• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

13.20 @ 104 stock!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lopey4.6
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 12, 2004
#1
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #1
13.20 @ 104 stock!! by Peter Espeut of Espeut Performance

Well folks I'm back in Cleveland after being at capitol raceway this afternoon and the day was a complete success. I was there helping my brother in law prepare the car this weekend and it ran a 13.20 at 104mph with a 2.0 60ft. Were talking bone stock down to the paper air filter, on the stock 235-55-17 tires. This individual is a way above average driver and has been a past trophey stock, and Modular champion. We did do a little weight reduction to the vehicle but nothing drastic. Our goal was to get a baseline on the car before modifications. The owner still has to make up his mind on which class he's gonna run next year, but you can bet the car is going to be built to spec for whatever class he decides.

Just click on my sig to see a couple pics of the car.
 
2

2001whiteGT

New Member
Mar 29, 2002
7
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#2
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #2
lopey4.6 said:
Well folks I'm back in Cleveland after being at capitol raceway this afternoon and the day was a complete success. I was there helping my brother in law prepare the car this weekend and it ran a 13.20 at 104mph with a 2.0 60ft. Were talking bone stock down to the paper air filter, on the stock 235-55-17 tires. This individual is a way above average driver and has been a past trophey stock, and Modular champion. We did do a little weight reduction to the vehicle but nothing drastic. Our goal was to get a baseline on the car before modifications. The owner still has to make up his mind on which class he's gonna run next year, but you can bet the car is going to be built to spec for whatever class he decides.

Just click on my sig to see a couple pics of the car.
Click to expand...


sweet these cars are just amazing!
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Dec 12, 2004
#3
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #3
We've had a lot of bogus ET claims here so it would be great if you could provide some type of proof like a timeslip or video (or both if possible). Otherwise you're going to catch hell from the forum.
 

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 12, 2004
#4
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #4
I understand that. The time slips are 8 hours away from me and my bro. in law is not the most comp. savy. It was witnessed by many though. I'll see what I can do.

And by the way I've been a well respected member on here and many other boards for almost 5 years. I have no reason to BS.
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Dec 12, 2004
#5
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #5
lopey4.6 said:
I understand that. The time slips are 8 hours away from me and my bro. in law is not the most comp. savy. It was witnessed by many though. I'll see what I can do.

And by the way I've been a well respected member on here and many other boards for almost 5 years. I have no reason to BS.
Click to expand...

Understood but I thought I would give you a warning before the skeptics pounce.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 12, 2004
#6
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #6
If thats true, then those are some awesome times, but I hope you have timeslips because its only a matter of time before people start calling bs, only because one person who claimed a 13.2 turned out to be a liar.
 

Scot_94GT

Founding Member
Jun 20, 2002
262
0
0
Spring Lake Park, MN
Dec 12, 2004
#7
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #7
How much and what kind of weight reduction?

13.2 is on the lunatic fringe of what is known to be a believable et for the 05.
So far we've had an aleged 13.35, and a false 13.2....hope this one is legit, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Dec 12, 2004
#8
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #8
Scot_94GT said:
How much and what kind of weight reduction?

13.2 is on the lunatic fringe of what is known to be a believable et for the 05.
So far we've had an aleged 13.35, and a false 13.2....hope this one is legit, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Click to expand...

I would say the 13.35 is a little more than alleged since he's posted a timeslip and other forum members have stated they witnessed the run.
 

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 12, 2004
#9
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #9
Well we removed the A/C, back seat, spare tire and jack. And the guy driving is more or less a professional driver. If someone wants to call bs no problem.
 

onesticker

New Member
Feb 19, 2003
222
0
0
Jacksonville,FL
Dec 12, 2004
#10
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #10
Just get a time slip on here as soon as possible. Otherwise it is
 
J

jasonlee0704

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
219
0
0
Kansas City, MO
Dec 12, 2004
#11
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #11
So about 200 lbs. of weight reduction? That's pretty believable for the ET.
 

bryanzstang

New Member
Oct 24, 2004
36
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#12
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #12
if this guy is so good , why only a 2.00 sixty, average drivers should be able to do that.
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Dec 13, 2004
#13
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #13
bryanzstang said:
if this guy is so good , why only a 2.00 sixty, average drivers should be able to do that.
Click to expand...
true dat!! even the mag say's no better then mid to high 14's but then again we'll see in the proof. peace


john
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 13, 2004
#14
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #14
Sweet those are amazing cars!
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 13, 2004
#15
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #15
I had work done by Pete this past summer. I asked him if he was going to get an 05 GT, he said he was going to hold out for the Cobra. Guess that didn't happen?

His 03 Cobra is INSANE!!!!!

EDIT: oooh, he's doing it for a customer. Pete is a great guy, wish I lived closer. I'd go to his shop more often to see the cool ****.
 
B

boxerperson

New Member
Oct 24, 2004
22
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#16
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #16
I believe it. With the jack and spair gone from the back of the car, I'd imagine the 60ft times might go up a tenth of a second or two.

And mags aren't saying this is a mid/high 14 second car. They're saying mid/high 13 second.
 
G

gilmoujr

New Member
Sep 24, 2004
126
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#17
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #17
I have not been on the board for a couple of days but the car is NOT stock with weight reduction. Do not get me wrong. This is a helluva run but I cannot accept it as a STOCK timeslip/ In my opinion, even running lower than the MFG recommended tire pressure removes it from being in the STOCK category. Just my opinion and not intended to flame. Some have other opinions about what makes a car stock.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Dec 13, 2004
#18
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #18
lopey4.6 said:
Well we removed the A/C, back seat, spare tire and jack. And the guy driving is more or less a professional driver. If someone wants to call bs no problem.
Click to expand...


a/c is NOT minor

and there are peopel cutting 1.8s 1.9s on stock tires... the professional driver needs some work on his launch or the track needs some more bite.

his shifting is good of course
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Dec 13, 2004
#19
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #19
gilmoujr said:
I have not been on the board for a couple of days but the car is NOT stock with weight reduction. Do not get me wrong. This is a helluva run but I cannot accept it as a STOCK timeslip/ In my opinion, even running lower than the MFG recommended tire pressure removes it from being in the STOCK category. Just my opinion and not intended to flame. Some have other opinions about what makes a car stock.
Click to expand...
stock air pressure?
now that is hilarious

i would give stock to free things being removed. lets say anything that takes 5-10 minutes to take off.

sway bar air silencer jack and spare. seat being removed is would definitely have to be mentioned, as would A/C! or muffler removal.... anyone tried that yet?
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 13, 2004
#20
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #20
gilmoujr said:
I have not been on the board for a couple of days but the car is NOT stock with weight reduction. Do not get me wrong. This is a helluva run but I cannot accept it as a STOCK timeslip/ In my opinion, even running lower than the MFG recommended tire pressure removes it from being in the STOCK category. Just my opinion and not intended to flame. Some have other opinions about what makes a car stock.
Click to expand...
tire pressure dude?
what about a heavier set person versus a skinny person? is that allowed?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?