• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

WINGS vs. WINGLESS

  • Thread starter Thread starter 04ShadowGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Ibeyorsuperman

Member
Apr 21, 2003
123
0
16
Ogden, Ut.
Apr 4, 2004
#21
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #21
I prefer wing. Just makes the car look soo much more aggressive
 

drexebo

New Member
Mar 3, 2004
99
0
0
Apr 4, 2004
#22
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #22
it's almost the anti-ricer aspect that makes the wingless look so appealing... if you hang around these mustang owners enough you begin to equate big wings with riced out 4 bangers. I guess the thought of being able to whoop most 4 cylinder imports without "all" the crucial added benefits and horsepower provided by gigantic spoilers is part of the mystique that draws me toward the wingless stang.
 

CMilStang

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
26
0
0
Apr 4, 2004
#23
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #23
I can see how the stock spoiler looks like "rice", oh never mind no I can't ... there are a lot of cars without spoilers, they are called family sedans. The stock spoiler on a Mustang looks a lot better than without. It makes it look more aggressive like previously stated instead of like a 1989 Cavalier.
 

Slapyo

Admin Dude
Feb 8, 2003
1,068
1
49
Anaheim, CA
Apr 4, 2004
#24
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #24
i like it with the stock spoiler, but the wingless stangs do look pretty smooth.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 4, 2004
#25
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #25
drexebo said:
nah... keep it on there... wingless is for pussees.
Click to expand...


04ShadowGT said:
I think the Cobra trunk lid looks much, much better, aswell.
Click to expand...

Don't go all wingless, go 03 Cobra wing atleast. Wingless looks like poo.

CMilStang said:
From the pictures posted, looks like the wing wins ... you could always take the hood scoop off to fit your pancake look better.
Click to expand...


Ibeyorsuperman said:
I prefer wing. Just makes the car look soo much more aggressive
Click to expand...
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#26
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #26
It doesn't do anything. Looking aggressive doesn't make it a 12 second car.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Apr 4, 2004
#27
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #27
well it shaved some weight off from your car..

but then again.. if you already have 12 second car.. then it wouldn't matter at all..

It just something different.. all mustang looks good to me.. (except some which are just horrid.... )
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 4, 2004
#28
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #28
GinoGT said:
It doesn't do anything. Looking aggressive doesn't make it a 12 second car.
Click to expand...
neither do rims
TIRES might but rims don't do crap
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#29
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #29
JonJon said:
neither do rims
TIRES might but rims don't do crap
Click to expand...

Weight reduction (if you've got $$$). Smaller rims for more sidewall = more straight line traction. Bigger rims with less sidewall = more responsive handling.

Not exactly as profound as a 100 shot, but compared to a piece of plastic bolted to the trunklid...........it's just sitting there.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 4, 2004
#30
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #30
GinoGT said:
Weight reduction (if you've got $$$). Smaller rims for more sidewall = more straight line traction. Bigger rims with less sidewall = more responsive handling.

Not exactly as profound as a 100 shot, but compared to a piece of plastic bolted to the trunklid...........it's just sitting there.
Click to expand...

take out your passenger seat too then
it's just sitting there
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#31
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #31
JonJon said:

take out your passenger seat too then
it's just sitting there
Click to expand...



Sure, why not? Passengers might not like it though.

Ah, screw 'em.
 

drexebo

New Member
Mar 3, 2004
99
0
0
Apr 4, 2004
#32
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #32
GinoGT said:
It doesn't do anything. Looking aggressive doesn't make it a 12 second car.
Click to expand...

exactly... what is the true purpose of a spoiler in the first place? increased stability at very high speeds? how often do you really need the downforce of the stock wing in everyday driving? I say the stock wing is unnecessary weight added to an already dead sexy car.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#33
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #33
drexebo said:
exactly... what is the true purpose of a spoiler in the first place? increased stability at very high speeds? how often do you really need the downforce of the stock wing in everyday driving? I say the stock wing is unnecessary weight added to an already dead sexy car.
Click to expand...

It probably doesn't even provide any downforce. Maybe 20lbs at 150mph if you're lucky.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 4, 2004
#34
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #34
GinoGT said:


Sure, why not? Passengers might not like it though.

Ah, screw 'em.
Click to expand...
on passengers
I have no friends

drexebo said:
exactly... what is the true purpose of a spoiler in the first place? increased stability at very high speeds? how often do you really need the downforce of the stock wing in everyday driving? I say the stock wing is unnecessary weight added to an already dead sexy car.
Click to expand...
I think I'll take my rear bumper off tomorrow. it'll look better than a wingless Stang too!!

 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Apr 4, 2004
#35
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #35
Devoid
 

Defleshed

Satanic Mechanic
Nov 30, 2003
10,569
1
0
In Torment, In Hell
Apr 4, 2004
#36
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #36
personally i think the stock wing on my 02 gt compliments my evil sounding exhaust for a more overall intimidating look. it would look too 'old lady' car without it.
 

Silver Bullet GT

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
506
0
0
Orlando, FL
Apr 4, 2004
#37
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #37
I like wingless too. Gives it a cleaner body line overall and a nice wedge shape.
 

Dr. Wu 2000

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
554
0
0
Eastern, Pa.
Apr 4, 2004
#38
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #38
The 99-2000 wings are just horried. Everything after that are fine. I would
probably try moving it further back first before removing it all together
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Apr 4, 2004
#39
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #39
I think it depends on the wing and the overall look of the car. I don't like the 99-00 wing. I don't really like or dislike the 01-04 wing. I keep it bedcause it is there.

I can't stand any wing that sticks up higher than say ~4". WTF is the point. then again I am more old school than new school. I don't waste money on wings and plasic. I treat this car just like any other. wheels, paint, suspention and motor. when I restore a classic car I don't look for a bunch of plastic or bing wing for it. To me the age of the big wings and body's kits just make cars look wierd. they look like a toy or something. I can't belive the number of "pimped" out 15sec+ cars there are on the road.

I feal sorry for anyone who needs a wing to make there car "agressive" you exhaust and your timslip is supposed to do that.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 4, 2004
#40
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #40
Dr. Wu 2000 said:
The 99-2000 wings are just horried. Everything after that are fine. I would
probably try moving it further back first before removing it all together
Click to expand...

they're what??
i call
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
W
Hopefully, I'm doing this right.
  • Wireflight
  • Apr 10, 2021
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Aug 4, 2021
nickyb
S
2013 GT - Random Misfiring + Random Failures & Faults
  • Skyler Wilson
  • Feb 16, 2020
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
6K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2022
Russell Anguita
R
Too sweet 98 .....w.t.f..
  • Sycophuk
  • Jan 24, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
886
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 24, 2020
Sycophuk
Progress Thread Project 2nd Chance Pony - Status Update
  • JKWilson61
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2020
JKWilson61
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?