• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

What intake for a 347?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrueBlue95GT
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2005

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Jul 12, 2005
#1
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • #1
I'm in the middle of picking parts for my 347 and I'm wondering which manifold you guys would recommend? Is the victor too radical?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 12, 2005
#2
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • #2
The victor is one of the best intakes out there for a nice 347 thats gonna see a bit more rev's (under 7000) Just be sure the ports match and mill the intake as needed to fit. The little BS involved with the victor intake is what caused me to not use it. I went with the slightly smaller tfs-R since its more of a direct fit. I would have rather used the victor but its too involved. No egr, no pcv (gotta rig it up) may need milling to fit heads and ports are larger than some heads and the heads will need port matching. Thats what turned me off.

To answer your question, absolutly NOT is it too much. Your building a 347, not a 289
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Jul 12, 2005
#3
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • #3
Well I've already gotten rid of my pcv so that's all good. How does it have an affect on egr when thats on the throttle body?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 12, 2005
#4
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • #4
Egr goes from ports in the head up through a port in the manifold and into the egr spacer and egr valve. Then when the egr valve opens it puts egr back into the manifold.

Why did you ditch your pcv, are you running an evac set up?
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jul 13, 2005
#5
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #5
Holley and RPM II are also nice options for a 347.

RC
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jul 13, 2005
#6
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #6
I'm not trying to be an ass or offend you when I say this...

If you have to ask if a Victor is "too big," you shouldn't be using it.

Because of it's short runners, cam timing is critical. There is tons of airspeed in a long(er) runner manifold such as a Holley or RPM II (as Rob mentioned). There is not "tons" of airspeed with a Victor - it needs to be "created" with cam timing.

For a regular old hydraulic roller street 347, the Holley or RPM II is plenty, and much more friendly towards different company's OTS cams.

Joe
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jul 13, 2005
#7
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #7
Joes95GT said:
I'm not trying to be an ass or offend you when I say this...

If you have to ask if a Victor is "too big," you shouldn't be using it.

Because of it's short runners, cam timing is critical. There is tons of airspeed in a long(er) runner manifold such as a Holley or RPM II (as Rob mentioned). There is not "tons" of airspeed with a Victor - it needs to be "created" with cam timing.

For a regular old hydraulic roller street 347, the Holley or RPM II is plenty, and much more friendly towards different company's OTS cams.

Joe
Click to expand...

That IS a pretty importan factor to mention. I do think though that anyone who is getting a 347 built and doesnt spend $100 more for a custom grind is...........(you fill in the blank)
RC
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Jul 14, 2005
#8
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #8
I'm definitely planning on a custom cam, but I have to get everything together first before they grind a cam. Does anybody think that paying 1800 for shortblock assembly is too much?
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Jul 14, 2005
#9
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #9
TFS R hands down!

Troy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
109
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
M
Gt40p headers
  • Mike3
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
691
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
Blackhawkxx
D
Exhaust set up
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
510
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?