• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Why does everyone on here think.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter super302
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#1
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #1
Why does everyone think that convertables are soooo much heavier than every other stang out there. According to the book "mustang 5.0 technical reference and performance handbook" (the god of all mustang books "
It says:

GT hatch manual =3191 pounds
GT hatch auto =3251
GT vert maual =3327
GT vert auto =3442

So the manual vert only weighs 136 pounds more than the manual hatch. That equals about .15 or less in the quarter mile. Sorry for going on an on but everytime someone sees i have a vert, they think i'm gonna run like 2 seconds slower, WTF. According to this wonderful book, my car should run LOW 14's completely stock!
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Jul 6, 2004
#2
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #2
Exactly right. Everyone seems to think that they weigh a ton more, but even autotrader says a vert only weighs like 150 lbs more than a hardtop. I like convertables
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 6, 2004
#3
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #3
I'm not exactly sure why everybody thinks the verts weigh so much more...the only ones that seem to think that are the ones that believe every pound counts... ...there the ones that vacuum out their car before they head to the track...

I remember some members saying the vert would run a second slower with more mods than a coupe with slightly less mods...

Oh the unintelligent

EDIT: super302 - "All Eyez on Me"
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#4
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #4
Exactly, people are saying i'll run like mid 15's stock, at least someone besides me knows the truth
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#5
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #5
Exactly, people are saying i'll run like mid 15's stock, at least someone besides me knows the truth , plus, verts are better looking and get a TON of looks.(not that i don't like the hatch or notch)
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#6
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #6
sorry, sort of a double post.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 6, 2004
#7
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #7
super302 said:
plus, verts are better looking and get a TON of looks.(not that i don't like the hatch or notch)
Click to expand...

Now thats an opinion
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#8
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #8
5spd GT said:
EDIT: super302 - "All Eyez on Me"
Click to expand...


, thought i was the only one left who listens to him
 

MustangPunk302

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
1,051
0
36
West Michigan
Jul 6, 2004
#9
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #9
It's not really the weight as much as body rigidity for alot of people. Even with a good cage and through the floor sub-frames. It still won't be as solid as a hatch or notch with the same mods... I do love my vert though..
 

BAFMustangGT

New Member
Jul 3, 2004
204
0
0
Rochester, NY
Jul 6, 2004
#10
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #10
For every 100lbs, you looe like 2 or 3 tenths or something in the 1/4 mile...i think its something like that.

Personaly, i hate them. I dont know why. I dont like to have wind in my hair, and i have bad luck and **** always gets in my eyes.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 6, 2004
#11
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #11
BAFMustangGT said:
For every 100lbs, you looe like 2 or 3 tenths or something in the 1/4 mile...i think its something like that.

Personaly, i hate them. I dont know why. I dont like to have wind in my hair, and i have bad luck and **** always gets in my eyes.
Click to expand...

1/10th = 100lbs or vice versa...just a general rule...

I'll put it this way...if a vert pulled up beside me with the exact same mods to his car...I wouldn't count him out...thats for sure...I would know that it would be a good race...
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 6, 2004
#12
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #12
actually, mustangpunk302, b/c of the large rear lift-gate, mustang hatches have much less torsional rigidity than notchbacks or convertables, this is known to develop cracks in the c-pillar area. and, the t-tops causes loss of significant structural unit-body stiffness.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jul 6, 2004
#13
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #13
I think the major bitch about the vert is the need for a roll bar at 13.99.. of course, I haven't had anything said to me at the track...
mine weighed 3375 with me in it.. but that was with almost no gas..
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
Jul 6, 2004
#14
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #14
Another thing to consider is options.....air, power options etc the more options, the more the car will weigh. My 85 has tilt and a sunroof, other than that no options. Got to like that. The wireing in the dash is said to weigh 30lbs.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Jul 6, 2004
#15
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #15
I have all three, convertible, hatch, and coupe. To say a convertible is more rigid than a hatch is absolutely foolish. I know what you mean about the quarters buckling, but where a hatch has those panels, a convertible has NOTHING! So how can you say it is more rigid? The convertible has the least rigid body of them all. Don't get me wrong, I like them all. My convertible ran 15.0 with 3.73's and exhaust. Granted it is an auto, so I wouldn't expect more than 14.7 with a manual with similar mods. Again, I like all of them, but the convertible is slower. Not by much, but slower.
 

RiceCooker5.0

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
28
0
0
Naples,FL
Jul 6, 2004
#16
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #16
I personally don't think verts are slower. Specialy if its got a 5spd. I want a vert just cuz i think getting a tan while driving is so cool plus. I havent meet a girl to this day that dosent dig a vet,they think ther sexy


edit: R.I.P 2PAC 1 LOVE, ther iS a heven for a G do ya thang boy.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 6, 2004
#17
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #17
Notch is most rigid, hatch is in the middle, t-tops next and convertible last. The point about options is worth noting - they make a difference. And typically, verts came with more options than, say, notches - not always, but most of the time. So when you start comparing a stripped down notch to a loaded convertible - in the foxes you can get to a 250 lb difference; it's even greater in the sn95 models as the design criteria for torsional rigidity was taken to the next step - they reinforced the verts more to try to make up for whacking the top off.
 

stang976

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
853
0
0
Westchester, NY
Jul 6, 2004
#18
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #18
yea i guess a vert is equivalent to a coupe with a fat chick in the passenger seat.
 

RiceCooker5.0

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
28
0
0
Naples,FL
Jul 6, 2004
#19
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #19
stang976 said:
yea i guess a vert is equivalent to a coupe with a fat chick in the passenger seat.
Click to expand...


/more like a regular size girl in the trunk, actually that whould help get traction cuz the extra lb's on top of the rear end would help with tracton
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Jul 6, 2004
#20
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #20
Well some of you are taking one way opinions. For example, Michael Yount posted that a stripped down notch and a loaded vert would be a 250 lb difference. That is probably true, but you can do the same thing the other way, and say a stripped down vert would weigh about the same as a loaded notch...

You can make any car heavier or lighter than another.

(Not trying to start a fight or make someone mad)
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Project 2nd Chance Pony - Status Update
  • JKWilson61
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2020
JKWilson61
Install Daytona Sensors CD-1 Ignition Mustang Fox SN95
  • revhead347
  • Sep 21, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
W
-Classic-Fit Big Pony Polo shopping online
  • wvowor09
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
2K
Regional Forums and Event Information Mar 15, 2011
wvowor09
W
Fox Talk's Popular Threads (miss An Old Stickied Thread? Find It Here.)
  • NIKwoaC
  • Oct 18, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
21K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2016
SF Lex
Aaarrrghhh! Another trip to the parts store!
  • Husky44
  • Apr 18, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 20, 2009
1987Rock
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?