100 Internet points to the closest guess!

D

DARK-5.0

Founding Member

Feb 20, 2002

724

1

19

Leawood, KS

Dec 11, 2005

#21

• Dec 11, 2005

• #21

You pegged your 90mm Lightning Maf. meter? I find that hard to believe. A lot of turbo guys use that meter and have great success with more power than what you're making. You are speaking of the maf meter correct?

Jeremy

 

KBCobra95

New Member

Aug 28, 2005

356

0

0

North Carolina

Dec 11, 2005

#22

• Dec 11, 2005

• #22

Dyno man said that the lightning maf meters were only good for 460-480 hp. Just going by what i was told.

 

D

Daggar

New Member

Jul 19, 2004

3,902

5

0

Dec 11, 2005

#23

• Dec 11, 2005

• #23

KBCobra95 said:

Dyno man said that the lightning maf meters were only good for 460-480 hp. Just going by what i was told.

Click to expand...

That's about right. Many folks end up upgrading to the SCT Big Mouth without having to make changes to the meter transfer function. They're a direct replacement for the 30/04 Cobras and Lightnings.

 

Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member

Dec 23, 2002

2,959

2

0

Massachusetts

Dec 11, 2005

#24

• Dec 11, 2005

• #24

Wheres killercanary to comment on this thread? I believe he has a cousin with an AFR/FTI/KB combo that puts down 390rwhp (i think). Im wondering what the combo differences are since theres such a power difference.

 

WhiteStallionGT

Member

Aug 19, 2004

465

0

17

Northern VA / VT

Dec 11, 2005

#25

• Dec 11, 2005

• #25

omg... 7lbs of boost and those numbers... INSANE!!!!

 

F

fiveohh94gt

New Member

Dec 26, 2003

277

0

0

Dec 11, 2005

#26

• Dec 11, 2005

• #26

almost my exact combo, minus the blower.......now i'm going to be putting a KB on my christmas list

 

Black95GTS

Active Member

Jan 8, 2004

1,644

3

38

Marlborough, MA

Dec 12, 2005

#27

• Dec 12, 2005

• #27

Very impressive. Those 1.7s are definately coming in handy adding as much duration as they do.

adam

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Dec 12, 2005

#28

• Dec 12, 2005

• #28

I also find it interesting you pegged that maf.

Are these SAE values btw?

Also curious as why you decided to put your dyno results in the Talk Forum?

Grady

 

WhiteStallionGT

Member

Aug 19, 2004

465

0

17

Northern VA / VT

Dec 12, 2005

#29

• Dec 12, 2005

• #29

I don't know y i posted.

 

Stangfreak95

add a 4

Founding Member

Nov 4, 2002

3,571

0

0

In your sister. If none, your mom

Dec 12, 2005

#30

• Dec 12, 2005

• #30

Great numbers. I love the KB blowers

 

KBCobra95

New Member

Aug 28, 2005

356

0

0

North Carolina

Dec 12, 2005

#31

• Dec 12, 2005

• #31

final5-0 said:

I also find it interesting you pegged that maf.

Are these SAE values btw?

Also curious as why you decided to put your dyno results in the Talk Forum?

Grady

Click to expand...

Didnt know where else to post it. Not really a tech question. 94/95 - 5.0 is the only parts I look in.

 

BlackVert

15 Year Member

Oct 3, 2003

5,589

9

98

Bethesda, MD

Dec 19, 2005

#32

• Dec 19, 2005

• #32

i just saw this ... ... gotta love that torque curve ...

i'm not expecting numbers nearly so high from mine, it is a 1.8L, not a 2.2 ... i'm hoping to turn the key over the xmas break ...

are you doing anything to bring the boosted air temps down (water or methanol injection, ...)?