• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1968 351W heads or the ET7E's

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen4785
  • Start date Start date May 26, 2004

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
May 26, 2004
#1
  • May 26, 2004
  • #1
Iv got a set of 1968 351 W heads.Would it be better to get a set of the ET7E( it think thats how it spelt) or stick with the 351W heads.
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 26, 2004
#2
  • May 26, 2004
  • #2
They must be C90E castings which would be '69 351 heads. They are significantly better than E7's. You should port the exhaust side a little. You can install larger valves for a significant improvement too. The 351 heads should have srew in studs put in and you will need to change rocker arms to the adjustable type. Additionally, you will not have the needed hole for air injection if smog is an issue in your state.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 27, 2004
#3
  • May 27, 2004
  • #3
OOPs... the E7s are better all the way .... with one exception... the E7s have smaller valves than the C9s ( 351W heads) ... yes the C9 and the D0 heads off the 351Ws USED to be thing.. when the heads were all choked up with huge EGR tubes ( not bumps) in the late 60s and early 80s!! then the E7s came out with better port and bowl designs and just a small egr bump!! Plus you will need hard seats for unleaded, possible guides, valves, of course if you go to screw in studs, and port work for the C90E heads...... the cost is FAR beyond that of doing the E7s!! and E7s will pull all kinds of power!! So, get out of the 60s!! cool??


Just me................................

Thumper
 

stock50LX

Curmudgeon
Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
1,858
0
0
University Place, WA
May 27, 2004
#4
  • May 27, 2004
  • #4
The C9's flow 20 cfm more in stock trim on the intake side than E7's. All these heads belong in the 60's. Heart shaped combustion chambers came out in the late 50's and neither of these heads even have that! I respect the opinions of Thumper, but I must respectfully disagree on this issue.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 28, 2004
#5
  • May 28, 2004
  • #5
Yes.. there are a few more cfm from the C9s, I guess the point I was trying to make was the cost of getting the few more cfm in having to machine the heads for todays fuel. My own experiance in the mid 70s , was I went .3 slower with C9s and 194/16 valves installed.. the 289s were a more powerfull head on the combo I was running then... (11:1 , solid cam). with the older heads you are going to put a lot of money in to make them work with the fuel of today!! and then you have a heaveyer head than the e7s and more money in them...??

Just me..........................

Thumper

PS... GT40s will " smoke 'em"
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
May 28, 2004
#6
  • May 28, 2004
  • #6
I agree, if you have the choice, use the later heads. I did a cost comparision between reworking a set of 70 something 302 heads, with the small, 54 cc chambers, that I have, etc, and buying used GT40s. After including installing bigger valves and seats, milling, valve job, springs, new rockers and pushrods, (and, or guideplates), modification for studs and studs, a set of iron Gt40s was cheaper! About $700, with springs, milliing, and valve job, on the car!

The GT40s bolt on with stock rocker stuff, and run easily to 6k.
 

BlueRevenge

You will know wind when it escapes from my ass.
Founding Member
Mar 13, 2002
159
0
0
Washington State
May 28, 2004
#7
  • May 28, 2004
  • #7
Old windsor heads are old school. GT-40 irons are kind of hard to find but I'd go with that. Of course, if you've got 600 laying around, buy those CNC ported E7TEs. I think powerheads (or something like) makes them. You trade in your old heads and they send you a set ported out on their CNC. Sounds like a pretty good deal.
 

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Jun 4, 2004
#8
  • Jun 4, 2004
  • #8
Im gonna look into them.The heads have already been machined,new vavle guides,new valves,new double springs,vavle spring shims,roller rockers,hardened seats installed, and everything has already been checked out.The only thing I had to pay for was to get them checked out.I like the sound of that place that will trade heads.and yeah I know there will still be some price to it.Thanks alot guys
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
98
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
809
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
Trying to decide if I should sell my 70 vert
  • Sixt9
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
167
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Sixt9
S
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
329
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?