• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

Some real competition for the Cobra

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z28x
  • Start date Start date Mar 10, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Mar 18, 2004
#41
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #41
svtguy said:
Nice engine....I really like how GM has used fake valve covers to try to make it look like it has DOHC.
Click to expand...

Nice try. I think we have had this discussion before. They cover the coil pack and valve covers to give it a clean look! Get over yourself and your little DOHC motor. If GM wanted a DOHC engine, it would be made already. Remember, GM made DOHC motor before the stang's motor came out (LT5 ZR1 Motor). They dont need to copy.
 
F

Friedchicken

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2002
495
0
0
Mar 18, 2004
#42
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #42
Uncle Meat said:
Oh god do I feel like an ass.... DOH!

U.M.
Reading comprehension by the “Evelyn Woodhead Speed Reading Course”.
Click to expand...
Sorry UM.. I should have been more clear hehe...
 
U

Uncle Meat

Banned
Jun 13, 2002
0
1
0
Prattville, Alabama
Mar 18, 2004
#43
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #43
RealQuick said:
GM made DOHC motor before the stang's motor came out (LT5 ZR1 Motor). They dont need to copy.
Click to expand...

Didn't Lotus design it, Mercury Marine assembled it, and GM funded it? The LT5 that is....

U.M.
 
S

svtguy

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2002
1,094
0
36
Calgary, Alberta
Mar 18, 2004
#44
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #44
RealQuick said:
Nice try. I think we have had this discussion before. They cover the coil pack and valve covers to give it a clean look! Get over yourself and your little DOHC motor. If GM wanted a DOHC engine, it would be made already. Remember, GM made DOHC motor before the stang's motor came out (LT5 ZR1 Motor). They dont need to copy.
Click to expand...


Umm...GM didn't have much to do the the design or the manufacturing of the ZR1's DOHC motor....as it was all out sourced.
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Mar 18, 2004
#45
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #45
Uncle Meat said:
Didn't Lotus design it, Mercury Marine assembled it, and GM funded it? The LT5 that is....

U.M.
Click to expand...

Your right. My point was they could have it in their vehicles if they wanted it.
 
S

svtguy

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2002
1,094
0
36
Calgary, Alberta
Mar 18, 2004
#46
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #46
RealQuick said:
Your right. My point was they could have it in their vehicles if they wanted it.
Click to expand...


Take a guess at how much a GTO would cost with an LT5..... $45 - 55,000 or more. So yeah it COULD have one but no one would buy it.
 

1/4 Mile Style

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
36
0
0
Mar 18, 2004
#47
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #47
Z28x said:
S/C 4.6L is a great engine.

To answer you question about HP, they said it added 116rwhp (based on 7 psi on other LS1s) I'd expect 1/4mi. times in the mid 12's
Click to expand...



Mid 12s?? I think that's more than a tad conservative. Don't know much the GTO weighs over the F-body, but if its anywhere close, than they should run low13s/ high 12s NA. I would think solid 11s would be more of a realistic guess, but whatever...

We'll just have to wait and see...



Jon
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 18, 2004
#48
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #48
02LS1 said:
Increased size?

So I guess GM should just throw the 5.7 in the garbage and start making smaller, more technologically advanced motors becuase Ford chose to do so? GM has been using the "350" for decades...it's not like they just started making them. It's worked (and still does) very well...so if it ain't broke...

You prefer the 4.6, that's fine. It's a great motor but IMO so is the LS1/LS6/LS2.
Click to expand...

Let me clarify. I am very fond of the LS1. I think it's a great engine. Ford could just as easily just go ahead and design a big displacement engine.....anyone could. I admire the fact that Ford decided to focus more on the technological aspect of making power as opposed to the size aspect. I see the 281ci. 4.6L DOHC 4V motor thats in the 01 Cobra (for example) making 270-290rwhp on average and the big 346ci. 5.7L OHV LS1's making 290-310rwhp on average. That fact that Ford makes, on average, only 20 less rwhp with 65ci. less is pretty impressive if you ask me.

1/4 Mile Style said:
Mid 12s?? I think that's more than a tad conservative. Don't know much the GTO weighs over the F-body, but if its anywhere close, than they should run low13s/ high 12s NA. I would think solid 11s would be more of a realistic guess, but whatever...

We'll just have to wait and see...



Jon
Click to expand...

The GTO's are currently running high 13's. They aren't as stout as the FBodies. I don't see it breaking into the 12's even with that blower
 

wjfawb0

Founding Member
Jun 7, 2002
929
0
0
Georgetown, KY
Mar 18, 2004
#49
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #49
I prefer a schitload of power. As long as it is fun and liveable, I'll buy it from whoever makes it, GM or Ford.
 

KnRs88

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2002
189
0
0
Chicago suburb
Mar 19, 2004
#50
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #50
RealQuick said:
Nice try. I think we have had this discussion before. They cover the coil pack and valve covers to give it a clean look! Get over yourself and your little DOHC motor. If GM wanted a DOHC engine, it would be made already. Remember, GM made DOHC motor before the stang's motor came out (LT5 ZR1 Motor). They dont need to copy.
Click to expand...

Isn't the northstar engine pretty close in design to the Ford dohc 4.6's?
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Mar 19, 2004
#51
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #51
Volldamort said:
The GTO's are currently running high 13's. They aren't as stout as the FBodies. I don't see it breaking into the 12's even with that blower
Click to expand...

The GTO's run mid 13's @ 104 all day according to the mags that have crappy drivers. Strap that blower on and that car will trap 114-115 all day long. You telling me it wont get into the 12's with that mph? I had no traction at the track and ran a 12.5 @ 114 w/2.07 60'. That GTO will put more power to the ground then I did when I went to the track.
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 19, 2004
#52
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #52
RealQuick said:
The GTO's run mid 13's @ 104 all day according to the mags that have crappy drivers. Strap that blower on and that car will trap 114-115 all day long. You telling me it wont get into the 12's with that mph? I had no traction at the track and ran a 12.5 @ 114 w/2.07 60'. That GTO will put more power to the ground then I did when I went to the track.
Click to expand...

Yeah, thats what I'm saying
 
F

Friedchicken

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2002
495
0
0
Mar 19, 2004
#53
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #53
RealQuick said:
The GTO's run mid 13's @ 104 all day according to the mags that have crappy drivers. Strap that blower on and that car will trap 114-115 all day long. You telling me it wont get into the 12's with that mph? I had no traction at the track and ran a 12.5 @ 114 w/2.07 60'. That GTO will put more power to the ground then I did when I went to the track.
Click to expand...

It's really hard to say what the car will/won't do. You have different weight, different gearing, temp, altitude... the only consitent fact we know about magasines is that they are never right... I've seen cars overrated and underrated alike. I'm sure we can put together an alogarithm for this specific car and then use the output of that SC to calculate the new times... but we need more data. Heck, that thing could be a slug without changing the internals and upping the boost... or it could run over vettes... we just don't know.
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Mar 21, 2004
#54
  • Mar 21, 2004
  • #54
Volldamort said:
Yeah, thats what I'm saying
Click to expand...

Sounded to me like you were saying it wont touch 12's even with the blower
 
R

RealQuick

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
335
0
0
MA
Mar 21, 2004
#55
  • Mar 21, 2004
  • #55
Friedchicken said:
It's really hard to say what the car will/won't do. You have different weight, different gearing, temp, altitude... the only consitent fact we know about magasines is that they are never right... I've seen cars overrated and underrated alike. I'm sure we can put together an alogarithm for this specific car and then use the output of that SC to calculate the new times... but we need more data. Heck, that thing could be a slug without changing the internals and upping the boost... or it could run over vettes... we just don't know.
Click to expand...

Who knows what ET it will run, but it will not be a slug with a blower. There is no such thing as a a blown LS1 slug, despite its weight. It will run over C5's all day, but the C6 would be a good match. Cant wait to see some numbers, and I hope Evan Smith tests the thing.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
2001 cobra ignition timing off
  • Mike3
  • Jul 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
8
Views
99
SVT Tech Forum Yesterday at 9:57 AM
manicmechanic007
M
2001 cobra coolant crossover delete
  • Mike3
  • Jul 5, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
4
Views
124
SVT Tech Forum Jul 12, 2026
Mike3
M
L
2001 cobra sequential tail lights
  • lking78
  • May 26, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
4
Views
164
SVT Tech Forum Jun 14, 2026
lking78
L
D
sad day
  • davecobra2
  • Jul 13, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
103
What is it Worth?!?!? Wednesday at 7:55 AM
davecobra2
D
C
Thanks for having me!
  • CompOGT
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
160
The Welcome Wagon Feb 1, 2026
CompOGT
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?