• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Too much exhaust flow = loss of power

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01mgvert
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#1
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #1
Everyone agrees that the Mustang exhaust is restrictive, whether it's the exhaust manifold, catted h-pipe, or the catback exhaust. If you eliminate some of that restriction by replacing stock parts with performance parts, you can add horsepower. What happens, however, if you replace all three components? I installed Hooker LT headers, o/r x-pipe, and Magnaflow catbacks, hoping to increase my horsepower. I gained 23 rwhp with the headers and x-pipe. But, when I traded out the stock catbacks for Magnaflows, I actually lost low-end power. Using a G-Tech, my 0-60 mph time went from 5.1 seconds to 5.6 seconds. At higher rpms, I appear to have gained power. I found a thread on stangnet that explains the physics behind this loss in power: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=458814&highlight=catalytic+converter.
 

Defleshed

Satanic Mechanic
Nov 30, 2003
10,569
1
0
In Torment, In Hell
Sep 3, 2004
#2
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #2
yalp... loss of backpressure = more high end, less low end. Just wait'll you put some aggressive cams in, that'll throw you for a loop!
 

Premium Speed

New Member
Apr 22, 2003
1,006
0
0
Houston, Texas
Sep 3, 2004
#3
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #3
G-tec's aren't very accurate unless the conditions are perfect...take it to the track

yes, you lost some backpressure and low end responce, but you made up for it on the high end(where it matters when drag racing).
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Sep 3, 2004
#4
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #4
you never want back pressure what causes a loss of low end torque is the exhaust gases slowing down. You ideally want as much flow as possible while maintaining a constant exhaust speed through the system, one reason chambered mufflers show lower power than straight through. When the exhaust gasses get to the open chambers they expand and slow down.
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Sep 3, 2004
#5
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #5
JUST PUT SOME 4.10 GEARS IN THAT WILL TAKE CARE OF THE LOW END!
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#6
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #6
jrc_03_gt said:
JUST PUT SOME 4.10 GEARS IN THAT WILL TAKE CARE OF THE LOW END!
Click to expand...

I already have 4.10s.

Don't get me wrong, I like the high-end power. But, I like the low-end power for neck-snapping take offs. The reason for my thread was to warn others about removing all restrictions from their exhaust, thus eliminating back pressure. This is beneficial only for forced air induction. For those of us who are n/a, we need some back pressure for low-end power.
 
B

blkchevyz

New Member
Sep 3, 2004
25
0
0
st charles MO
Sep 3, 2004
#7
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #7
i know this is on a camaro but here is what my car did when i open my exhaust dumps. i had two 2 1/2 dumps right after the long tube headers
http://home.earthlink.net/~blkchevyz/306hpnumbers.htm

as you can see i lost some low end and gained alot on the top end... it also moved my torque up.
 

Indiana

New Member
May 6, 2004
286
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#8
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #8
blkchevyz, I took the liberty:

 

Canuck Stang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
62
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#9
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #9
FallenPhoenix said:
you never want back pressure what causes a loss of low end torque is the exhaust gases slowing down. You ideally want as much flow as possible while maintaining a constant exhaust speed through the system, one reason chambered mufflers show lower power than straight through. When the exhaust gasses get to the open chambers they expand and slow down.
Click to expand...

Where are you getting this info from?
I think you've been sadly misled.

You're all bass ackwards...
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Sep 4, 2004
#10
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #10
Canuck Stang said:
Where are you getting this info from?
I think you've been sadly misled.

You're all bass ackwards...
Click to expand...

from physics
 

Canuck Stang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
62
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#11
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #11
From physics.....physics taught you about air flow though internal combustion engines?

Well, I think the only thing physics will tell you is that air flows faster w/ no restrictions. ie: laminar flow.

Problem is, you are talking about an *engine* here, that is a little more complicated.

Engines require exhaust gasses to be scavenged from the cylinders properly.
At low rpm, this requires a certain backpressure to be accomplished.
With a straight through exhaust, this doesn't happen until high in the rpm range.

Don't get me wrong though, the best possible HP comes from a straight through exhaust. Although, this moves your torque curve higher along in the rpm, and in the process, you lose a fair amount of low end. And, you engine may not rev high enough to take advantage of this.
 
R

Ryan L

Founding Member
Apr 15, 2001
783
0
16
St. Augustine, FL
Sep 4, 2004
#12
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #12
In the end, pick what sounds good. I have an old school h-pipe and Flows w/ the stock manifolds and I pulled close to 260rwhp with a stock motor.
 

kah9911

New Member
May 20, 2004
102
0
0
Downingtown, PA
Sep 5, 2004
#13
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #13
I plan on have the full SLP exhaust- from LT to o/r X to Loudmouth. The way I am going to get the power curve pushed back down is with the cam. It may hurt my 1/4 but the 60' will be good. Also it will be more streetable. After all where do you spend more time?
 
R

Rio96

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
99
0
0
Sep 5, 2004
#14
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #14
Backpressure increases torque.
.
However, adding, or removing pipelenght,
will have an affect on scavenging.
I suspect that people will sometimes compare:
a more or less stock arrangement, with a muff and
several feet of pipe ... to ... a cutout.
.
You're changing two things with the cutout.
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Sep 6, 2004
#15
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #15
You would think it is common knowledge:

Less backpressure = Less low end very little more top end
Normal back pressure = Good low/high end

More backpressure doesn't = More torque
No backpressure doesn't = More high end

It's all about balance.

Dual 2.25 pipes is more than enough for a N/A 4.6 under 400hp.
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
Sep 6, 2004
#16
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #16
backpressure is something you dont want unless you want a slower car.. also 0 to 60 times dont mean anything..
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
Sep 6, 2004
#17
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #17
of course you lost.. you needed to drive the car around to get it used to the change..
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Sep 6, 2004
#18
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #18
WRXracer said:
backpressure is something you dont want unless you want a slower car.. also 0 to 60 times dont mean anything..
Click to expand...

0-60 mph times are everything if you are racing street light to street light. Also, if you lose too much on the low end, you will never make it up on the top end. In the quarter-mile, you are probably running 90-100 mph. 0-60 mph is an important part of the equation. Fortunately for me, most of my recent street races have been roll-ons, 50-100 mph. The high rpm power is great for this.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Sep 6, 2004
#19
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #19
True to life example.

Took the mufflers off the other day and lined up against a guy I know. With just my dynomax mufflers we were dead even. Now that I don't have the mufflers he not only beat me off the line but I couldn't even keep up. The sound is great but the loss of power sucks. The gain is only when I get above 70 and that only helps with drag racing but not really that much.

I also noticed that the top of my 2nd gear is now 65 instead of 60. I'm know that has something to do with the straight pipes but I can't figure it out. Argue that it won't increase speed but I saw what I saw and I don't care what you think
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
Sep 6, 2004
#20
  • Sep 6, 2004
  • #20
well since I no longer street race I can care less..
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
312
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
190
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
A
1990 Ford Mustang GT catalytic convertor
  • ar_legend
  • Jul 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
872
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2024
AeroCoupe
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
153
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?