Befast said:I must be getting old because I can't make out clearly what the HP/TQ is..
B.
Scott_B said:wow does the torque ever fall off on these cars in the upper rpms!
TomServo92 said:Does anyone have a stock '04 GT dyno sheet to compare to the '05? That's the comparison I'd like to see. We know peak HP/TQ is better on '05 but I'm curious how the curves compare.
seriously. wtf is up with that??romans8:28 said:ouch......... nothing on top
351CJ said:Nice dyno comparison.
05 45 more HP & 32 more lb ft, nice!
HP doesn't start rolling off until 6,000 RPM on the '05, vs 5,200 for the '04.
I bet cams will do wonders for the '05 - 3V. Keep in mind the cams are lifted out of the F-150 engine, so they're not designed for high end power. Based on the head flow #'s (link was posted here a couple months ago) the 3V heads should be good past 6,500 RPM.
OK aftermarket companies. Who's going to be the first to offer 3V cams?
Scott_B said:But look at the torque! at 6G its less then 125 ftlbs. i hope that has to do with the TB issue.
Scott_B said:But look at the torque! at 6G its less then 125 ftlbs. i hope that has to do with the TB issue.
kirkyg said:no its not...read the right side of the graph for the torque number...left side for hp.
kirkyg
oilypushrod said:the graph is surprising b/c it looks like HP peaks at 4500rpm then totally dumps after 5k.
kirkyg said:no its not...read the right side of the graph for the torque number...left side for hp.
kirkyg
kirkyg said:no its not...read the right side of the graph for the torque number...left side for hp.
kirkyg
Scott_B said:wow does the torque ever fall off on these cars in the upper rpms!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?