• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

took car to track with blower (vid)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FSTRDNU
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2006

FSTRDNU

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
76
0
0
Apr 29, 2006
#1
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #1
last week i slapped on a novi 1000, 30 lb injectors,c&l mas, aero fpr (42 psi) and some autolite 24 plugs (gapped at .32) and bt at 10* with stock fuel pump, and no fmu, before i went 12.9, @ 105 / 12.9 @ 108 but with the blower i i was able to get a 12.0 @ 115, launching from idle, untuned, and if i thow on my slicks, and traction bars, i know it will go 11.5,
btw , on 115k mile shortblock
is there anything that i can do to get somemore power, thats now alot of money? thanks

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/551E1A72-C28D-4555-ABA2-84E47F8BCFC1.htm
 

bdazzgt

I had to jerk off the cable to get it to stop.
Dec 27, 2005
328
0
16
Springfield MO
Apr 29, 2006
#2
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #2
sweet ass vid nice car btw
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 29, 2006
#3
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #3
Sounds like you already know what you can do. Get it tuned.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 29, 2006
#4
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #4
Wow, did someone crash into a bee's nest, sounded like an angry swarm. At least you did the stinging. Car looks good and ran even better. Congrats!
 

FSTRDNU

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
76
0
0
Apr 29, 2006
#5
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #5
thanks, but i need traction , even with 10.5 mt et streets i need traction bars, and my clutch is toast
thanks, i cant wait, to throw on slicks
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Apr 29, 2006
#6
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #6
looks like you were sleeping at the light. with a better RT, your ET should improve. with 115 trap speeds, it shows that you should go a quicker....
 

FSTRDNU

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
76
0
0
Apr 29, 2006
#7
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #7
yea, that run was bad, i had a 1.7 60ft from idle, but the next run, i cut a 1.6 60ft, witha .058 light, but car backfired, shifting into third, and ran bad, idk?
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 29, 2006
#8
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #8
From the sounds of it, you've got a very low 11 or high 10s car once you get all the "issues" ironed out. Get it tuned and get hold of your traction problems before you start looking for additional mods. After that, it'll be a matter of practice.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 29, 2006
#9
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #9
bigcat said:
looks like you were sleeping at the light. with a better RT, your ET should improve. with 115 trap speeds, it shows that you should go a quicker....
Click to expand...


Reaction time has nothing to do with the ET.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Apr 29, 2006
#10
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #10
795.0pacecar said:
Reaction time has nothing to do with the ET.
Click to expand...
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Apr 29, 2006
#11
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #11
795.0pacecar said:
Reaction time has nothing to do with the ET.
Click to expand...

yeah.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?