• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

13.20 @ 104 stock!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lopey4.6
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 13, 2004
#41
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #41
AzSnake said:
Thtas what JDM got with their 05 when they ran it bone stock. So thats roughly 2 that have gone 13.4
Click to expand...
Paul and JDM went 13.4, magazines went 13.5-6, theres a couple members who went 13.3-4 here and on other forums theres a few who also ran a 13.4. I'm counting more than just two.
 

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 13, 2004
#42
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #42
All right whats goin on here? Yeah so anyway I posted this because 13.2 is very impressive for just some prep work.

JonJon, yes thats Pete's car.
 
D

Deleted member 64287

Dec 13, 2004
#43
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #43
jadesville said:
Paul and JDM went 13.4, magazines went 13.5-6, theres a couple members who went 13.3-4 here and on other forums theres a few who also ran a 13.4. I'm counting more than just two.
Click to expand...

The mags probably got some 13.4's as well. They do averages, correct?
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 13, 2004
#44
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #44
Gloveperson said:
The mags probably got some 13.4's as well. They do averages, correct?
Click to expand...
I dont recall any magazine running a 13.4; they dont have the best drivers, didnt C&D run a 13.6?

edit: my mistake I read it wrong, I've read articles where they took the best of runs and the average.
 

Bobbys97R

New Member
Sep 6, 2004
224
0
0
Lakewood
Dec 13, 2004
#45
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #45
hummmmmmmmmmmmm.......
 
Z

ZZtop

New Member
Dec 14, 2004
3
0
0
Dec 14, 2004
#46
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #46
jadesville said:
Paul and JDM went 13.4, magazines went 13.5-6, theres a couple members who went 13.3-4 here and on other forums theres a few who also ran a 13.4. I'm counting more than just two.
Click to expand...


Lets not get ahead of ourselves here.

Paul went 13.9 and yes JDM went 13.4. That's 13.4 at Englishtown Raceway(one of the fastest there is) in very cold air. Motortrend went 13.5 at like 103.6mph, which seams very fishy. We have not seen that trap speed coupled with a time close to that from an actual owner. Shoot, I cant recall if I have even seen that trap speed with a slow run. The 13.6 was in an auto and a pre-production car at that. Remember that many magazines run their times at abandoned airports and such, not always at legit tracks.

There have been claims from some of 13.3-13.4 runs. The only one I have seen backed up is Bryan with the white GT. Please post links to validated 13.3-13.4 runs as I could have easily missed them. We have heard lots of bogus claims, where the starter of the thread mysteriously disappeared when asked to post a timeslip.

Don't get me wront, the times we have seen, even the 13.6's are absolutely amazing. I for one am very impressed. For a 3500lb car with 270rwhp to run those times on street tires is very impressive. Not to mention the 13.35 Bryan ran. I just hope all the kids reading these posts dont think that when they get one for a graduation present this June they are going to go to the track and run these times. This is THE time of year (well Jan and Feb are good too) to run fast times and the drivers ticking of the 13.3-13.4's are very experienced at the track: JDM and Bryan.
 
A

auto02

Member
Nov 25, 2002
92
0
6
surrency,georgia
Dec 14, 2004
#47
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #47
ZZtop said:
Lets not get ahead of ourselves here.

Paul went 13.9 and yes JDM went 13.4. That's 13.4 at Englishtown Raceway(one of the fastest there is) in very cold air. Motortrend went 13.5 at like 103.6mph, which seams very fishy. We have not seen that trap speed coupled with a time close to that from an actual owner. Shoot, I cant recall if I have even seen that trap speed with a slow run. The 13.6 was in an auto and a pre-production car at that. Remember that many magazines run their times at abandoned airports and such, not always at legit tracks.

There have been claims from some of 13.3-13.4 runs. The only one I have seen backed up is Bryan with the white GT. Please post links to validated 13.3-13.4 runs as I could have easily missed them. We have heard lots of bogus claims, where the starter of the thread mysteriously disappeared when asked to post a timeslip.

Don't get me wront, the times we have seen, even the 13.6's are absolutely amazing. I for one am very impressed. For a 3500lb car with 270rwhp to run those times on street tires is very impressive. Not to mention the 13.35 Bryan ran. I just hope all the kids reading these posts dont think that when they get one for a graduation present this June they are going to go to the track and run these times. This is THE time of year (well Jan and Feb are good too) to run fast times and the drivers ticking of the 13.3-13.4's are very experienced at the track: JDM and Bryan.
Click to expand...
well,i guess that sums it up!!! (and i also shall be at sgmp on the 19th)
 

bryanzstang

New Member
Oct 24, 2004
36
0
0
Dec 14, 2004
#48
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #48
see ya there, btw is gtp2gto going to be there? i'm trying to get one of my employees to bring his moms stock 04 gto so i can make some passes in it too, i'm curious as to what it will run.
 

NotoriousGT350

Founding Member
Apr 3, 2001
891
0
17
Lubbock, TX
Dec 14, 2004
#49
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #49
Can't wait for the results! Good luck
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 14, 2004
#50
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #50
ZZtop said:
Lets not get ahead of ourselves here.
Paul went 13.9 and yes JDM went 13.4. That's 13.4 at Englishtown Raceway(one of the fastest there is) in very cold air. Motortrend went 13.5 at like 103.6mph, which seams very fishy. We have not seen that trap speed coupled with a time close to that from an actual owner. Shoot, I cant recall if I have even seen that trap speed with a slow run. The 13.6 was in an auto and a pre-production car at that. Remember that many magazines run their times at abandoned airports and such, not always at legit tracks.
Click to expand...

Paul ran an UNCORRECTED 13.90 @ 101.35mph with a 2.13 60' in Milan; 80F with 60% humidity. Motortrend ran a 13.6 @ 99.9mph on an Automatic, and that was on a track, not an airport.

ZZtop said:
There have been claims from some of 13.3-13.4 runs. The only one I have seen backed up is Bryan with the white GT. Please post links to validated 13.3-13.4 runs as I could have easily missed them. We have heard lots of bogus claims, where the starter of the thread mysteriously disappeared when asked to post a timeslip.

Don't get me wront, the times we have seen, even the 13.6's are absolutely amazing. I for one am very impressed. For a 3500lb car with 270rwhp to run those times on street tires is very impressive. Not to mention the 13.35 Bryan ran. I just hope all the kids reading these posts dont think that when they get one for a graduation present this June they are going to go to the track and run these times. This is THE time of year (well Jan and Feb are good too) to run fast times and the drivers ticking of the 13.3-13.4's are very experienced at the track: JDM and Bryan.
Click to expand...

I searched quicky on other forums and I didnt find the threads which I saw the rest of the times, and I've only seen one bogus claim, and that was from SD Wheeler. Theres plenty of 13.6 timeslips, but I know there are atleast two more besides bryans slip running a 13.4 and a 13.5. 13.6 is an amazing time, and thats coming from amateur drivers; look how long it took the GTO to get down to a 13.2, almost a year.
 

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 14, 2004
#51
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #51
This run was made at about 300 ft above sea level, a 15 mph head wind and about 40 deg.
 

jacob9

Banned
Jan 20, 2003
86
0
0
los angeles, ca
Dec 14, 2004
#52
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #52
lopey4.6 said:
This run was made at about 300 ft above sea level, a 15 mph head wind and about 40 deg.
Click to expand...

your story gets more outrageous with every post. your "friend" ran the best time anyone has ever seen WITH a headwind?!!

what causes you to get on here and lie so much??!!

 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 15, 2004
#53
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #53
You're going to post a timeslip right?
 

BlackArtemis

Dated 4 Amandas. Nothing special. Got the job done
Founding Member
Sep 23, 2002
0
3
49
West Chester, PA
Dec 15, 2004
#54
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #54
I ran a 13.1 @ 106 with a 1.7 60ft
But some computer illeterate garden gnomes have my timeslip. They are trying to scan it but only end up downloading furry ****.

I don't care if anyone doesn't believe me, it's the truth!
 

lopey4.6

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 4, 2004
309
0
16
Westlake,OH
Dec 15, 2004
#55
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #55
what causes you to get on here and lie so much??!!
Click to expand...

Relax buddy, I have no reason to lie. I will be posting time slips and the car's dyno numbers. Hopefully this evening. I have better things to do than post garbage in this forum.

And BTW get your post count up a little more before making comments like that.
 

YellowMach69

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
371
0
16
buffalo new york
Dec 15, 2004
#56
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #56
lopey4.6 i believe you.Dont waste your typing argueing with people. 99% of the time when sombody is the type to be BS itting they woundt have a post number like yours. When you get the slips just post thgis next to the picture
 
N

NVigR8

New Member
Nov 21, 2004
11
0
0
Urbana, MD
Dec 15, 2004
#57
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #57
Well, to add some fuel to the fire - if you REALLY want to run a 13.2 BONE stock then you could always buy an '04 GTO. Actually I ran a 13.1@106 at Cecil county in mine BONE STOCK. And oh yeah, I didn't remove seat, or jack, or spare, or AC, etc.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 15, 2004
#58
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #58
NVigR8 said:
Well, to add some fuel to the fire - if you REALLY want to run a 13.2 BONE stock then you could always buy an '04 GTO. Actually I ran a 13.1@106 at Cecil county in mine BONE STOCK. And oh yeah, I didn't remove seat, or jack, or spare, or AC, etc.
Click to expand...
or a mach1
which is why i don't doubt 05's can go low 13's
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Dec 15, 2004
#59
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #59
NVigR8 said:
Well, to add some fuel to the fire - if you REALLY want to run a 13.2 BONE stock then you could always buy an '04 GTO. Actually I ran a 13.1@106 at Cecil county in mine BONE STOCK. And oh yeah, I didn't remove seat, or jack, or spare, or AC, etc.
Click to expand...
Sure you could spend nearly 10K more for a few tenths in the 1/4, weigh more, run slower in the corners, etc,etc,etc…
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Dec 15, 2004
#60
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #60
JonJon said:
or a mach1
which is why i don't doubt 05's can go low 13's
Click to expand...

Exactly. Don’t forget Mach 1’s have run high 12’s bone stock and since we have seen the GT is under rated and running better RWHP numbers than the Mach’s, has a MUCH stiffer chassis and a Much better suspension, and weighs less than 100 lbs more than the Machs. The GT is capable of low 13’s, hell we might have seen some high 12’s if Ford wouldn’t have messed with the TB closing. It cracks me up because the Ford and Mustang haters out there will use that all day long as an advantage in their argument. To see the real abilities of this motor and of this chassis without touching it’s internals, exhaust and even without even touching the fat A/F mixture you gotta get that turned off and allow the driver to control the TB. I’m willing to bet the car could run high 12’s in the ¼ on a good track in good air with a competent driver with just that aspect turned off.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?