• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

'05 aftermarket/mod speculations in here

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangtrooper97
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 8, 2004
#21
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #21
and it looks to me like you might still need to weld that bent piece to the muffler...
 

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 8, 2004
#22
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #22
mmm...I love louvers...forget who posted em (the one that posted a LOT of photoshopped pics) put some louvers on the 05...looks badASSed to me
 

Enzora

The member formerly known as Nazgul
Jun 11, 2003
87
0
0
Chapel Hill, NC
Jan 8, 2004
#23
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #23
Bullitt rims will definitely be popular on this style, as well as an aftermarket hood. Other aftermarket mods I foresee are wing and fog light delete on the GTs. They look so much cleaner without the lights in the grille. Gives it a cool Bullitt look. I'd like to see a bumper that integrates the fog lights without combining them with the turn signal lights, too.

I also wouldn't be surprised to see a full rear-end kit to change the taillights either. Several people don't seem to like the rear very much as is.
 
B

BigBlockStang

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
50
0
0
Jan 8, 2004
#24
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #24
Ford said the engine is designed to run on 87 octane fuel. So one of the biggest bangs for the buck. Would be a timing adjuster for it. Then you can bump up the timing to run on 93-94 octane. Which may be worth quite alot. I know with the old 5.0 I could chase down cars, of the same year, that hadn't had there timing advanced.
 
R

Ron Jeremy

New Member
Nov 13, 2003
747
1
0
Hollywood, California...I live next door to Jenna
Jan 8, 2004
#25
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #25
Add the 1967-1969 Shelby Cobra taillights as a part that can be available for the 2005+ Mustang.
 

V8Venom

Founding Member
Mar 30, 2001
214
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Jan 8, 2004
#26
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #26
kirkyg said:
http://www.cdw27.org/stang/05MUST57_HR.jpg

Theres the drivetrain intake and exhaust all showing with the shell of the car removed.

if it wasn't for those damn mufflers behind the axle

btw, the cats are either 2 integrated cats or 1 cat / exhaust pipe...which is good.

kirkyg
Click to expand...

What is the disadvantage of having the mufflers behind the axle?
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Jan 8, 2004
#27
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #27
Yes i think the gas tank is now in the way of where the mufflers used to be. But you can always have the mufflers lowered to fit underneath i would guess. Its REALLY going to suck having your gay fart can mufflers sticking out the back. Painting them i dont think will make it look good enough. Maybe an aftermarket body kit would allow it to be hidden.

I know that 2 chambered flowmasters will be going on for sure so they will take up some space (if/when i get one).

kirkyg
 

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 8, 2004
#28
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #28
V8Venom said:
What is the disadvantage of having the mufflers behind the axle?
Click to expand...

some people think it is very un-mustang-ish.
that and you will probably see a few 5" honduh fartcans stickin out the back unfortunately
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Jan 8, 2004
#29
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #29
zenboy99 said:
Anyone have any ideas/thoughts on how "tweaked out" this engine is? With a 9.8:1 compression ratio, it seems like big boost isn't possible. I'm just trying to think how much horsepower you could gain with the usual bolt-ons, exhaust, pulleys, throttle bodies, inlet pipe, etc. Has Ford released cam specs at all yet?
Click to expand...

Ok, where's 351CJ hiding? He had some good thoughts on this a while back in another topic but I couldn't find them.
 

Donny

Something about a big schlong...I can't remember.
Founding Member
Feb 10, 2002
669
1
39
The PoorHouse
Jan 8, 2004
#30
  • Jan 8, 2004
  • #30
Someboby needs to make an aftermarket hood like the one on the 69 shelby that has the three vent holes in it for the new Stang, it would be so sweet!!!
I would post a picture but this new SN attachments thing really sucks!!!!!!!
I also can't wait too see what Saleen or Roush has planned for it!!!!!!

Donny
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Jan 9, 2004
#31
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #31
Actually an easy fix can be made by aftermarket factorys for the mufflers. One that comes to mind quickly is SLP with their loudmouth exhaust. For mufflers they use long sleek ones that could be used either after the axle or perhaps squeezed next to the driveshaft so that you could run tailpipes behind the axle.
 

billetunderwear

I've posted way more than my fair share of pointle
20+ Year Stangneter
May 14, 2002
1,148
0
36
Rohnert Park, Ca
Jan 9, 2004
#32
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #32
how about 'vette style exhuast?
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jan 9, 2004
#33
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #33
BigBlockStang said:
Ford said the engine is designed to run on 87 octane fuel. So one of the biggest bangs for the buck. Would be a timing adjuster for it. Then you can bump up the timing to run on 93-94 octane. Which may be worth quite alot. I know with the old 5.0 I could chase down cars, of the same year, that hadn't had there timing advanced.
Click to expand...


Don't get your hopes up on this one. The 4.6L 3 valve uses a new engine control system that (if its like what is implemented on the LS & T-Bird) has a knock sensor and software that automatically advances the timing as far as possible, That is a static timing adjuster will probably do little or nothing.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Jan 9, 2004
#34
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #34
66Satellite said:
Ok, where's 351CJ hiding? He had some good thoughts on this a while back in another topic but I couldn't find them.
Click to expand...

I wasted too much time on Sunday & Monday tracking down all the new Mustang info, so I've been catching up and have not had time to spend here.

You guys are going to have to come to grips with the fact that since the 3V engine has 40 more HP some of the tweaks that were easy to do with the old 2V engine are already incorporated in the 3V to get some of that 40 HP.

To look at some specific items:

1. 9.8:1 compression ratio - This is NOT an issue. The were able to raise the compression ratio and keep the it set up to run on 87 octane because the 3V engine has the spark plug located close to the center of the combustion chamber this gives more complete buringing of the A/F mixture so a higher compression ratio can be used. I also think the the central spark plug location reduced the tendency for the plug electrode itself to be the starting point of pre-ignition. Other factors in the ability to use a higher compression ratio are most likely the new PCM system that automatically adjusts the timing to the maximum allowable. So the bottom line is I don't think that the 9.8:1 CR itself will effect the ability to put a S/C on it, but the new PCM system could be a major stumbling block. Your run of the mill street corner Mustang tuner may not be able to do much tuning your 05 Mustang. You'll probably have to wait for Ford Racing, Roush, Saleen or someplace like that to come out with SC kits.

2. If the new PCM system automatically optimizes timing, the easiest performance boost may be to put 91 Octane in it. I'd guess 5 HP or so.

3. Exhaust - This will probably be the second easiest performance mod. X pipe up to 10 HP, Mufflers larger pipes maybe another 5 HP.

4. Pullies - Unknown until we really see what Ford has already put on the engine.

5. Throttle Body - Probably nothing. If the 3V has 57mm TB's like on the Bullitt, they 2 x 57s flow over 1.5 times the air as the single 65 mm. Twin smaller TB's should also give slightly better response so I'd guess new TB's would be a waste of money.

6. Inlet pipe / air filter / air box - From first view it looks like some improvements could be made, but since the inlet is so short gains would most likley be less than what's possible on the 99-04. I'd guess 2 - 5 HP max.

7. This one should be good news. Looking at the chassis photos, and based on the Mustang should be using the new PCM system, I'm guessing that the 2005 Mustang will be using the new T/C system that the LS & T-Bird uses. In this system the speedometer & odometer comes from one of the wheel sensors. So this means - When you change the rear end gear the speedometer & odometer will still read correct! However if you change the tire diameter it will not read right unless someone is able to come up with a box that changes the pulse count.
 

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 9, 2004
#35
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #35
hmm...with the TB's in the front like that, you might see a few decent ram air hoods...I know its not a big deal but still...

I like te way the engine looks..all sexy like
 

MustangGT01

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2001
109
0
0
Unemployment, Ohio
Jan 10, 2004
#36
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #36
I'd change out the front bumper, rear tail lights, add the scoops to the quarter windows (already drive a 89 vert visability isn't an issue), different rear bumper, exhaust swap, XM Sat Radio, find something to get rid of that god awfull alluminum dash, and for pete's sakes rims that don't look like something ripped off from a Puff Daddy concert. Hell, at the ratings for power I'd settle for a v-6 if the new engine doesn't sound like a tin can in a food processor. After all the dang law around here make damn sure ya do the speed limit.
 

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 10, 2004
#37
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #37
um...isn't the aluminum trim just an option? and I don't think the wheels are too bad...woiuld you rather have plain jane black steel wheels? didn't think so
 

MustangGT01

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2001
109
0
0
Unemployment, Ohio
Jan 10, 2004
#38
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #38
If the aluminum trim is just an option that's fine. I like a simple interior that flows nicely. Aluminum dash doesn't fit the bill for me personally. As for the rims I've yet to see a style yet that really impressed me. The ones I have seen look exactly like I mentioned... something stolen at a Puff Daddy concert. Bling bling ain't something I like in my diet either.
 
S

Sir Hacksalot

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2001
363
0
0
Ankeny, IA
Jan 10, 2004
#39
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #39
stangtrooper97 said:
Guys, now that we know alot more about this thing, what are gonna be some parts that manufacturers are gonna come out with for it? Obviously springs, exhaust, shifters, wheels...but what else? What would you like to see available?
Click to expand...

I imagine a Pro50, Triax, Kirban shifter won't be too long in the making...those will be out quickly.

If I were buying one of these things tomorrow, the first few things I would do would be gears, exhaust, shifter, and maybe work out some sort of home made induction kit. If it is a sub-frame car, I don't care how rigid they make it, I will definitely be adding sub-frame connectors.

As for appearances, I don't think I would do much to the car except maybe lower it a bit, and find some seriousl cool rims and tires...I am thinking some 18" Halibrand III's in that matte finish with some serious rubber in the front and back.

I figure once the warranty runs out, the blowers will be well developed by then, and an intercooled Kenne Bell pushing about 10-12 lbs of boost would be pretty sweet.

Sir Hacksalot
 

siege

New Member
Feb 23, 2003
651
0
0
Peoria, AZ
Jan 10, 2004
#40
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #40
" Available authentic aluminum panels spanning the dashboard are particularly eye-catching, as are prominent dual chrome-ringed gauges that cap an all-new technology." which means its an option. I've also seen a few pics of the interior without the aluminum.

wonder how long it will take for some aftermarket cams to come out. I'm not too up to date on the 4.6, but its still tough to find cams isn't it?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
331
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
120
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
167
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?