• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

2010 Mustang in Detroit

  • Thread starter Thread starter zerort
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

zerort

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
183
0
16
Commerce Twp., MI
Apr 2, 2008
#1
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #1
Guys, not sure where to put this, but I saw this one today. It had a manufacturers plate on it also (hard to see in the pictures).
 

Attachments

  • 3.23.08 048b.webp
    36.1 KB · Views: 622
  • 3.23.08 049b.webp
    53.6 KB · Views: 633

zerort

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
183
0
16
Commerce Twp., MI
Apr 2, 2008
#2
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #2
Here's another good side shot
 

Attachments

  • 3.23.08 b.webp
    45.6 KB · Views: 637

05wolfkiller

Member
Sep 4, 2006
114
0
16
pearland, texas
Apr 2, 2008
#3
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #3
Looks like a body kit to me
 

frdfrst

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
178
0
0
phoenix az
Apr 2, 2008
#4
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #4
did't look like it had the inlet behind the doors.also it had the rise on the rear fenders on top wit the 69 vents on it.shure would be nice if thats the changes.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Apr 2, 2008
#5
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #5
so flared back and true fastback. Not bad I was fearing for the worse with the new revision.
 

cave diver

Member
Sep 9, 2007
81
0
7
Lake County, Florida
Apr 2, 2008
#6
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #6
That sure looks like a 2010 test mule to me, especially with the flared hump over the rear wheels. Glad you had a camera
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Apr 2, 2008
#7
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #7
Very 69 ish.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Apr 2, 2008
#8
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #8
Great capture!
Looks pretty good, but the louvers and muffler tips stick up/out too far. I just don't care for the rear of the Stang to get taller and possibly have the nose get lowered
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Apr 2, 2008
#9
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #9
Hips? It must be a girl.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Apr 2, 2008
#10
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #10
Is it just me or the visibility will be horrible with this car? it doesn't even have rear quarter windows or is that an illusion?
 
O

o0Dan0o

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
485
1
0
Apr 2, 2008
#11
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #11
Dunno, I can't see a third taillight (though there might be one there). And I would think that a test mule would still have its cammo on.
Dan
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Apr 2, 2008
#12
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #12
That's the Kenny Brown conversion. He was going to aftermarket it, but got sick. I think someone bought the design. That's definitely not the 2010, that's for sure, but I'd love to see the kit offered eventually.
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
Maryland
Apr 2, 2008
#13
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #13
That's definitely not the 2010 design. The changes in body armor are not that drastic in the camo pics I've seen. It's mostly minor front and rear changes. I've seen that kit before that DarkfireGt is talking about and I could swear that's the same kit.
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
Apr 2, 2008
#14
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #14
Here is a link to pics of the Kenny Brown CSR-69 concept. You can see it is the same. It is cool looking though.

http://www.muscularmustangs.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=26
 
6

67&05STANGS

Member
Apr 4, 2005
54
1
6
Dearborn Michigan
Apr 3, 2008
#15
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #15
Thats definitely NOT the 2010. I have seen the 2010 up close and it is nothing like the one in your picture.
 
1

1965coupe

Member
Jan 1, 2004
32
1
19
Temecula, CA
Apr 3, 2008
#16
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #16


Am I the only one that feels this way?

The car seems so "heavy" at the rear.. it is just too bulky with the added quarters and the huge spoiler..



I'm glad it's not the next generation of Mustangs.. I would be looking at other cars..
 
1

1965coupe

Member
Jan 1, 2004
32
1
19
Temecula, CA
Apr 3, 2008
#17
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #17
Why weren't you in a Mustang when taking the pictures?
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Apr 3, 2008
#18
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #18
I like it except for the vent shades on the back. I hope the next gen has hips but maybe not quite that high.
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Apr 3, 2008
#19
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #19
It reminds me of the 72/73 mustang kinda... the ass just kept getting bigger and bigger...

I hope this isn't what we have to look forward to.
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Apr 3, 2008
#20
  • Apr 3, 2008
  • #20
With gas prices we might be in for the Mustang II all over again.


But that OK I like the Mustang II
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2
2010 GT AC issue
  • 2010torchredgt
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
75
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
2010torchredgt
2
D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
132
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
187
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
R
2010 mustang gt tc issues?
  • Rookie1
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
95
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
Rookie1
R
I
2023 mustang gt fastback help
  • Izhar8709
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
139
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?