• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Digital Tuning Use wideband controller to....

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockyracoon
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2020
R

rockyracoon

10 Year Member
Nov 23, 2005
874
27
49
margate NJ
Jun 22, 2020
#1
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #1
Years ago I built a 4cyl turbo mustang using a computer and motor from an 87 turbocoupe. Anyway I used a wideband controller that had an analog output to replace the stock o2 sensor signal to the ecu and was able to actually change the air/fuel ratio by installing a simulated narrowband/ bias to the signal going back to the ecu thus tricking the puter into richening or leaning out the mixture. My question is can I do this for my 95 gt ?
 
Last edited: Jun 22, 2020

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
632
176
74
Jun 22, 2020
#2
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #2
I think it depends on how you do it. You definitely need cal access to the stock ECU to make it happen. The problem is that most narrow-band ECU's stop looking at the O2 sensors when they go into enrichment (open loop) at high load, and only use the adaptation values established when it runs at lambda 1.00 as a feed-forward adaptation. I don't know how you would get the ECU to modify the fueling in this situation. You could set the ECU to run closed loop all of the time and set the fueling map all to lambda 1, but then your wideband would need a speed/load based desired lambda map to target it's narrow band output in order to trim the ECU. In any case, doing this by mostly feedback control would be really sketchy.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Jun 22, 2020
#3
  • Jun 22, 2020
  • #3
Short answer, yes, the Innovate LC-2 for example (this is what I run) has a secondary analog output that can be configured to simulate narrow-band switching. It's not a pure 'simulation' or tricking the ECU (where I think @WhiteCobra95 is heading) but rather just putting out a real narrow-band O2 sensor signal from the wideband controller.

With that said, feedback on some other forums seems to indicate the wideband may be a little more slow-to-switch than a true narrow-band. So you may get some issues with how the self-learning function of the ECU interprets the results of that mildly-delayed signal. There's also warmup-time on a wideband (also on a narrow-band) and the potential for it to go out-of-calibration, so in general the recommendation is to run a regular narrow-band to the stock ECU. A stock sensor and a bung are pretty cheap. And if you're getting a tune, both banks can be run off of a single O2 (if you're so-inclined).
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Jun 25, 2020
#4
  • Jun 25, 2020
  • #4
I did this years ago with a lc2 and tweecer. Can't remember how but it is possible. I'm thinking it was something I did on the tune. Single wideband placed in downpipe after turbo.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,109
234
Box behind Walmart
Jun 25, 2020
#5
  • Jun 25, 2020
  • #5
rockyracoon said:
Years ago I built a 4cyl turbo mustang using a computer and motor from an 87 turbocoupe.
Click to expand...


Not without help. That ECU only recognizes whether the narrowband sensor is operating within range.

Mustangless said:
I did this years ago with a lc2 and tweecer. Can't remember how but it is possible. I'm thinking it was something I did on the tune. Single wideband placed in downpipe after turbo.
Click to expand...


This is the right idea. I wonder if there is a more modern equivalent to the TwEECer these days? @a91what I know there are plenty of EEC replacement options these days, how about Piggy-back systems?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Jun 25, 2020
#6
  • Jun 25, 2020
  • #6
Noobz347 said:
Not without help. That ECU only recognizes whether the narrowband sensor is operating within range.




This is the right idea. I wonder if there is a more modern equivalent to the TwEECer these days? @a91what I know there are plenty of EEC replacement options these days, how about Piggy-back systems?
Click to expand...
We are still stuck with the same ones from years ago, Tweecer and Moates are the only two that come to mind for the DIYer
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Jun 25, 2020
#7
  • Jun 25, 2020
  • #7
Mustangless said:
I did this years ago with a lc2 and tweecer. Can't remember how but it is possible. I'm thinking it was something I did on the tune. Single wideband placed in downpipe after turbo.
Click to expand...
You can set the number of HEGO's and the assignment of the sensor to each cylinder in the tune. The output will still need to be an analog, narrow-band-voltage signal so you're not technically driving the eec with a wideband. You're driving the eec with a single simulated-narrow-band output. Not trying to be pendantic, it's just not possible for the eec to accept a wideband signal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
Fox 4 Cyl to V8 Swap Info Thread
  • Matt01
  • Jul 12, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2023
Robinson
R
N
Electrical Can you use the 4cyl electric fan controller in a 5.0 swap?
  • notch.nouveau
  • Apr 18, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 19, 2020
notch.nouveau
N
On3 Performance Install Tips
  • flstang65
  • Dec 15, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
11K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2023
atomicfox236
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?