• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

12 second factory fox body

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1killercoupe
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
T

tobalx

Member
Sep 14, 2011
53
0
6
Feb 7, 2012
#21
  • Feb 7, 2012
  • #21
the world record for a stock mustang with tunning is low 11's, i don't know what stock class entails but i think it is all original with a tune and porting. i think his name is ed hohemburg. he has a tuning shop in canada . i belive it is wolfe performance.http://www.wolfperformance.com/about.html
 
T

tobalx

Member
Sep 14, 2011
53
0
6
Feb 7, 2012
#22
  • Feb 7, 2012
  • #22
sorry it was 12.30 with only a 3 angle valve job
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Feb 7, 2012
#23
  • Feb 7, 2012
  • #23
We all know Canada numbers are wrong.... they use the metric system ... LOL
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Feb 15, 2012
#24
  • Feb 15, 2012
  • #24
HELL YES! LOADS OF STOCKERS HAVE SEEN 12'S MASS AIR AND SD CARS
 

cw50must

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2000
907
1
16
Mesa, AZ
Feb 18, 2012
#25
  • Feb 18, 2012
  • #25
5.0Droptop said:
I searched old threads I couldn't find his track thread. But here's his car info

Mike H.
'92 deep jewel green coupe, MAM, clutch, full exhaust, gears, u/d's, air bag - otherwise, factory original.
232rwhp/292rwtq - 12.960 @ 104.016, 1.737 60', 2600 d/a...
Click to expand...

I might actually have an old video of this, let me look.
 

cw50must

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2000
907
1
16
Mesa, AZ
Feb 18, 2012
#26
  • Feb 18, 2012
  • #26
Ok I found it.

 

cw50must

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2000
907
1
16
Mesa, AZ
Feb 18, 2012
#27
  • Feb 18, 2012
  • #27
These old videos are fun.

Here are some more of his car


And another of him and I.

 
D

DavidEwers

Member
Sep 23, 2011
168
1
18
Somewhere in Paradise
Feb 19, 2012
#28
  • Feb 19, 2012
  • #28
This is NHRA stocker, believe me there is nothing stock about this car, the cam, heads, converter, transmission, gears and so forth have been changed.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Mar 1, 2012
#29
  • Mar 1, 2012
  • #29
thanks CW.
My car had bone stock suspension(factory original shocks etc... right down to bushings) and zero weight removal. Would have been fun to run that combo at sea level... or with a decent suspension.

Ed's car was indeed NHRA stock, the heads and intakes were stock (they flowed a ton of stock castings in selecting his final set), the cam was a class legal stick with a max. of 0.500 lift and he shifted a T5 right handy to 5300rpm. The suspension was well set up and Ed is quite a shoe.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 1, 2012
#30
  • Mar 1, 2012
  • #30
If you're telling me you could take one of these cars off the showroom floor, put slicks on it and run 12.99, i'd call you a liar. No way, no how, not with the hand of God pushing it down the track. I've heard of guys who say they have stock engines, but they've been taken apart, balanced, have a cam that was hand picked out of a slew of stock cams that were all measured to find the ones with the most generous "stock" specs that are then degreed/tuned on a dyno, heads and intakes that are hand picked and flowed out, tons of weight reduction...the list goes on and on and on. In the end you can have a car that's technically stock as far as the parts list goes, but has been gone through with a fine tooth comb and had every old hotrod trick done to it.

When i think stock, i'm talking about factory Ford gaskets throughout the entire engine that have never been broken, air silencer, etc etc. That kind of "stock" doesn't run 12s unless you're talking about an LS1.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Mar 1, 2012
#31
  • Mar 1, 2012
  • #31
my car had the motor that is was ship'd with. Underdrive pullies and a 76mm MAM... full exhaust, ceramic clutch, DOT's and skinnies with a 4.10 gear. No suspension work, and no weigh loss. Not even the sway bar was missing.
It went 12.96 in 2600 da...
As far as LS1's go, it ate them at the track, but could not hold a candle to 'em from a roll on the street.

Before I moved to the desert I lived at sea level, and with nothing but and offroad H pipe, 3.73's and 235/65-15 drag radials it went 13.2's... well, Hurst shifter.

Yes, you find me a low milage notch, get it to sea level put 4.10's, slicks and a good shifter in it, and I'll go 12's for you.

It now wears quality E7's, TMoss HO intakes and a little cam and makes 292hps and 325tq's on 7 cylinders .

You know, this whole deal was well documented on the interwebs back in the day.
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,050
653
164
SE Michigan
Mar 2, 2012
#32
  • Mar 2, 2012
  • #32
This is funny...what is your definition of stock?

my "stock" 92 went 11.20's LOL

Scott
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Mar 2, 2012
#33
  • Mar 2, 2012
  • #33
I don't buy any stock Fox going 12's. People try to define "stock" but there is only one definition. As it came from the manufacturing plant, with everything in place. They were LUCKY to break into the 13's, 12's aren't even a consideration, unless it is being pushed off a 1/4 mile cliff.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 2, 2012
#34
  • Mar 2, 2012
  • #34
Just because it seems some people have a strange definition of what stock means, lets lay it out....There's a big difference between NHRA stock and legitimate off the dealership lot stock.

Legitimate stock doesn’t mean a stock long block with a full host of intake and exhaust bolt ons, gears, suspension mods, tires, etc.

We’re talking stock, off the showroom floor, right down to the plastic air horn in the intake track here. Sure…play with the timing, pull the air filter and even tinker with the fuel and tire pressure.…. as long as it doesn’t involve swapping out a slew of the stock parts in favour of aftermarket stuff, you’re fine, but anything beyond that and the car isn’t stock anymore! In that respect, I have yet to personally lay eyes on a legitimate 12-second Fox that meets that requirement.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 2, 2012
#35
  • Mar 2, 2012
  • #35
So basically, if i take a coupe and gut it to a bare metal shell with a milk crate for a seat, put 4.10s in it, slicks and skinnies, drop all the accessories, tubular K member and A arms, no sway bars, full suspension in the back, lexan windows, fiberglass hood and doors, no bumpers...and i take it out and run 11.xx at the track, i can say "HEY I RAN 11's STOCK!!".


Sorry but that's retarded.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Mar 3, 2012
#36
  • Mar 3, 2012
  • #36
Unless the car is exactly the same as it was when it came out of the Ford factory, it ain't stock anymore, therefore a stock 12-second Fox body is a myth. It didn't come out of the factory as a 12-second car and it takes a whole slew of mods to make it a 12-second car. I don't consider a car that hits the 1/4 mile in 12.99 secs to be a 12-second car either; it's as near as dammit a 13-sec car.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Project Guide: The 1979-1993 "Fox Body" Ford Mustang and 1979-1986 Mercury Capri
  • Mindseye007
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
8
Progress Thread New member w/87 Foxbody & SN95 Donor
  • 87foxbodyguy
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
333
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2025
AeroCoupe
A
90 Fox 4Lug rear convert to 5 Lug
  • adimice
  • Jun 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
127
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
limp
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?