• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

05GT DYNO NUMBERS!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter meist@steeda.ca
  • Start date Start date Nov 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

meist@steeda.ca

New Member
Dec 18, 2003
41
0
0
Toronto
Nov 15, 2004
#1
  • Nov 15, 2004
  • #1
Well, today was the day to strap one of these bad boys on the rollers.

After a 1.5hr drive to the dyno and NO cool down time the car put down 262rwhp/289rwtq

After a cool down of about 20min, the car put down 265rwhp/292rwtq. After this pull, I yanked the Air Silencer (which is pretty skimpy to start with) and the car made 266rwhp/297rwtq

These car's run PIG RICH and there is easily another 20-25rwhp and about 10-15rwtq in this beast. These cars get better and better every day.

The car had 325km on the odometer at the time.

Tuned numbers to come in a week or so....just waiting on some software updates.

The printer at the dyno ran out of ink, so as soon as I can get back there I will post the sheets.

We are the first in Canada to get our hands on one of these bad boys. We have made the quickest 2v's, 4v's and soon to be 3v's in Canada :ca








 

NotoriousGT350

Founding Member
Apr 3, 2001
891
0
17
Lubbock, TX
Nov 15, 2004
#2
  • Nov 15, 2004
  • #2
congrats and can't wait to see the sheets. Great pics by the way.
 
J

just some guy

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2002
723
0
0
FL
Nov 16, 2004
#3
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #3
thats a big switch from the 300+ everyone said they would put down before they came out...you know...saying they are underrated and all.
 

M1Rifle

New Member
May 23, 2004
137
0
0
Nov 16, 2004
#4
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #4
just some guy said:
thats a big switch from the 300+ everyone said they would put down before they came out...you know...saying they are underrated and all.
Click to expand...

265 rwhp IS at least 300 crank. Your point is.... ?
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Nov 16, 2004
#5
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #5
265rwhp ends up being a good bit more than 300 at the fly... about 312, and thats one of the lower i've seen. So if every mustang out there is underrated by at least 10 horses without being broken in, I'll be happy
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Nov 16, 2004
#6
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #6
just some guy said:
thats a big switch from the 300+ everyone said they would put down before they came out...you know...saying they are underrated and all.
Click to expand...

The 300HP that is quoted by Ford is fly-wheel horsepower (or FWHP). The figures quoted in this thread are rear-wheel horsepower (or RWHP). The reason that RWHP is lower than FWHP is that some power is lost in the transmission and differential before it gets to the wheels. The generally accepted percentage of loss for a manual transmission is 15-18%. If you divide the RWHP by 0.85 you get FWHP for the 15% loss. In this case it's 265/0.85 = 311.8. That's a good bit more than the advertised HP. The numbers I've seen for automatics runs from 20-25% loss.
 

Cook89Notch

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
3,201
8
59
Close to Lansing, MI.
Nov 16, 2004
#7
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #7
I would say that those number aren't so bad for a car that has such a small amount of miles on it. COOL!

I can't wait to see what bolt ons and sometuning is going to do for these cars.

It seems like there should be a great deal of potential in the VCT all by it's self.

Waiting for results, Matt.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Nov 16, 2004
#8
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #8
It's still about 30 - 40 rwhp more then the outgoing GT, seems pretty good to me.
 

JaysGreenLX

Founding Member
Oct 8, 2000
2,252
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Nov 16, 2004
#9
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #9
Wow those are some pretty decent numbers. I can't wait to see what they cars are capable of.
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Nov 16, 2004
#10
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #10
Need the new tune numbers!!! Must have them now!!!
 

vrpirata

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
274
0
0
Southern California
Nov 16, 2004
#11
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #11
TomServo92 said:
The 300HP that is quoted by Ford is fly-wheel horsepower (or FWHP). The figures quoted in this thread are rear-wheel horsepower (or RWHP). The reason that RWHP is lower than FWHP is that some power is lost in the transmission and differential before it gets to the wheels. The generally accepted percentage of loss for a manual transmission is 15-18%. If you divide the RWHP by 0.85 you get FWHP for the 15% loss. In this case it's 265/0.85 = 311.8. That's a good bit more than the advertised HP. The numbers I've seen for automatics runs from 20-25% loss.
Click to expand...

Looking at the pictures seems like that Stang is Automatic, that means <b>265/.80 = 331FWHP !!!</b>
 
2

2000BLKGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2001
361
0
0
Toronto
Nov 16, 2004
#12
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #12
vrpirata said:
Looking at the pictures seems like that Stang is Automatic, that means <b>265/.80 = 331FWHP !!!</b>
Click to expand...

Not these guys (Steeda.ca)...that car is a stick
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Nov 16, 2004
#13
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #13
vrpirata said:
Looking at the pictures seems like that Stang is Automatic, that means <b>265/.80 = 331FWHP !!!</b>
Click to expand...
Looks like a M5 to me
 

Mr_dcj2001

Member
Sep 8, 2004
355
0
16
California
Nov 16, 2004
#14
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #14
Not too shabby. That ride is a manual, you can see in the last couple of pics.
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Nov 16, 2004
#15
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #15
AzSnake said:
Looks like a M5 to me
Click to expand...

Yep. If you look at the last pic you can see the boot around the shifter.
 
W

watch

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
38
0
0
Nov 16, 2004
#16
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #16
Why didn't you take out the hydrocarbon trap to get those results ?
 
0

01GT/03ZX9

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
60
0
0
casselberry,FL
Nov 16, 2004
#17
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #17
when you say "removed air silencer" are you referring to the obstruction in the air hose just after the airbox,or something in the fenderwell.removing it gave ya only 1 hp ,but 5 lbs of torque-not bad.
 

meist@steeda.ca

New Member
Dec 18, 2003
41
0
0
Toronto
Nov 16, 2004
#18
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #18
01GT/03ZX9 said:
when you say "removed air silencer" are you referring to the obstruction in the air hose just after the airbox,or something in the fenderwell.removing it gave ya only 1 hp ,but 5 lbs of torque-not bad.
Click to expand...

Between the air box ad fender there is a small rubber silencer, similar to older car's but less restrictive.

The car is a 5psd.
 
S

svtguy

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2002
1,094
0
36
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 16, 2004
#19
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #19
meist@steeda.ca said:
Between the air box ad fender there is a small rubber silencer, similar to older car's but less restrictive.

The car is a 5psd.
Click to expand...

Was it MustangDyno or Dynojet numbers?
 

Lawman85

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2001
126
0
0
Nov 16, 2004
#20
  • Nov 16, 2004
  • #20
Actually, Ford is advertising on a 12% power loss in drivetrain for the manual 5spd. So with that... 266rwhp = 302 hp at the crank.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
Engine Intake Temperature Dyno Difference
  • FastDriver
  • Jul 2, 2015
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 5, 2015
Gearbanger 101
L
2012 GT stock dyno run
  • lokstag1
  • May 30, 2011
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 31, 2011
warmongoose
my 2011GT dyno
  • billfisher
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Nov 26, 2010
94GTLaserRC
Finally got some dyno numbers wanted some input.
  • 69Rcode_Mach1
  • Mar 1, 2010
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 5, 2010
brianj5600
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?