• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

00 GT trans vs. 03 GT trans.

  • Thread starter Thread starter senecagreen
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2004
S

senecagreen

New Member
Jan 1, 2003
11
0
0
Dec 11, 2004
#1
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #1
I had a 2000 GT with the 5 speed and now have a 2003 GT with the 5 speed. The rear end ratio is the same at 3.27. The big difference I noticed was that the 03 has a lower 1st gear than the old mustang and that the first 4 gears seem to be lower overall and close ratio compared to the old mustang I had. And there is a big jump to 5th compared to the old one.

As far as driveability I think that the 00 GT was a harder to take off smoothly in 1st gear but required less shifting since it was wider ratio through the gears and they were spaced more evenly together. I also think it shifted a little better than the new one but I think the biggest reason for that is that the 1st 4 gears in the 03 are a lot lower.

I think Ford played around with the ratios in the new one to get better acceleration in the first 4 gears and then put that big jump in there to 5th for the gas mileage. I know that the 00 GT didn't seem to pull as hard in 3rd as the 03 GT seems to.

My wife hates all the shifting she has to do with the 03 but I actually prefer this transmission since my priority is acceleration and I think the newer trans gets more out of what you have than the old one did. I don't mind the big jump from 4th to 5th. I just rev it out a little further in 4th before shifting. 1900 rpm in 4th is 45mph compared to 70mph 1900 rpm in 5th. That's a big jump in ratio.

I feel like this 03 trans is a little notchy in the first two shifts but I think it might be because of the really low ratios 1st thru 3rd. I just think Ford was trying to get more performance when they switched to this trans. I like it but it just boils down to whether you can put up with all the shifting you have to do around town.

Anyway, it is good to have a mustang again. They are great cars.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 11, 2004
#2
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #2
T-45 vs. T-3650
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,254
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Dec 11, 2004
#3
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #3
The '00 has a T-45 transmission and the '03 has a t-3650 trans

The ratios for the T-45 are:
1 - 3.37
2 - 1.99
3 -1.33
4 - 1.00
5 - 0.67

The ratios for the '03 T-3650 are
1 - 3.38
2 - 2.00
3 - 1.32
4 - 1.00
5 - 0.62

The first 4 gears are very similar. I doubt you would really notice much difference. The main difference is that in 2003 Ford switched to a 0.62 Overdrive on the 3650 down from a 0.68 Overdrive used on the 01-02 T-3650.

The newer t3650 is a stronger trans rated at 360 ft-lbs of torque while the older t-45 was rated at 325 ft-lbs.

The t-3650 has a synchro design flaw that makes the first 2 shifts very notchy. This is why a lot of people don't really like the 3650. There is a 50+ page thread stuck to the top of the tech forums outlying the 3650 issues and the TSB associated with fixing the notchy shift problems.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Dec 11, 2004
#4
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #4
We have both and I think the 3650 is much better than the T45 - shifting the T45 is extremely vague compared to the 3560. And, knock on wood, no issues associated with the TSB on the 3650.
 

ToplessStang

Member
Mar 7, 2004
591
0
17
Montreal, Canada
Dec 11, 2004
#5
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #5
twogts4us said:
We have both and I think the 3650 is much better than the T45 - shifting the T45 is extremely vague compared to the 3560. And, knock on wood, no issues associated with the TSB on the 3650.
Click to expand...


There's nothing like owning two GT's with diffrent parts on them for a fair comparison. Thanks for your input .
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Dec 12, 2004
#6
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #6
How much more then the 350 trq can they take? im assuming thats fly wheel? I have 293 rwtrq..that puts me pretty close to the rated limit at the flywheel..
Mike
 
C

CrazyHorn

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
184
1
0
Gatineau
Dec 12, 2004
#7
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #7
Is the t45 have any problems like the 3650 got, and can we put the t45 in the 2002-2004 models ??
 
S

senecagreen

New Member
Jan 1, 2003
11
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#8
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #8
Thanks for the actual numbers on the gear ratios. It feels like more of a difference than the numbers imply.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 12, 2004
#9
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #9
Probably the longer overdrive on the 3650 just made you think that the gears are steeper (1-4) than they actually are...

Your 03 Gt may just be a tick quicker (tad bit higher compression) and plus possibly a different owner on the 00 or 03 (depending if you bought them new)...and the performance can vary on cars depending on how it was taken care of...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
458
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
J
Reduced power in 1st and 2nd gear
  • jimted79
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
311
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 25, 2025
Noobz347
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
312
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
387
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
599
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?