• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

1/8th to 1/4

  • Thread starter Thread starter FoxRod87
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2006

FoxRod87

Active Member
Feb 1, 2006
243
1
27
Carolina
Dec 18, 2006
#1
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #1
My buddy has an 03 mach I with just gears and exhaust and he run it in an 1/8th and run a 7.79 at 88 what would this be in a 1/4 mile.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 18, 2006
#2
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #2
The NHRA conversion is to mulitply the ET b 1.55. There really isn't a general rule of thumb to convert the MPH. 88 MPH in the 1/8th sure is a strong number for a 03 Mach 1 with just gears and exhaust.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Dec 18, 2006
#3
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #3
I dont think that Mach is running 7.79 in the 1/8th w/ just gears and exhaust. Thats somewhere around a 12 flat in the 1/4 mile.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Dec 18, 2006
#4
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #4
maybe 8.79, definitely not 7.79.

theres not magic forumula, no special calculator that will give you a real accurate 1/8 to 1/4 conversion. They may give you a rough idea, but there are way to many variables to consider.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Dec 18, 2006
#5
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #5
I will guess 12.20 at 108 MPH. That said what was his 60 foot time? What kind of rear tires was he running? What gear ratio did he have in the rear?
 

FoxRod87

Active Member
Feb 1, 2006
243
1
27
Carolina
Dec 19, 2006
#6
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #6
weld prostars with 26x11.5 et streets, and 4.30s . 60ft was 1.64 spinning. and yes it was 7.79 at 88.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Dec 19, 2006
#7
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #7
That is a pretty good 60 foot time. Based on that with the other times his 1/4 time maybe closer to 12.3-12.35.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 19, 2006
#8
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #8
Very impressive 60 footer and 1/8 mile numbers. The 4.30's and the ET streets earned him the good little end numbers.
 
R

rogers

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2002
339
0
0
Dec 19, 2006
#9
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #9
Your buddy need to get the 60's on down. Get the ET Street off and put a set of 26x10 ET Drags. What's done to the suspension? If you can get your buddy on here I would like to know his launch and shift RPM. Also how much air pressure was he running in the ET Streets.
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Dec 19, 2006
#10
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #10
Wow I want a Mach 1 :<
 

crzyhrse99

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
259
3
28
Kansas
Dec 19, 2006
#11
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #11
http://www.eldemoniorojo.com/calculator.htm

Like someone else said, too many variables .....but heres an estimated chart.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 19, 2006
#12
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #12
rogers said:
Your buddy need to get the 60's on down. Get the ET Street off and put a set of 26x10 ET Drags. What's done to the suspension? If you can get your buddy on here I would like to know his launch and shift RPM. Also how much air pressure was he running in the ET Streets.
Click to expand...

Yeah....cause a 1.64 60ft time just sucks.
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
&quot;but what's with the but shots?&quot;
Dec 19, 2006
#13
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #13
I've seen multipliers of 1.56, 1.57 and 1.58.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Dec 19, 2006
#14
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #14
Yeah, I have seen quite a few different variances of the multipliers throughout different NHRA and IHRA literature as well. But they are just to roughly estimate what your 1/4 ET would be, and if we take them to mean just that they are a pretty good tool.

Only thing is they don't account for alot of the variables like has already been noted. It is not uncommon for a relatively stock car to rip some awesome 60 ft, 330 ft, and 1/8 mile numbers, especially with alot of gear and slicks. The big end of the 1/4 is where the HP really factors in. So if this same guy were to run an actual 1/4 mile, he might actually be more in the upper 12's.

Nevertheless, he has a car that is digging pretty hard for a relatively unmodded chassis/suspension.
 
R

rogers

Founding Member
Feb 25, 2002
339
0
0
Dec 19, 2006
#15
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #15
Gearbanger. A 1.64 does suck when you go 1.25-1.28 on average.

If the car has any suspesion mod it should go 1.55-1.58. But alot depend on getting the car to hook. The track prep, tires, suspension adjustment, etc, etc. He would see alot of improvement by getting a real set of slicks:nice. I have never had any luck with the ET Street.
 

FoxRod87

Active Member
Feb 1, 2006
243
1
27
Carolina
Dec 20, 2006
#16
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #16
The et streets are what he drives on the street with and yes slicks would do better, and also the track sucked that day. He never got a good burnout the rearend wanted to keep going to the left. It just barely started to smoke the tires.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2003 Mach 1 Wiring
  • JohnnyUtah
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
82
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
squeak93
Took the TTSaleen out today for some drive time.
  • TTSaleen
  • Aug 22, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
125
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 22, 2025
TTSaleen
Picked up a new project - 1993 Coupe
  • TTSaleen
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2026
Mindseye007
B
Tensioner arm bolt
  • brandon4v
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
249
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 2, 2026
squeak93
J
Front neoprene front bumper painted color of my 71 Mach1 some hair line cracks
  • JJHstang
  • May 25, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
56
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?