GTP2GTO said:so a 269 max whp and a 252 max whp
and looks like 280 tq? Is that correct? oh yeah, where are the timeslips?
powershots said:the second run is the one in blue the darker that was the second run . first run was a warm up.
second run 269rwhp/283rwtq. it is what it is. car definitely needs to breathe. exhaust is restrictive.
as far as tiime slips. that's not me. just posting what was dyno'd. PEACE
GTP2GTO said:So the output is equal to that of an LT1? Correct? Combined output that is. Since LT1's Dyno about 250whp and 295-300Tq.
Not too shabby for a smaller motor I guess. Its about what I would expect from it.
GTP2GTO said:So the output is equal to that of an LT1? Correct? Combined output that is. Since LT1's Dyno about 250whp and 295-300Tq.
Not too shabby for a smaller motor I guess. Its about what I would expect from it.
NVigR8 said:Well, to add some fuel to the fire - if you REALLY want to run a 13.2 BONE stock then you could always buy an '04 GTO. Actually I ran a 13.1@106 at Cecil county in mine BONE STOCK. And oh yeah, I didn't remove seat, or jack, or spare, or AC, etc.
powershots said:I will be honest and tell you I know nothing of the LT1. I will then take your word for it. so yes they are close. the 05 is putting out what 19 more RWHP? a street run would be close to call. but fun at that.
AzSnake said:Normal output for a Z28 and TA LT1 was in the 240RWHP range. The SS and WS6 Camaros of the time would put out closer to 260RWHP. This is when there was actually a difference between the SS and WS6 when compared to the Z28 and TA. The numbers were pretty much identical when they went to the LS1. These numbers are of course with M6's
Well, yes they do. Besides totally different motor. Different block, better heads on the LS1, better factory intake, different cam, pistons, connecting rods and a different crank. Hell even the displacement is different. The LT1 is a 350CID motor. The LS1 is not, if fact it’s less. So much for your more is better theory. The SS and WS6 cars had a different exhaust and intake with the LT1 motors. That’s what bumped them to roughly 305fwhp from the 285fwhp that came on the Z28's and TA's. In 98 when the LS1 came on board the SS and WS6 were advertised with more hp but they dynoed nearly the exact same as the Z28's and TA's. That’s one reason why it's well known that the LS1 was under rated.GTP2GTO said:240 is on the lowend...I simply said LT1 and the ss and ws6 were LT1's and so 260 whp can be used too.
So why would it make a difference with an LS1 or LT1? Do the LS1 motors respond THAT much better to an intake than the LT1s?
So if you use that I can use the Saleen Cobras, and Rousch and Steeda Cobras, Kenny Brown and even better Sean Hylands Mustangs. They even in their NA form deliver better Their not in house by Ford just like the WS6 and SS were not an in house operation for GM.I simply said LT1 and the ss and ws6 were LT1's and so 260 whp can be used too.
lopey4.6 said:Relax buddy, I have no reason to lie. I will be posting time slips and the car's dyno numbers. Hopefully this evening. I have better things to do than post garbage in this forum.
And BTW get your post count up a little more before making comments like that.
TomServo92 said:Where's your timeslips? Remember, it's BS until some proof is supplied.
EDIT: One more thing...what was the ET and MPH the very first time you ran your GTO?
NVigR8 said:The very first run was like 14 something - spun all over the place, after that, mid 13's (13.5's-13.6's) that day. I've only taken it to the track 5 or 6 times. Plus I only paid $27k plus 0% for 72 mo, so it wasn't really any more expensive than a GT 'stang.
Here's a thread about it over on ls1gto.com
http://www.ls1gto.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10371
TomServo92 said:So, in other words, you didn't get that 13.1 until you'd had some time at the wheel and had learned how to drive it in the quarter? Plus, the car had more miles on it as well, correct?
TomServo92 said:I'm not really concerned about how much you paid for it or your interest rate.
NVigR8 said:So in other words, completely stock '05 GT's (no weight reduction) will run 13.1's after they have been taken to the track 5 times and have 2000 miles on them?? I don't think its impossible just not likely.
No, but others in this thread typed something like I paid $10k more than an '05 gt, I was respnding to that.
TomServo92 said:I was just curious how you got to the 13.1. I wasn't implying anyting about the '05. However, I don't believe we've seen the best time out of a GT yet. Whether or not it will go as low as 13.1 is yet to be seen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?