• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2.1 and 1.7 KB

  • Thread starter Thread starter WillDuhhBeast
  • Start date Start date Nov 8, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
Nov 8, 2006
#1
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #1
What's the difference between these?



Do they make the same power?



Could someone compare and contrast them please!?
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Nov 8, 2006
#2
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #2
from what i understand the 2.1L really is just an improvement... the 1.7 was very limited in its power range and wouldnt make a lot of boost... the 2.1L will bring in boost a bit earlier and also allow for more power and boost on the top end...
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Nov 8, 2006
#3
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #3
The 2.1 can make the same boost at lower blower rpm. Basically it's just more efficient. Less parasitic loss.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Nov 8, 2006
#4
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #4
what is the top RWHP the 2.1 will support?
What is the peak efficiency PSI on it?
 

MustHang

New Member
Jul 26, 2005
17
0
0
Montreal
Nov 8, 2006
#5
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #5
All that was said plus the fact that it can produce more boost. On another forum a KB guy said it would be good to produce 4 more PSI so more power.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Nov 8, 2006
#6
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #6
it may be more efficiant but they still sell the same size pullies for it. it still seems to only have the range of 14psi on their site. that is being spun to the max too.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Nov 8, 2006
#7
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #7
What's the difference in these two KBs? The 1.7 is the one I wanted...the 2.1 is the one I need..! It's slated to get on top of my mod motor in Feb 07.
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Nov 8, 2006
#8
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #8
RoadconeTuning said:
from what i understand the 2.1L really is just an improvement... the 1.7 was very limited in its power range and wouldnt make a lot of boost... the 2.1L will bring in boost a bit earlier and also allow for more power and boost on the top end...
Click to expand...

crapola Can you believe this guy said this? The king of SuperChargers and it doesn't make much boost...?



From what I understand, they both make close to the same power but the 2.1 doesn't get as hot. And that would be about an extra ~150hp for the IC 1.7L at 9psi and the posted ratings are the same for the 2.1L but KB says maybe 5-10hp more... not much boost...? ...up to 14 psi for the 1.7L, nothing to scoff at. Engine mods are recommended for more than 400hp once you go past 9psi... (up to 14psi sucker)

 
S

saleen556

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
387
0
0
Hillsboro,OR
Nov 8, 2006
#9
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #9
They don't offer the 1.7 anymore.The 2.1 took it's place.If you plan on forging the bottom end just skip to the 2.6.Otherwise you are stuck at around 400rwhp with either a 1.7 or 2.1.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Nov 8, 2006
#10
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #10
1.7 and 2.1 produce nearly identical #s on 6-9 PSI. The 2.1L is a little more efficient when running higher boost levels (11+ PSI), though nothing significant.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Nov 8, 2006
#11
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • #11
KB went to in-house production of the SC, and changed the design of the rotors. Hence, more efficiency and less heat at the same amount of boost.
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
Nov 9, 2006
#12
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #12
Very interesting stuff.
 
S

soctty7676

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
156
0
0
Nov 9, 2006
#13
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #13
Hey GDawg, are you using the stock '98 engine/heads/intake with that KB Blower? I have a '98 GT Conv also. Any idea what kind of power you are putting out?
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Nov 9, 2006
#14
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #14
GDawg said:
crapola Can you believe this guy said this? The king of SuperChargers and it doesn't make much boost...?



From what I understand, they both make close to the same power but the 2.1 doesn't get as hot. And that would be about an extra ~150hp for the IC 1.7L at 9psi and the posted ratings are the same for the 2.1L but KB says maybe 5-10hp more... not much boost...? ...up to 14 psi for the 1.7L, nothing to scoff at. Engine mods are recommended for more than 400hp once you go past 9psi... (up to 14psi sucker)

Click to expand...


only stating what ive read on other forums.
 

TrueBlue03

Member
Dec 9, 2003
372
3
18
Bay Area, CA
Nov 9, 2006
#15
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #15
i've heard of way too many freak accidents from KB which WAS my first choice of brand for a blower....now im thinkin i'll go with a centri blower.

the mustang shop i go to has said KB is a very VERY crappy company to work with due to the fact that their superhargers have blown (aka destroyed... not a play on words) so many engines due to defects, and they are impossible to get ahold of, yet they offer to replace the customers engines and pay for the labor. when i dropped by to have some work done there were 2 stangs awaiting new engines and a 3rd on a flat bed on its way due to KB's superchargers being on the car for only a matter of a days.... anyone run into any of these problems?
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Nov 9, 2006
#16
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #16
This may sound stupid, but what is the least amount of boost you can run with the 2.1? Do they sell a pulley for like 5lbs of boost? I already have the juice, so my engine can't handle too much more lol. But I can buy a SC and when the engine blows, a VT block should handle both the juice and SC.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Nov 9, 2006
#17
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #17
the98stang said:
This may sound stupid, but what is the least amount of boost you can run with the 2.1? Do they sell a pulley for like 5lbs of boost? I already have the juice, so my engine can't handle too much more lol. But I can buy a SC and when the engine blows, a VT block should handle both the juice and SC.
Click to expand...
No, not a stupid question at all...
The base non-intercooled kit runs 6lbs. You can upgrade this with the intercooler and smaller pully down the road for more boost...
This is my plan, unless I have the funds to get the full 9lb intercooled kit right off the bat - otherwise, I'll start (and be quite happy, I think) with the non-int 6lb kit. (Coming in Feb 07)
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Nov 9, 2006
#18
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #18
twogts4us said:
No, not a stupid question at all...
The base non-intercooled kit runs 6lbs. You can upgrade this with the intercooler and smaller pully down the road for more boost...
This is my plan, unless I have the funds to get the full 9lb intercooled kit right off the bat - otherwise, I'll start (and be quite happy, I think) with the non-int 6lb kit. (Coming in Feb 07)
Click to expand...

How much power will a stock 2v GT produce with 6 lbs of boost? Does Vortech or Procharger make kits that produce 6 lbs?
 

GDawg

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,469
19
68
Nevada
Nov 9, 2006
#19
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #19
soctty7676 said:
Hey GDawg, are you using the stock '98 engine/heads/intake with that KB Blower? I have a '98 GT Conv also. Any idea what kind of power you are putting out?
Click to expand...

Stated by Kenne Bell, I should be making 375 bhp. I just got the SC w/IC @ 9psi installed at the end of this summer and all the options (as usual). I'm still doing things like installing gauges. I really won't know real numbers till Spring. But I will post Dyno and track times then.

It pulls like a bitch now and it has all sorts of lower rpm torque.

the98stang said:
This may sound stupid, but what is the least amount of boost you can run with the 2.1? Do they sell a pulley for like 5lbs of boost? I already have the juice, so my engine can't handle too much more lol. But I can buy a SC and when the engine blows, a VT block should handle both the juice and SC.
Click to expand...

On a KB I think they go as low as 6psi Non-intercooled but you can do pulley changes up to 14psi... (with intercooler) Can centrifuge superchargers claim that?
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Nov 9, 2006
#20
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #20
TrueBlue03 said:
i've heard of way too many freak accidents from KB which WAS my first choice of brand for a blower....now im thinkin i'll go with a centri blower.

the mustang shop i go to has said KB is a very VERY crappy company to work with due to the fact that their superhargers have blown (aka destroyed... not a play on words) so many engines due to defects, and they are impossible to get ahold of, yet they offer to replace the customers engines and pay for the labor. when i dropped by to have some work done there were 2 stangs awaiting new engines and a 3rd on a flat bed on its way due to KB's superchargers being on the car for only a matter of a days.... anyone run into any of these problems?
Click to expand...

You can't blame KB for blowing up engines. What defects are you speaking of? Their blower is one of the most reliable on the market.

You need to remember that ANY means of FI reduces the lifespan of a motor, but most of the time the one to blame is the one who TUNES it, not the blower itself. Just remember that you can lose a motor just as easy running a Vortech as you would running a KB. Centri versus screw makes no difference.

Look at MPH. They claim to have NEVER lost a motor using their Mongoose kits, and I for one believe them. Is it to say that their kit is superior? No. The components are basically the same as any other company that sells/installs superchargers. Rather, their TUNING accounts for their claim. BTW, they install KB's too.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Reduced power in 1st and 2nd gear
  • jimted79
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
298
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 25, 2025
Noobz347
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
97
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
B
Airaid reduction sleeve?
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
139
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
BriansNSane
B
W
intermittent start and rough, high idle. 06 gt
  • Woe06
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
234
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 7, 2026
Noobz347
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
187
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?