• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Twin Turbo Build Progress -pics-

  • Thread starter Thread starter OrangeMustangGt
  • Start date Start date Aug 11, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Next
First Prev 19 of 21 Next Last

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 12, 2005
#361
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #361
95Vert said:
I can't wait to get my turbo set-up. So much fun, I giggle like a school girl just thinking about it.
Click to expand...

ditto, man. i just wanna get my $hitty hail damage/paint out of the way. you going single or twin? custom or getting a kit? how much boost are you planning on running?
 
M

meyers2211

New Member
Sep 4, 2005
38
0
0
Lindenhurst
Oct 12, 2005
#362
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #362
my point was instead of putting heads and an intake on why not jus boost the motor to 8psi to make up for all that. Instead of having a performance motor produce 350hp on 5 psi, make a stock motor put out 350 on 8 or 10psi

cheap hp
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Oct 12, 2005
#363
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #363
wouldn't the better heads make it a lot safer? i am debating the same thing:
1) get gt40's and run 5-7lbs of boost w/out an intercool, or
2) stock heads and run closer to 10 lbs or boost w/ an intercooler

suggestions? ideas?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 12, 2005
#364
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #364
meyers2211 said:
my point was instead of putting heads and an intake on why not jus boost the motor to 8psi to make up for all that. Instead of having a performance motor produce 350hp on 5 psi, make a stock motor put out 350 on 8 or 10psi

cheap hp
Click to expand...


Because i doubt he's gonna keep his boost at only 5psi. I mean he could...but the chances are highly unlikely IMO. I say 8-12 psi is "normal" for street cars with whatever h/c/i package. Pick your poison and go with it. Im sure whichever way you go, you will be upgrading the other as time goes on. You will want more power.

Ram000 said:
wouldn't the better heads make it a lot safer? i am debating the same thing:
1) get gt40's and run 5-7lbs of boost w/out an intercool, or
2) stock heads and run closer to 10 lbs or boost w/ an intercooler

suggestions? ideas?
Click to expand...

Aluminum heads are less likely to detonate i believe. And its always "safest" to go with a intercooler and for max hp also. There is the "right" way to do things and always a cheaper route. Option #1 WITH a IC is the right way IMO but it can be done with stock heads. Plenty of guys do it. If the car has some miles on it, i would rebuild the motor and invest in some aluminum heads. Then later i would boost it. Or you could boost it now and upgrade later. Its all up to you.
 
B

BJBethel

Founding Member
Jun 17, 2000
317
0
0
Dayton, Ohio
Oct 12, 2005
#365
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #365
Just wanted to say, I started lurking on this thread today and I think I creamed myself.

That is all.
 
G

golfpro187ho

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
30
0
0
Maysville Ky
Oct 22, 2005
#366
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #366
when do we get some more vids....idlin....under the hood.....from the back....burnout...somthin....were all in suspense jus waitin
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Oct 22, 2005
#367
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #367
dude, i'm not even a 94-95 guy, but i saw this when i was clickin on 5.0 tech, and i clicked back , and just spent almost an hour reading your entire thread, and you seriously are the god damn man - i've never seen anything more awesome in my life - i thought i was doing something cool, w/ my new engine w/ a H/C/I thats all chrome or polished al, painting every peice, lol and i still don't have the right to park in the same parkinglot as you - omg - i like superchargers better, but i am convinced that turbos are among the coolest things god gave us - along w/ sex and superchargers
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Oct 22, 2005
#368
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #368
yeah, now that this thread is back up, sure you can get vids, ill get some asap(i know i keep saying that). I'm just having soo much fun driving the car, i mean.... i actually look foreward to going to work now!
 

SM0k3

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2001
580
0
16
La Palma, California
Oct 23, 2005
#369
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • #369
DAMNIT i wish i knew how to weld, i wanna do this to my stang so bad, and im not even driving it daily anymore so now would be perfect =/
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 23, 2005
#370
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • #370
SM0k3 said:
DAMNIT i wish i knew how to weld, i wanna do this to my stang so bad, and im not even driving it daily anymore so now would be perfect =/
Click to expand...
i'm sure you could figure it out. it is mostly a question of having a welder and some time to play with it.

i am not minimizing what the FabMaster G did, but lots of people know how to weld, so i am sure we can learn too.

go for it. a mig can be had at sears for a couple hundred, probably cheaper ig you shop around. if i had a garage, i'd get one and play with it after the kids went to bed.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 23, 2005
#371
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • #371
BlackVert said:
i'm sure you could figure it out. it is mostly a question of having a welder and some time to play with it.

i am not minimizing what the FabMaster G did, but lots of people know how to weld, so i am sure we can learn too.

go for it. a mig can be had at sears for a couple hundred, probably cheaper ig you shop around. if i had a garage, i'd get one and play with it after the kids went to bed.
Click to expand...



And another thing, while this is a really cool idea with really cool features(air intake in side vents ), it is not a must do on mustangs. We have plenty of room up front in the engine bay to put 1 or 2 turbos. In fact, IMO its easier than to do this setup. Much less piping and much less lines/complication with the oiling.


And call me lazy:Zip2: , , but why was this setup wanted in the first place? I think i recall something about emissions and that sort of thing. And the look under the hood maybe. I dont know...just wondering.
 

SM0k3

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2001
580
0
16
La Palma, California
Oct 24, 2005
#372
  • Oct 24, 2005
  • #372
yea im thinking of getting a mig and practicing with some old exhaust piping.....


The reason i like this setup is the sleeper look though.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 24, 2005
#373
  • Oct 24, 2005
  • #373
SM0k3 said:
The reason i like this setup is the sleeper look though.
Click to expand...


yea until the BOV goes vroooooommmm whooooooshhhhhhh
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 24, 2005
#374
  • Oct 24, 2005
  • #374
nmcgrawj said:
... We have plenty of room up front in the engine bay to put 1 or 2 turbos ...
Click to expand...
huh? it doesn't seem very spacious up there to me ...

also, i have not heard of one turbo setup in the engine bay that doesn't require removing the smog pump, which makes it illegal in places where they care about that sort of stuff.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 24, 2005
#375
  • Oct 24, 2005
  • #375
BlackVert said:
huh? it doesn't seem very spacious up there to me ...

also, i have not heard of one turbo setup in the engine bay that doesn't require removing the smog pump, which makes it illegal in places where they care about that sort of stuff.
Click to expand...


The point is that there is room to put the turbos up there. Its not like a trans am/camaro where there is literally no space to work with. Plenty of guys have them up front and will continue to have them upfront. You are acting like there is no room to work with anything. I understand if u cant lose the smog but if u can then i see no reason why not to put them up front. But thats just me.

And like i said, a emissions thing must be the other reason b/c like u said, that is the one thing that must be lost.
 
G

golfpro187ho

New Member
Oct 13, 2004
30
0
0
Maysville Ky
Nov 30, 2005
#376
  • Nov 30, 2005
  • #376
ever get any new vids??
 

dr0pt0pf0rd

New Member
Apr 10, 2005
10
0
0
Dec 4, 2005
#377
  • Dec 4, 2005
  • #377
so what was the total cost of the project?
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Dec 5, 2005
#378
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #378
Did you see this kit? http://www.ststurbo.com/mustang_installation_pics
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 5, 2005
#379
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #379
a50sn95 said:
Did you see this kit? http://www.ststurbo.com/mustang_installation_pics
Click to expand...
dang those are even farther back ...
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Dec 7, 2005
#380
  • Dec 7, 2005
  • #380
GOD DAMN! STS did a twin turbo for a Mustang!? FINALLY! I have been asking them forever
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Next
First Prev 19 of 21 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
296
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
153
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
637
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
J
For Sale 2003 mustang GT
  • jimted79
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
566
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 22, 2025
jimted79
J
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?