vacuum line up and it will not rest on the valve cover do it but otherwise I don’t see it as a big deal.
I forgot to order the EGR spacer / upper intake studs as 2 of mine broke. Got them and a EGR to TB gasket as the BBK only included the intake to spacer.

Its getting closer. Slowly, but closer.

And Im drunk, yay me.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Look - I love LMR more than most here, however ...

Landon at LMR (via the YT videos) is the cleanest and most put together wrench spinner I have ever seen. NTTIAWWT, but does he have a stunt double who does the actual work? I mean, I don't see a spec of grease and/or rust debris on his baby soft skin. I will definitely not let my wife watch any of his work so as to ensure she knows whose impact wrench has the most torque. Just sayin