• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

2011 Stang Review!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter scupking
  • Start date Start date Mar 29, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 29, 2010
#1
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #1
Just looked at the review from Moter Trend and both the 5.0 and V6 are impressive.

5.0
0-60 = 4.3 seconds
1/4 = 12.8
60-0 in 105ft

V6
0-60 = 5.1 seconds
1/4 = 13.7
60-0 in 104 ft


Those numbers are crazy. The v6 runs about the same as the 315hp 4.6. You could easly get the v6 down into the 4 second 0-60 times and run low 13s with just basic mods. The 5.0 you could run low 12s with no problems and may be high 11s with basic mods.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
Mar 29, 2010
#2
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #2
I think with slicks and skinnies, a tune, k&n drop in filter and the driver mod the 5.0 could almost high 11s
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Mar 29, 2010
#3
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #3
....out of a naturally aspirated 5.0 L displacement car. That truly is remarkable.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 29, 2010
#4
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #4
Yes, I saw the numbers this morning too. That is very impressive for both!

Here is motortrends dyno results: Mustang Power! We Dyno the 2011 Ford Mustang 5.0 V-8 and 3.7 V-6 - Wide Open Throttle - Motor Trend Magazine
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Mar 29, 2010
#5
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #5
They are both under-rated!!!!
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Mar 29, 2010
#6
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #6
im giving up on my 98 from now on lol..
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 29, 2010
#7
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #7
Impressive numbers indeed...gotta love the new powertrains.
 

KBExperience

Active Member
Jun 21, 2009
466
1
49
Houston
Mar 29, 2010
#8
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #8
I better start that blower fund
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Mar 29, 2010
#9
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #9
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
im giving up on my 98 from now on lol..
Click to expand...

Yea....I may have to give up on my 96. Even if I add a blower....a new 5.0 with full bolt-ons will probably still cream me....
 

myponyrocks

I have more billet on the Stang than most women ha
Apr 18, 2004
1,219
0
37
Mar 29, 2010
#10
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #10
KBExperience said:
I better start that blower fund
Click to expand...

Gonna need more than that... New block or new car... I can't decide.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Mar 29, 2010
#11
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #11
imo the motor trend stang was what it is. a lighter car with less power and less torque and tiny tires.


12.8 vs 12.9 and same mph. the power to weight ratio of that run was the same. (3.73's not withstanding) sounds to me like the preimum stang tested was heavier than reported.

base weight is 3605 for a base car. those fellows buying premiums are getting more electronics, heavier heated seats, and whatever other options it has added.

so its a 412hp/390tq 3732lbs car, against a 3860lb 426hp/420tq SS.

i mean i just calculated weight. but the race is what it is. a heavy car with 412hp against a heavier car with 426hp.

the 60' were the same. the et's were .1 different, and the mph were the same. the VCT probably helped midrange.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Mar 29, 2010
#12
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #12
i ordered the lighter version for a reason. least possible weight = faster. brembos save weight. no spoiler, base car. etc.

both cars are slightly underrated. the stang tested was heavier than expected. and even with 255 p-zero's there was no traction..


everyone wait for Evan Smith to tell us what it can really do. and dyno's of stock cars. ill dyno mine after it loosens a bit.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 29, 2010
#13
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #13
Thats it I'm done moding my car. I will save up for a year or so. Try to sell mine for 10k then pick up a used 2011 when the 2012s come out. I might actually go with the v6. You probably could pick up a 2011 v6 for around 17k in 2012 (2010 v6s are around 17-18k now). I would then slap a blower on it push over 400+rwhp and get almost 30mpg. That beats my 15mpg and only 293rwhp. I think you could pick up a 2011 GT in the 2012my for around 25-28k.
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Mar 29, 2010
#14
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #14
Awesome numbers.

If only they could make the rear end of that car not look so hideous I'd probably buy one. They did everything else right, except the back. But thats just me.
 

2006KJ

New Member
Mar 29, 2010
128
0
0
North West PA
Mar 29, 2010
#15
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #15
wow! those numbers are seriously impressive... that V6 is nothing not sneeze about and the 5.0 is faster to 60 then a terminator!!! that's crazy.
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Mar 29, 2010
#16
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #16
im buying one as soon as i graduate college... 2 more years...
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Mar 29, 2010
#17
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #17
Those cars are going to sale like hot cakes over the next 3-4 years. 11 second v6 stangs at the track is coming in the near future. Ford finally nailed it, again. First time they really have since the 03-04 cobra.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Mar 29, 2010
#18
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #18
Winters98GT said:
Those cars are going to sale like hot cakes over the next 3-4 years. 11 second v6 stangs at the track is coming in the near future. Ford finally nailed it, again. First time they really have since the 03-04 cobra.
Click to expand...

I agree this is as big as the 1979 Fox and 03-04 cobra. Also this is the first time I would not mind having a V6 muscle car (though I would miss the V8 sound). I can see a lot of people pushing mid 12 second sixers (with not to many mods) and then as you said a few 11 second ones. So what do we all think Ford will do for the big 50th for the 2014MY?
 

slick35thgt

New Member
Oct 5, 2009
213
0
0
Leitchfield, KY
Mar 29, 2010
#19
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #19
I dont know whether I should be elated or disgusted!!
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Mar 30, 2010
#20
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • #20
scupking said:
Thats it I'm done moding my car.
Click to expand...

That's how I feel...except I'm going to add 4.30s, beef up the rear some and I'll be done besides some different wheels and fatter tires out back...other then that I want a new 5.0 sometime down the road. But I've poured so much money into my car and I do have a built motor now to where I could still add some mild boost down the road if I wanted...I feel I should just keep mine forever.

Def impressive what car-makers are putting out these days though.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
J
351w swap in 2004 questions (set up like a 95 Cobra)
  • jonathansw1601
  • Mar 24, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2018
jonathansw1601
J
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
2011 5.0 M6 Track Results
  • Treview1
  • Jul 10, 2012
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
814
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2012
Bojingles
Opinions On A 2013 3.7 V6 Build
  • Performance Enthusiest
  • Jan 27, 2014
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2014
the98stang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?