13.20 @ 104 stock!!
- Thread starter lopey4.6
- Start date
- Status
JonJon
Founding Member
didn't you just learn to drive your car guy...bryanzstang said:
they need more time with the new car
bryanzstang said:
That's the same thing I was thinking. You got two runs under 1.9 with your low 13.3s. The slip would help when you can post it!
What's the rule of thumb with weight reduction and ETs? Isn't it a 10th for every 100 pounds taken out???
Also, Bryan, you still on for Valdosta on 12/19? I'm almost positive I will make it so I can get some runs in before the holidays.
bryanzstang
New Member
- Oct 24, 2004
- 36
- 0
- 0
Funny that when you said about the weight reduction that it was nothing major. Then you post it was the AC, Back Seat, etc. Around here in Florida.. LOL.. If you remove the AC. It's MAJOR!. 
You'd have to be a definite hardcore racer to remove the AC.. It gets pretty WARM in the summer time here!
You'd have to be a definite hardcore racer to remove the AC.. It gets pretty WARM in the summer time here!
AzSnake
Founding Member
some guys seem to forget thatt he track has as much to do with the 60's as the driver does.95snoozer said:a/c is NOT minor
and there are peopel cutting 1.8s 1.9s on stock tires... the professional driver needs some work on his launch or the track needs some more bite.
his shifting is good of course
Scot_94GT
Founding Member
Well...if 200 lbs is worth .2 seconds, then that brings the time to around 13.4 for absolute stock...which is still very impresive.
AzSnake
Founding Member
Thtas what JDM got with their 05 when they ran it bone stock. So thats roughly 2 that have gone 13.4Scot_94GT said:Well...if 200 lbs is worth .2 seconds, then that brings the time to around 13.4 for absolute stock...which is still very impresive.
hotmustang331
Active Member
Um 13.20 is a little low for a 2.0 60', your time is really off the line.That other guy who ran a 13.35 pulled like a 1.87 60', I really doubt you could run an ET like that with that 60'.Trap is possable, especially with weight reduction...well just seen your list of weight reduction mods, and A. that is NOT a stock base line B. now I can see the trap really easy, but 13.2 is kinda hard to believe STILL, however it is possable. A stock baseline is WITH FULL weight, just because you leave the engine stock does NOT mean that that is what it runs stock. Now lowering tire pressure is ok IMO, and tire/jack removal should be mentioned...basically if you take ANYTHING off or add anything that improves performance in any way, it should be mentioned.I wanted to run mine STOCK but i added a K&N filter and we made a custom ram air before I had a chance to run it. EVERYTHING else was how it came from the factory, including tire pressure LOL.That probably explaines the 2.24 60', but that was my first time to the track with that car.(second ever)
Sorry for offending anyone or misleading anyone. I'll post the time slip tomorrow or the following day.
Firts off I made a misteak, the 60ft was like 1.94. Or right around there, I just couldn't remember exactly.
Second, this et was the second time ever he ran the car down the 1/4 mile. And he only just got the car on monday, and has never driven an 05 before that.
Third: If you know capitol raceway it is one Shi$#y track.
Fourth: I apologize for saying Bone stock. The idea was to see what kind of numbers we can get without adding any aftermarket parts. The parts that were removed can be put back in a couple hours. Thats not too hardcore.
So weather anyone wants to believe it or not fine. But I will say this: The 05 Mustang with a great driver, a little weight removed, and sticky tires will be high 12's easily.
And were going to be seeing a lot of this car when the season hits.
Firts off I made a misteak, the 60ft was like 1.94. Or right around there, I just couldn't remember exactly.
Second, this et was the second time ever he ran the car down the 1/4 mile. And he only just got the car on monday, and has never driven an 05 before that.
Third: If you know capitol raceway it is one Shi$#y track.
Fourth: I apologize for saying Bone stock. The idea was to see what kind of numbers we can get without adding any aftermarket parts. The parts that were removed can be put back in a couple hours. Thats not too hardcore.
So weather anyone wants to believe it or not fine. But I will say this: The 05 Mustang with a great driver, a little weight removed, and sticky tires will be high 12's easily.
And were going to be seeing a lot of this car when the season hits.
JonJon
Founding Member
Is it Pete's car or a customer's car? Did he race his Cobra too?lopey4.6 said:
I had talked to Pete about cams, I assume you're the one with the cams
95snoozer said:1. you cant read
2. you suck at driving
3 they do match just fine
4. you should delete your post save face and leave the forum now with your 13.6 at 104
1) yes I can! He edited the post cause he's lying
2) no they don't.Not with the 2.2 60 ft he posted originaly.
3) I guess you can't read. The 13.6, and 104 didn't happen at the same time.
[
Thats a Ford mechanic your talking about there pal. Thats his first post because he has better things to do like build fast 5.0's instead of arguing over the internet.
If your too ignorant to recognize groundbreaking performance from the new GT then you loose.
Thats a Ford mechanic your talking about there pal. Thats his first post because he has better things to do like build fast 5.0's instead of arguing over the internet.
I edited it bacause I was in a hurry and mispelled things.
I never poasted a 2.2.
If your too ignorant to recognize groundbreaking performance from the new GT then you loose.
- Status
