• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

The New Camaro

  • Thread starter Thread starter Makdaddymac
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jun 22, 2009
#61
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #61
Shaolin Crane said:
ehh i dont really care about stock numbers anyhow, i have this disease that forces me to spend absurd amounts of cash on any vehicle i own
Click to expand...

Yeah, unfortunately most of us are incurably infected with Mod Fever. The worst part is that there are new strains of this infection coming out all the time but there are no vaccines to prevent it.
Anyone who's insane enough (in a good way) to buy a new Camaro, Challenger, or Mustang definitely isn't going to leave it bone stock. After all, if you have 400+hp to begin with you'll wanna shoot for at least 500 right?
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
Jun 22, 2009
#62
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #62
Shaolin Crane said:
ehh i dont really care about stock numbers anyhow, i have this disease that forces me to spend absurd amounts of cash on any vehicle i own
Click to expand...

You musta coughed on me because I caught the same disease AAAAAHHHHH!

A week ago I rode in a new Camaro SS automatic. My buddy rented the car from the airport after he flew in. He was on the fence about buying a New Mustang GT or a New Camaro SS. He was disappointed with the new Camaro. We flogged it, brake standed it, threw it out sideways and mashed it - you name it and we couldn't get the tires to break loose spinning - forget about a smokey burnout. We played with the traction control NO SPIN! I mean we beat this thing. We were very puzzled. Now it did accelerate nice but forget burnouts of any kind atleast in the automatic car. Could the rental cars possible be "limited" due to freaks like my buddy and me flogging it? Maybe. But then i spoke with a couple of guys I know tight with 2-3 of the GM development boys that worked directly on the Camaro program. One of the guys worked in the platform packaging department. Answer i got in regards to this is due to the 100,000 mile warrantee the automatic cars have a "Torque Management System" that overides the wheel spin? Maybe you have to get a stick car for the burnouts. Boy how disappointing would that be - you buy a new SS Camaro but want an auto - get home and you can't even boil the hides?????!!!!!!

Just my 2 cents worth of experience
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 22, 2009
#63
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #63
if your buying a new Camaro SS, and you get an automatic, you deserve to never do a burnout again.

GM probly did do that "torque management system" to punish people for being vaginas and buying an auto
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Jun 22, 2009
#64
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #64
90lxcoupe said:
if your buying a new Camaro SS, and you get an automatic, you deserve to never do a burnout again.

GM probly did do that "torque management system" to punish people for being vaginas and buying an auto
Click to expand...

I would take a 5r in a new 'stang any day of the week.

2800 stall and a 4.10 gear moves them along just dandy.

I'm sure there will be a tune to overide that set up. I'm also sure someone is already working on a magic stick to help the 'Maro churn out 500ftlbs to the rear tires and before you know it, it will be a high 11 second naturally aspirated pig.
 

LB0193

Member
Dec 6, 2005
171
0
16
IL
Jun 23, 2009
#65
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #65
These new retro cars are getting old....I am sick of them....I saw a 2010 mustang at a car show the other day the thing is HUGE......I am no a fan....I will stick to my new edge and fox cars....that 2010 was parked by a fox it looked like a giant.....I am not a fan of the 05 up cars at all.....they do nothing for me....in fact all these retro cars are huge and ugly.......
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 23, 2009
#66
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #66
Saw a 2010 Mustang drive by me at dusk last night...and although I'm not a huge fan of the rear end when I'm standing there and looking at it, that LED rear end sure looked nice as he was driving by and touching the brakes.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jun 23, 2009
#67
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #67
I'd rather have a resto-mod. a termi suspension and drive train into a 67-69 fast back or LSX based drive train and suspension into a 67-68 F-body. that would be the hawtness....
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jun 23, 2009
#68
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #68
LB0193 said:
These new retro cars are getting old....I am sick of them....I saw a 2010 mustang at a car show the other day the thing is HUGE......I am no a fan....I will stick to my new edge and fox cars....that 2010 was parked by a fox it looked like a giant.....I am not a fan of the 05 up cars at all.....they do nothing for me....in fact all these retro cars are huge and ugly.......
Click to expand...

They are really no bigger than the S197, just more meat to the shoulders/higher beltline that gives it more bulk/muscle

Park one next to a Camaro or better yet a Challenger, and the Mustang becomes a micro machine.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,296
17,999
224
Massachusetts
Jun 23, 2009
#69
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #69
25thmustang said:
A G35 isn't an average sedan? I guess that depends where you live. I see tons and tons of them day in and day out.
Click to expand...


It's the next Civic i hate to say it.


The G35 boards are full of ex civic owners who toss purple HID's tacky 20" rims, fart cans and stick blue LED's everywhere on these cars. You can pick up a 2003 model for around $15K...which puts it in reach of a lot of 18-21 year olds. You get a lot of "Future turbo swap" members who don't know a think about cars but want to put a turbo on and tune it themselves.

Sad thing is with a few mods, it is a solid 13 sec car...even the 4-door.

Give it a couple years and you'll see
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jun 23, 2009
#70
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #70
QUICK91LX said:
They are really no bigger than the S197, just more meat to the shoulders/higher beltline that gives it more bulk/muscle

Park one next to a Camaro or better yet a Challenger, and the Mustang becomes a micro machine.
Click to expand...

I drove my buddies 05 GT that was stock except for a catback, the car rode and drove nice, it was smooth and pretty tight, but to me it had NO BALLS, my 09 WRX would smoke that thing... and i am not proud of that one bit. All the new cars are pigs, if they weighed 500 pounds less then it would be a different story
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jun 23, 2009
#71
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #71
90lxcoupe said:
I drove my buddies 05 GT that was stock except for a catback, the car rode and drove nice, it was smooth and pretty tight, but to me it had NO BALLS, my 09 WRX would smoke that thing... and i am not proud of that one bit. All the new cars are pigs, if they weighed 500 pounds less then it would be a different story
Click to expand...

The 4.6 3V is nutless in the low RPM's. It pulls pretty well up top, you just gotta know how to drive it.

The 09 WRX is an absolute animal. I see no shame in being (slightly) slower than a turbocharged 260hp AWD car that is much ligher. The WRX gives up 40hp on an 05-09 GT, but more than makes up for it in weight savings, instant power and AWD.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jun 24, 2009
#72
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #72
You guys think the 05 plus are that large???

LOL they are!

 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Jun 24, 2009
#73
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #73
25thmustang said:
You guys think the 05 plus are that large???

LOL they are!

Click to expand...

That '05 looks like a tank when it's next to fox , I didn't think it was that bad LOL. cool pic .
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jun 24, 2009
#74
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #74
It is a tank. Anyone who has dealt with both knows. I can say that the first time you go to wash and wax one, you realize just how much car is there!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 24, 2009
#75
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #75
Speaking from someone over 6ft, I find the restyle a welcome change. No more reclining the driver’s seat to an uncomfortable ghetto-lean to prevent banging my head on the roof liner. No more looking through the top tint of the windshield banner, just to to see the road through the windshield.

The S197 is the perfect tall person car. Yes it’s bigger, but really...who cares. It’s all in perception. It still runs circles around the previous models all the way across the board. Large sized, or not.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jun 24, 2009
#76
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #76
Gearbanger 101 said:
Speaking from someone over 6ft, I find the restyle a welcome change. No more reclining the driver’s seat to an uncomfortable ghetto-lean to prevent banging my head on the roof liner. No more looking through the top tint of the windshield banner, just to to see the road through the windshield.

The S197 is the perfect tall person car. Yes it’s bigger, but really...who cares. It’s all in perception. It still runs circles around the previous models all the way across the board. Large sized, or not.
Click to expand...

for once i can agree with you, im a large dude too and sitting in my fox is a joke, its not sitting as much as a contortionist routine, my feet are large enough when i drive they hit the dash and anthing else underneath and before the harnesses i hit my head on the roof all the time
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jun 24, 2009
#77
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #77
Shaolin Crane said:
for once i can agree with you, im a large dude too and sitting in my fox is a joke, its not sitting as much as a contortionist routine, my feet are large enough when i drive they hit the dash and anthing else underneath and before the harnesses i hit my head on the roof all the time
Click to expand...
thats why I drive a convertible
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jun 24, 2009
#78
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #78
stykthyn said:
thats why I drive a convertible
Click to expand...

yeah but not crazy about my head hanging out the top of a convertable
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 24, 2009
#79
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #79
stykthyn said:
thats why I drive a convertible
Click to expand...

That’s fine, except when the top is back up on the vert, you're loosing another inch of head room still beyond that of the hard top.

I tried running around in an SN95 convertible a while back and it was a joke. I felt like I was in a clown car. With the addition of the power seat, combined with the extra thick convertible top, I actually found it worse than my last Fox body hard top for head room....although I imaging a Fox convertible with a power drivers seat would be much the same.

With the static charge I keep getting from my head constantly rubbing against the roof liner I thought I was going to blow the thing up if I pulled into a fuel stop and stepped out into an area with gas fumes.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jun 24, 2009
#80
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #80
Both my father and brother mounted their seats on the floor board to sure that issue... They are both over 6' with taller upper bodies and with helmuts on they had the seats so far back, neither could reach 3rd gear.

The S197 is a tall persons car, although the side to side room I don't think is any larger (center console to door room that is).
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
S
  • Locked
is the five-oh a no-no aganst the new camaro?
  • samosa
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2011
stanmckinney
S
T
New To The Forums + Cross Country Road Trip + Restomod Mustang + Pics
  • taxman73
  • Jun 2, 2012
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jun 2, 2012
taxman73
T
It's Stupid Story Time again!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?