• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Vac advance, ported or manifold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cdaniel
  • Start date Start date Aug 19, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#81
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #81
Max Power Your highest amount of ported vacuum is just off throttle under acceleration said:
Still wrong but getting closer to right.
Click to expand...
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#82
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #82
Max Power..................... just off throttle under acceleration..................[/QUOTE said:
WTF does this mean?


I know what under acceleration means, but what does the "just off throttle "part mean? If you are off throttle, does that mean you are unaccelerating? How can you do both at the same time?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?????
Click to expand...
 

crushnut

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
870
0
0
Oregon
Aug 24, 2004
#83
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #83
wow this thread needs to be locked
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#84
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #84
Yeah, I haven't been the most clear. Just off idle is what I meant.

Hang a guage. Read a link. Until then, quit being a prick.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#85
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #85
Max Power said:
Yeah, I haven't been the most clear. Just off idle is what I meant.

Hang a guage. Read a link. Until then, quit being a prick.
Click to expand...


Hey, I gotta be me. Your discriptions about this issue have lead to some of the miss information in this thread. You are just now starting to explain yourself only after being questioned. I accept that ported vacumm goes down in the upper reaches of the rpms. But, I say again that ported vac increases up to a certain point and that point or points under that rpm range is where the majority of us do our driving. So, ported vacumm is benificial to fuel economy and performance.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#86
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #86
crushnut said:
wow this thread needs to be locked
Click to expand...


Why? We are learning everything we never wanted to know about vacumm.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#87
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #87
I posted this on the first page of the thread:

""""Actually, vacuum advance is pretty high at freeway cruising, as is vacuum. When you mash the throttle, timing retards a little cuz vacuum drops. Prevents detonation during higher cylinder pressures of WOT driving. Think of vacuum advance as fine economy tuning for mechanical advance. Vacuum allows more advance during light throttle cruising, which improves economy. When you mash it, it goes away. In the days of just mechanical, it would just run a little more retarded all the time.

It's a fairly fine tuned system, and anytime you make any engine mods, you alter it's effectiveness. That's why so many people with heavily modified engines just go to straight mechanical. Economy is less of a concern and it's hard to make mechanical and vacuum advance work perfectly together on your own.""""

While I occasionally stumble on my descriptions, I don't think it gets much clearer than that. Off throttle and off idle are commonly used terms that mean the same thing in the trade. The rpm that vacuum declines on ported turned out to be a little higher than I thought, after I hung a guage to look. At least I hung a guage, which is almost as difficult as clicking on many of the links provided.

I never questioned the benefits of vacuum advance, I just questioned that ported vacuum increases across the entire rpm range. I have no idea where you got that idea that I questioned the benefits of vacuum advance through a ported source.

That is counter to how vacuum advance is designed. To have it continue to increase over an the entire rpm range would result in far too much advance during high cylinder pressure situations, like WOT or high rpms, which would lead to engine damaging detonation.

I have tried to be civil through this discussion. I would appreciate the same consideration.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#88
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #88
Civil???? Sooooooooooo, you didn't mean the prick thing? Cool.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#89
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #89
That's all you got to say? LOL!

As you say, it was just you being you.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#90
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #90
Max Power said:
That's all you got to say? LOL!

As you say, it was just you being you.
Click to expand...



Carefull, or I'll come over there. What do you want? I don't accept that you were being civil, I think YOU were and still are being a prick. I confused you and bull99999999999999999999 earlier, but I make no mistake now.

Goodbye.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#91
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #91
Sigh.....

I give up.
 

crushnut

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
870
0
0
Oregon
Aug 24, 2004
#92
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #92
Max Power said:
Sigh.....

I give up.
Click to expand...

Your never gonna win against him, i learned that a long time ago
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#93
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #93
crushnut said:
Your never gonna win against him, i learned that a long time ago
Click to expand...


It's not about winning. We're done. Give it a rest.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#94
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #94
LOL, so it's not just me, huh?

 

crushnut

New Member
Apr 27, 2003
870
0
0
Oregon
Aug 24, 2004
#95
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #95
Ozsum2 said:
It's not about winning. We're done. Give it a rest.
Click to expand...

Come on You know you like to do it
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#96
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #96
Max Power said:
LOL, so it's not just me, huh?

Click to expand...



No, most old timers on here have had to suck it up when faced with newbs and the like. It comes with the turf. We usually either resolve the issues or just decide to give it a rest. Fortunately, I have a good relationship with Stangers in the know.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#97
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #97
crushnut said:
Come on You know you like to do it
Click to expand...


Yea I suppose. When my "buttons" get pushed, I feel the need to "reset" them.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 24, 2004
#98
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #98
Sorry, I bought my first Mustang 26 years ago. Hard to think of myself as a noob.

Good that the Stangers in the know love you.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 24, 2004
#99
  • Aug 24, 2004
  • #99
Max Power said:
Sorry, I bought my first Mustang 26 years ago. Hard to think of myself as a noob.

Good that the Stangers in the know love you.
Click to expand...



Yea, "All we need is love..........." It is spelled ........."newb" Think of it this way, I am spreading the love by helping you increase your post count.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 25, 2004
#100
  • Aug 25, 2004
  • #100
It's spelled either way you cretin!

See, I cun speel C-R-E-T-I-N!!!!

Maybe someday I can reach the 6000 post mountain top and experience euphoria! Post count is what it is all about baby!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Vacuum advance with two ports
  • 7991LXnSHO
  • Oct 8, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
895
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 9, 2021
7991LXnSHO
need engine advice
  • bacfire
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
882
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 20, 2008
D.Hearne
D
D
Vacuum advance.. timed/ported or manifold
  • DJCarbine
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 19, 2006
180 Out
1
G
I can't seem to solve this engine problem!
  • Guitylerham
  • Aug 2, 2007
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Aug 4, 2007
Guitylerham
G
M90 root blower how to info
  • 1987LXragtop
  • Jan 7, 2011
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
8K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2011
1987LXragtop
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?