• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Why do we need the PCV system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueOvalStangGT
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2006

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Dec 4, 2006
#1
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #1
It seems like it just is a nuisance, why shouldnt I just put a breather on the back of the intake and my valve cover?
 

MadPony

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
22
0
0
Dec 4, 2006
#2
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #2
Well, 2 reasons, even well built stock motors get blowby to a small percentage, as there is an end gag in the rings. During the compression cycle some of the gasses that get blown by the rings is fuel and air. These gasses build up in the crankcase, and could potentionally explode :-(.

The second reason that after the fire shortly before the downstroke you will get blowby of exhuast gasses. This depending upon load can be a considerable amount which can build up pressure in the crankcase.

These gasses get vented into the bottom part of your engine. The PVC system is designed to extract these gasses and safely put them back into the intake, to be re-burned, and also to relieve any pressure buildup.

Hope this is accurate enough, and explains the process. You can however use a vacuum pump hooked up the the PCV valve as some racing engines do, but they are around 250 bucks.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Dec 4, 2006
#3
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #3
I agree. The two biggies that were hit upon are that the PCV is closed (emissions friendly) and that the PCV actively scavenges the corrosive blowby gasses, where as breathers passively vent when pressure builds.
 

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Dec 10, 2006
#4
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #4
i'm in the same boat now, i'm torn between ditching my pcv and keeping it. i get oil in my intake and yes the lower intake baffle is in place and i'm using a home depot oil separator inline with the pcv and intake. the pcv system, even though it is efficient, seems to be more of a headache than its worth on cars like mine that are running superchargers. i currently am using a breather on my passenger side valve cover so i'm thinking of ditching the pcv and adding another breather either to the other valve cover or the lower intake where the pcv went. my car only gets driven about 2,000 miles a year and the oil is changed twice, maybe 3 times during that period. so i'm not really worried about the oil getting contaminated and the motor was just built last year so i shouldn't have any major blowby issues to deal with. so, to ditch it or not?
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Dec 10, 2006
#5
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #5
i'll answer the question with a question.

Do you like to smell oil mist?

i dont. keep the pcv, it can be made to work quite easily and even if your boosted it is foolproof.

you want a negative pressure in your crankcase fo maximum ring seal and power anyway
 

95cobraguy

Member
Dec 23, 2005
637
11
19
Concord, NC by way of LI, NY
Dec 11, 2006
#6
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #6
GreenMustangGt said:
i'll answer the question with a question.

Do you like to smell oil mist?

i dont. keep the pcv, it can be made to work quite easily and even if your boosted it is foolproof.

you want a negative pressure in your crankcase fo maximum ring seal and power anyway
Click to expand...
i dont think anyone would like that smell, where would this mist come from? i have an open breather in my passenger side valve cover (trick flows) and i have no oil coming out of the breather. these covers come without baffles so i had one welded in and its doing a great job of keeping the oil from splashing up and soaking the breather. i was thinking of doing the same to the driver side cover and ditching this pcv.
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Dec 11, 2006
#7
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #7
im running a breather on the drivers valve cover (thats where my filler neck is) and pcv to the lower intake. I have heard that a combination of a closed and opened system is bad

right now i have oil that blows out of my breather and dipstick. im not sure if it is because of of all the nitrous i used to have (wore the rings down) or if that by having a closed and opened pcv system blew it up.

next year, im going to have a fitting welded on my drivers side filler neck so i can run an entirely closed system and ditch the breather.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Vacuum
  • ProTechAutoServices
  • Aug 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 2, 2026
Noobz347
9
Unknown engine tick
  • 94 Daily
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
176
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
N
Edelbrock 1405 Setup
  • nathantaylor200
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
276
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
nathantaylor200
N
M
Electrical 93 5.0 No Injector Pulse
  • machinermac
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 1, 2026
Willybill32
M
Resolved PCV Tube and Valve Cover Breather Hole Locations
  • MDrisc
  • Sep 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
MDrisc
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?