• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

03 front, SVO rear brake questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter montegoman351
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2018

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 11, 2018
#1
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #1
So I have a Lincoln Mark VII with the rear discs, seems to be a fairly common swap back in the day among fox owners. My air ride is going out so I am converting to coils, all SN95 front components, and 03 Cobra front brakes. I already plan on the '93 booster due to the sheer weight of the car, but am stuck when it comes to master cylinder sizing. I was thinking surely somebody here could shed some light on this and help me decide.

Thanks!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2018
#2
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #2
Mark 7's have hydroboost setups. Typically those offer more boost than vacuum boosters so I wouldn't change that out just yet.

There's no ideal MC here as your setup never came factory on a car. You'll need to do a little math to figure what is the best to use.

So your stock setup would be:
SVO calipers: 73mm piston
-8370mm^2 for 2calipers
SVO REAR calipers: 54mm piston
-4580mm^2 for 2 calipers

Giving you 12,950 square inches of slave piston surface area as a stock Mark 7 setup


Now, you've changed to this
99-04 COBRA 40.5mm pistons
-5152mm^2 for 2 calipers
SVO REAR calipers: 54mm piston
-4580mm^2 for 2 calipers

Now giving you 9732 square inches. If you ran your stock 1 1/8" MC, you'd have a hard pedal.

So lets look at the 94-95 GT setup which uses a 1 1/16" MC which is the next smallest size down.

94-98 GT/V6 calipers : 66mm piston
-6842mm^2 for 2 calipers
94-04 rear calipers all : 38mm pistons
-2268mm^2 for 2 calipers

That's 9110 square inches of total piston surface area using that 1 1/16 MC.

That's not too far off from the setup you would be running. I'd leave the MC alone for now and try this MC instead. Of course, undure if it will physically bolt to the Mark 7 hydroboost setup. I'm assuming yes? Not a common brake setup you are going with here, so you might have to play around with it


My info came from here if you want to play around with numbers a bit yourself
https://www.stangnet.com/mustang-fo...onversion-upgrade-thread.801400/#post-8075734
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 11, 2018
#3
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #3
Now it has the Teves ABS circa 1980 something. Its gone out. Parts are made of unobtainium and the system, quite frankly, sucks.

From a little research I have done, the '93 Cobra R came with Mark VII rear brakes and an earlier version of the twin piston calipers, all with a 1" master.
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 11, 2018
#4
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #4
So, by those calculations, a 1" Cobra master would net me a 15.2:1 ratio braking. Center line of the 13-17 desired ratio.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Apr 11, 2018
#5
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #5
montegoman351 said:
Now it has the Teves ABS circa 1980 something. Its gone out. Parts are made of unobtainium and the system, quite frankly, sucks.

From a little research I have done, the '93 Cobra R came with Mark VII rear brakes and an earlier version of the twin piston calipers, all with a 1" master.
Click to expand...

Correct, but the 91-92 mark 7 brakes used on the 1993 cobra R used 45 mm rear pistons and 38mm 2-piston front calipers with the 1" master

99-04 Cobra front brakes are 2-piston 40.5mm calipers and the 84-90 mark 7 rear brakes are 54mm. Your working with a bit more piston surface area hence the 1 1/16" recommendation

What year Mark are you working with exactly? I'm assuming a few things here so I want to understand what you have. Do you have the 54mm or 45mm rears?
 
Last edited: Apr 11, 2018

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 11, 2018
#6
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #6
92 Mark VII
 

montegoman351

Member
Jan 12, 2007
169
1
18
Apr 11, 2018
#7
  • Apr 11, 2018
  • #7
So that combo work out to 14.5:1 by my calculations. I hate a soft brake pedal and a soft clutch lol. I think the 1 1/16" would work best. Thanks for the help!
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Apr 12, 2018
#8
  • Apr 12, 2018
  • #8
montegoman351 said:
92 Mark VII
Click to expand...

Roger that. Then you'll have to disregard some of the info I gave as it pertained to the 54mm rears. 1 1/16" is what I'd try out. Good luck.
 
Reactions: montegoman351
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
508
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
R
Brake Master Cylinder replacement steps for 2016 S550?
  • Reybeast
  • Dec 16, 2024
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
525
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Dec 21, 2024
89ripper
T
Another front brake upgrade question
  • Texas275
  • Nov 9, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
244
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Nov 9, 2024
LILCBRA
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
722
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?