• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Went to see Reagan today

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Jun 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
K

KnownRider

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
29
0
0
Washington, DC
Jun 10, 2004
#21
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #21
You should read Ellison's book. It really is classic. It is assigned in business schools to exemplify management and decision making.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jun 10, 2004
#22
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #22
Ever read "Reagan's War" by Schweitzer?
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jun 10, 2004
#23
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #23
KnownRider said:
The great majority of historians view the crisis as JFK's finest moment. The agreement to remove the Jupiters was done to allow Kruschev to back down gracefully. Saving face is very important when the world is watching. Kruschev was not demanding anything and got nothing. JFK was in firm control of the situation by then.

Kruschev was given to making grandiose demands and then backing down. Berlin was his first. Cuba was his second. There was not to be a third because he had succeeded in committing political suicide. If it was such a victory, why did the Politburo yank him rather than reward him?

Great topic for a Mustang site! A pleasure talking with you. Take it easy.
Click to expand...


Diplomatically it was a GREAT move. Problem is that it was a WAR! You don't act diplomatically in a war, you go for the throat! To me Kennedy's finest hour was tax cuts and his support of Civil Rights.

To quote Alexander Hamilton, "A nation that can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one." REgan used that also. As far as I am concerned, KEnnedy made a bad move. He should have takent he risk and demanded Kruschev gank the missiles. We had the advantage and Krushev wasn't going to be the first one to press the proverbial button.
 
K

KnownRider

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
29
0
0
Washington, DC
Jun 11, 2004
#24
  • Jun 11, 2004
  • #24
Diplomatically it was a GREAT move. Problem is that it was a WAR! You don't act diplomatically in a war, you go for the throat! To me Kennedy's finest hour was tax cuts and his support of Civil Rights.

Going for the throat meant mushroom clouds over Miami and Washington.

Kennedy did indeed enact an impressive tax cut. As for Civil Rights, he was too timid to take on the Dixiecrats. The Voting Rights Act, which had languished under him, was actually promoted and passed by LBJ.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jun 11, 2004
#25
  • Jun 11, 2004
  • #25
KnownRider said:
Diplomatically it was a GREAT move. Problem is that it was a WAR! You don't act diplomatically in a war, you go for the throat! To me Kennedy's finest hour was tax cuts and his support of Civil Rights.

Going for the throat meant mushroom clouds over Miami and Washington.

Kennedy did indeed enact an impressive tax cut. As for Civil Rights, he was too timid to take on the Dixiecrats. The Voting Rights Act, which had languished under him, was actually promoted and passed by LBJ.
Click to expand...

I'd say that may be a drastic thing to say. I think Lemay's idea (which was thought to be suicide) of saying "Get them out or we will take them out." would have been the right move. It was strong and decisive. Look at the blockade. They tried to be diplomatic with that! It was a blockade but no no, that's to strong of wording, let's call it a "Quarantine." Kennedy was a charismatic guy (not that I'd know first hand, he preceded my time obviously) but a poor leader. He supported good things, but didn't know how or when to be strong. I don't think Nixon would have been much better and LBJ wasn't impressive on many fronts either.

Look, Kruschev was weak and Kruschev knew as well as anyone else that Kennedy was going to press the button first, but he'd glady press it second. He knew that he'd die jsut as quickly as Kennedy would if he pressed it. I'd say that while it was the closest to nuclear war we've ever been, and it was "close," it wasn't going to happen without Kruschev being disposed of rather quickly.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

It's Stupid Story Time again!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 12, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 14, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
K
I feel bad for this guy!
  • Kevins89notch5.0
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 10, 2007
Daggar
D
Dealer denying warranty coverage
  • Skud
  • Aug 2, 2006
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2006
blackfang
news update for me...hope you want a story...
  • MI95Cobra
  • Jul 31, 2007
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 4, 2007
5.0_GT_kid
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?