• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Why I Should Not Do A Solid Lifter High Compression Motor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noobz347
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Apr 27, 2016
#41
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #41
I like this thread . I had considered doing a fairmont along the lines of the build your talking about .

427w
Solid roller
Tfs high port
Turbo 400 3 speed
Street/strip deal with bare essentials . One day I suppose . In the mean time I approve of this thread. And cool ranch locos tacos . Carry on .


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers while my auto correct makes me seem illiterate
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Boosted92LX

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,766
6,932
214
SW Houston
Apr 27, 2016
#42
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #42
TOOLOW91 said:
I like this thread . I had considered doing a fairmont along the lines of the build your talking about .

427w
Solid roller
Tfs high port
Turbo 400 3 speed
Street/strip deal with bare essentials . One day I suppose . In the mean time I approve of this thread. And cool ranch locos tacos . Carry on .


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers while my auto correct makes me seem illiterate
Click to expand...
I had this exact setup, except AFR 225s in the first Hoopty. Some days, I regret selling that car. It was naaaaaaaaaaaaasty on the street for the little while I got to drive it.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,108
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 27, 2016
#43
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #43
I will look for and bring up pics of the car this is going into for the folks that haven't seen it yet.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Boosted92LX

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Apr 27, 2016
#44
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #44
hoopty5.0 said:
I had this exact setup, except AFR 225s in the first Hoopty. Some days, I regret selling that car. It was naaaaaaaaaaaaasty on the street for the little while I got to drive it.
Click to expand...
I'd love to do it in a box top fairmont . Or a gutted mark 7 lsc . Something different
 
Reactions: stykthyn and hoopty5.0

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Apr 27, 2016
#45
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #45
Noobz347 said:
I will look for and bring up pics of the car this is going into for the folks that haven't seen it yet.
Click to expand...
Yes inquiring minds , or should I say simple minds like mine love pictures. [emoji23]
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Apr 27, 2016
#46
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #46
I'm a little late to the party here.

Piston speed mang.

(Rpm x stroke)/6

Keep it under 7k for stock build, as the number climbs so does the quality of the parts. A 302 can safely spin 7k with supporting hci on a stock bottom end.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Apr 27, 2016
#47
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #47
Piston speed wont really be an issue with any of the stuff we are talking about here.

Another thing id say is a must for a heavily street driven solid roller combo is the lightest valvetrain parts you can afford and steel rockers.

TOOLOW91 said:
427w
Solid roller
Tfs high port
Click to expand...
If i could do it again i would probably do a edelbrock 7721 head if the budget is right. Ceralli engines in jersey has a nice CNC program for that head.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 27, 2016
#48
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #48
Ok, part two.

The coffe cans that were the Pistons yielded a street friendly 9.5:1cr. The only thing spinning in the front was a wp, and an alternator.
When the 460 came apart the C4 that was behind it was opened for the first time in over 90 passes.

I built the c4 for the thing. Found an almost impossible to find 385 pattern bell for it, and rebuilt the c4 myself using the typical hypo mods( Kevlar bands, Alto red clutches, 6 clutch low reverse drum) B&M shift kit, and a stupid cheap 10" 3500 stall converter. The transmission was a literally being torn apart by the torque , that was trying to drive all of the internals out the ass of the transmission. There was so much thrust bearing wear, several of them were paper thin. I ended up converting to a 1.76 geared glide, but the 466 that had been the staple for the previous three years had given its last. The new engine was an equally cheap 496 stroker, using 440 Chrysler rods. It went 6.0 getting the snot sprayed out of it, when one of the junk assed Chrysler rods decided it had had enough and left through the pan rail.

After that, I returned to a Windsor based build, but nothing that followed was done so cheaply that yielded so much fun.
 
Last edited: Apr 27, 2016
Reactions: RaggedGT and Boosted92LX

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 27, 2016
#49
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #49
madmike1157 said:
Ok, part two.

The coffe cans that were the Pistons yielded a street friendly 9.5:1cr. The only thing spinning in the front was a wp, and an alternator.
When the 460 came apart the C4 that was behind it was opened for the first time in over 90 passes.

I built the c4 for the thing. Found an almost impossible to find 385 pattern bell for it, and rebuilt the c4 myself using the typical hypo mods( Kevlar bands, Alto red clutches, 6 clutch low reverse drum) B&M shift kit, and a stupid cheap 10" 3500 stall converter. The transmission was a literally being torn apart by the torque , that was trying to drive all of the internals out the ass of the transmission. There was so much thrust bearing wear, several of them were paper thin. I ended up converting to a 1.76 geared glide, but the 466 that had been the staple for the previous three years had given its last. The new engine was an equally cheap 496 stroker, using 440 Chrysler rods. It went 6.0 getting the snot sprayed out of it, when one of the junk assed Chrysler rods decided it had had enough and left through the pan rail.

After that, I returned to a Windsor based build, but nothing that followed was done so cheaply that yielded so much fun.
Click to expand...

And this monster had cast iron factory 429 heads on it?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 27, 2016
#50
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #50
TOOLOW91 said:
I'd love to do it in a box top fairmont . Or a gutted mark 7 lsc . Something different
Click to expand...
A stripped mark 7 would be tits. I've always had a soft spot for those.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 27, 2016
#51
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #51
Boosted92LX said:
And this monster had cast iron factory 429 heads on it?
Click to expand...
Yeah, the smaller thunder jet passenger head as opposed to the CJ head. I still ground the therm actor bump out of the exhaust port, and did some mild pocket porting ( ala Hoopty).
The 496 got upgraded to cast iron CJ heads, but I'm not sure they worked any better. A 460p.i. head is also a good junker alternative, but I'm sure they're all almost non-existent now days.

I'm not sure if the " Stupid Story" that revolves around that engine, and the campaign I waged with it against the demon that wears a bow tie is published here, but it involves hitting the wall, totaling the mustang, and retrofitting all of the drivetrain into the third of 6 fairmont(s) that got built by me, to include the current one.
 
Last edited: Apr 27, 2016

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Apr 27, 2016
#52
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #52
I get the super cheap builds that last for a while, but they are not my cup of tea.
90 passes sounds like a lot to some possibly, but I had more than that running sportsman my first year, and I didn't make every race.
It seems many of the stories of cheap thrown together stellar performers have similar a fate, when folks are honest.
I appreciate your honesty.
At the other end of the spectrum;
Guy I know well, friend if you will, he and I used to race with nearly every weekend. He built a solid roller naturally aspirated Dart 347 back before folks started the 363 craze. All top notch machine work, top notch internals, quality heads, carb, worked over C4 and it all sits in a 79 pace car. (I'm sure I can get details if anyone really needs them) Same shop that built his motor later built mine... one of the reasons I chose that shop is because of the following...
His car has been running 10.teens @ 130mph for 13 or more years... in crappy Phoenix AZ air. It's a solid 9 second car in mine shaft that is the north-east. It's got a little more in it, but he was not shelling out the $ in safety to run 9's (chassis certs, cage certs, chute, comp license etc).
I bet over a 5 year period we probably made 6 passes per track outing, 25(or more) weeks out of the 52 weeks in a year. It's very safe to say the car has well over 1000 passes on it.
He still runs it (not as often as we used to), and the car is still dead reliable and consistent running 10.teens and bringing home the goods in the local bracket series.

Like I said, I get the super cheap builds, but I'm more of a commitment guy.
I'm not judging which way is better/worse, right/wrong... either way done well are very impressiv to me.
To each his own.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Davedacarpainter

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 27, 2016
#53
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #53
cleanLX said:
I get the super cheap builds that last for a while, but they are not my cup of tea.
90 passes sounds like a lot to some possibly, but I had more than that running sportsman my first year, and I didn't make every race.
It seems many of the stories of cheap thrown together stellar performers have similar a fate, when folks are honest.
I appreciate your honesty.
At the other end of the spectrum;
Guy I know well, friend if you will, he and I used to race with nearly every weekend. He built a solid roller naturally aspirated Dart 347 back before folks started the 363 craze. All top notch machine work, top notch internals, quality heads, carb, worked over C4 and it all sits in a 79 pace car. (I'm sure I can get details if anyone really needs them) Same shop that built his motor later built mine... one of the reasons I chose that shop is because of the following...
His car has been running 10.teens @ 130mph for 13 or more years... in crappy Phoenix AZ air. It's a solid 9 second car in mine shaft that is the north-east. It's got a little more in it, but he was not shelling out the $ in safety to run 9's (chassis certs, cage certs, chute, comp license etc).
I bet over a 5 year period we probably made 6 passes per track outing, 25(or more) weeks out of the 52 weeks in a year. It's very safe to say the car has well over 1000 passes on it.
He still runs it (not as often as we used to), and the car is still dead reliable and consistent running 10.teens and bringing home the goods in the local bracket series.

Like I said, I get the super cheap builds, but I'm more of a commitment guy.
I'm not judging which way is better/worse, right/wrong... either way done well are very impressiv to me.
To each his own.
Click to expand...

I know people who have literally spent over 20k on an engine from a reputable race engine builder, and scattered it down the track.. I can only imagine how sick they were. The bottom line is, it doesn't matter how "committed " you are, chit happens. Spending a ton of cash doesn't mean your motor is going to last forever if you beat on it. I've had slapped together junk that SHOULD have exited the car, and I sold it because i wanted something new, after beating on it for a couple of years ruthlessly. I can see your point, and there is something to the addage "You get what you pay for," but there's another that goes "More bang for the buck." I think anyone who does this thing we do can expect to lunch an engine anytime.. But if you are going to risk it, why wouldn't you want to kick the guy's ass next to you, and still have money in your pocket to celebrate while making your house payment?

To each his own I guess..
 
Reactions: cleanLX

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Apr 27, 2016
#54
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #54
TOOLOW91 said:
I'd love to do it in a box top fairmont . Or a gutted mark 7 lsc . Something different
Click to expand...
Oh, a fairmont, here we go......
 

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Apr 27, 2016
#55
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #55
Fine I'll be different....351C with a C-4... with 2 kits there I said it.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,733
3,175
203
Taylorsville ky
Apr 27, 2016
#56
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #56
My Vote.........



 
Reactions: Noobz347

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Apr 27, 2016
#57
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #57
Davedacarpainter said:
Oh, a fairmont, here we go......
Click to expand...
I basically had one . No place to put it I lost the other garage I had so I had to stop the project .
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Apr 28, 2016
#58
  • Apr 28, 2016
  • #58
TOOLOW91 said:
I basically had one . No place to put it I lost the other garage I had so I had to stop the project .
Click to expand...
Nothing wrong with a fairmont. They just lead to really, really long builds is what I've noticed.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,108
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 28, 2016
#59
  • Apr 28, 2016
  • #59
When I was much much younger, my parents had an 81 Granada. All of the thoughts and dreams I had when I discovered that it was the same platform as the Mustang GT. lol
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 28, 2016
#60
  • Apr 28, 2016
  • #60
Noobz347 said:
When I was much much younger, my parents had an 81 Granada. All of the thoughts and dreams I had when I discovered that it was the same platform as the Mustang GT. lol
Click to expand...

I had a buddy with a 4 door 80 something granada in high school with the i6. We begged him to do the 5.0 swap and offered to help, but he rebuilt the 6 to be different, complete with cam and holley carb intake.. He got passed by turtles.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Tuesday at 4:25 PM
FastDriver
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Engine compartment Detail tips and pointers...
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 19, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 26, 2019
Rdub6
  • Locked
SOLD 2010 Kawasaki Z1000
  • XStang302x
  • Mar 9, 2016
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
0
Views
2K
Other Classifieds Mar 9, 2016
XStang302x
I Guess I Cant Ever Let Them Go...
  • BlownStangGT
  • Sep 21, 2014
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
899
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2014
Mattstang04
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?