J666Z said:
it's funny how this EBONCEO guy only has one post... and how his one post was to heckle the kit on my car.
does it really matter how many posts he has, so if he had more posts you wouldn't complain about him?
J666Z said:
I'll admit, that the thalon one looks almost identical in the front. But does everyone realize that the kit is not available, and that when it is availble there is going to be so much body work that it IMO wouldn't be worth doing.
If I wanted to do an identical ELEANOR car, I would have done it on a 67 fastback, not on a 2005.
True but if you want to call it an 2005 eleanor, you should stick with the orginal looks otherwise its just another mustang GT with a body kit. and about it not being worth it thats not true, if you want something done right you have to put something extra to it in this case more money(or atleast thats what you keep on saying about the thalon). Your opinion says its not worth it, i say it worth it, everyone has his opinion. "quality not quantity"
In a way its like getting a 1967 Fastback adding foglights and changing the color to match the Eleanor, adding the strips and saying look i have an eleanor replica, avoid the color scheme and just call it a nice fastback, same with your car u can do a respectable eleanor replica, or you can add stuff to your wonderfull GT and still call it a GT not a fake eleanor look a like. What im trying to say is you have a nice car you can add a bodykit if u like it, it will probbly look nice, but its not a eleanor replica.
J666Z said:
Blow-By's and Cervinis and even ronaele's are all WAY better then that thalon kit simply b/c
A: they are available
B: they are resonably priced
C: they are easy to install
Before you know it, that $4500 body kit is going to cost over $10,000.
B/c it now has to be molded to the car, sections of the car have to be modified and cut, then you still gotta have it painted... But this is all just my opinion.
Plus converting an orginal mustang fastback 67-78 to an eleanor replica would require "so much body work" and "sections of the car have to be modified and cut, then you still gotta have it painted".
everyone has his own opinion, and this is just mine sorry if it sounded as negitively im not trying to offend anyone.
by the way i think Silver05GT has brought up some good points one is the one below, i kindoff agree with him
Silver05GT said:
My problem with the other kits are very minuscal, cervinis, blow by, and ronaele all give off a little too much of the ricer appeal which isnt something I enjoy to get out of a muscle car.
