• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

289 Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter ras50gt
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2006

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Oct 19, 2006
#1
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #1
I finally got the 289 in the 1967 coupe, but now I need some help with connecting the hoses. Most of it is straight forward I know, but does anyone have a diagram for the hoses and vacuum lines? The car has two red hoses coming from the firewall, which is most likely for the heater, but I'm not sure where they go. There is also another hose that connects to the block on the passenger side which broke off, think this is something to do with the smog. The manual I have is pretty useless. Anyways, I wanted to get some help on this and if someone has a diagram that would be great. Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 19, 2006
#2
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #2
The 2 red hoses are the heater hoses, one goes to the front of the intake just behind the T-stat housing, the other to one of the 5/8" nipples on the waterpump, the other nipple on the pump is for the bypass hose. Either heater hose will go either way, just route them to where they fit the best, the heater will work, no matter the flow direction. No smog on a 67 289. If it's got an automatic trans, there will be one vac line to the transmission modulator valve (right rear of the trans.) one more vac hose to the distributor.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Oct 19, 2006
#3
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #3
Thanks, do you know what the hose is that was connected to the passenger side of the block, connected to the head on the side? And where the heater hoses connect, three other hoses split off from there and one of them is a large red hose with a metal at the end which has a hole, know where that goes?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 19, 2006
#4
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #4
ras50gt said:
Thanks, do you know what the hose is that was connected to the passenger side of the block, connected to the head on the side? And where the heater hoses connect, three other hoses split off from there and one of them is a large red hose with a metal at the end which has a hole, know where that goes?
Click to expand...
Not clear on what you're talking about here. Only hoses I know of would be two radiator hoses, one goes to front of the intake and to the top radiator. The bottom radiator hose goes to the waterpump inlet (bottom of the pump, could be either side, depending on the pump and radiator) two heater hoses, one bypass hose (fits between the T-stat housing on the front of the intake and one of the 5/8" nipples on the pump) , the two afore-mentioned vacuum hoses, and possibly one metal line running from the choke on the carb to the right side exhaust manifold. then finally the fuel line between the fuel pump and carb.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 20, 2006
#5
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #5
The "thingy on the firewall" you are talking about is a vaccume controlled regulator for the heater. When the vaccume is applied, (I think) it opens the valve and allows the coolant to flow through the heater core. Could be the other way around...
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Oct 20, 2006
#6
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #6
D.Hearne said:
No smog on a 67 289.
Click to expand...

Not true. California Cars starting receiving Thermactor Emissions equipment on 289 powered mustangs in 1966.
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Oct 20, 2006
#7
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #7
ras50gt said:
Thanks, do you know what the hose is that was connected to the passenger side of the block, connected to the head on the side?
Click to expand...

Sounds like a Thermactor Emissions hose.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Oct 20, 2006
#8
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #8
jtfairlane said:
Not true. California Cars starting receiving Thermactor Emissions equipment on 289 powered mustangs in 1966.
Click to expand...


Yup. Had one, got the Tshirt.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Oct 20, 2006
#9
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #9
So can i eliminate that hose then? also splitting off from that hose is a really long red hose, have no clue where the other end is suppose to connect to. There is another black one that is conneted to the unit at the rear of the intake manifold, this is where the other hoses connect too, I have no clue where this one is suppose to go either.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Oct 20, 2006
#10
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #10
jtfairlane said:
Not true. California Cars starting receiving Thermactor Emissions equipment on 289 powered mustangs in 1966.
Click to expand...

Yep..100% correct. All three of my Mustangs are Kalifornia cars each with there own air pump (now all in boxes in my garage). They also (IMO) jacked-up the heads even more by drilling holes near each exhaust port or through them for the air injection (some did it in the exhaust mainfold I believe). So all my 289 heads with air holes were replaced long ago.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Oct 20, 2006
#11
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #11
After a little more research I found out about the Thermactor Exhaust Emission Control System. Im guessing this is what the unit on top of the intake manifold is. Can I just unbolt this, take the hoses out, and then just plug the holes in the cylinder heads? Is there more to it then that? I read something about the carb choke having to be converted, no clue what that means? All the help is greatly appreciated!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 20, 2006
#12
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #12
jtfairlane said:
Not true. California Cars starting receiving Thermactor Emissions equipment on 289 powered mustangs in 1966.
Click to expand...
OK so I'll amend that to 90% of 67's had no smog.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Oct 20, 2006
#13
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #13
So, I can just take it off......
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Oct 20, 2006
#14
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #14
Please note on your calenders that D. Hearne made a mistake: this hardly ever happens so maybe we should make it a holiday. We'll call it human day. J/k
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Oct 21, 2006
#15
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #15
Yes, you can just remove it.

Looks like the big D is having an off day =P
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Oct 21, 2006
#16
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #16
D.Hearne said:
OK so I'll amend that to 90% of 67's had no smog.
Click to expand...
Don't be too quick to backtrack, my 289/C4 '68 has NO SMOG equipment whatsoever and was built in San Jose, Ca and sold new in San Rafael, Ca. I asked a buddy of mine why and he claims that 2 barrel carbed, auto-equipped cars didn't need the air pump. I don't know if that's true, but I do know another freind's '66 had a 4bbl/4 spd and gobs of smog stuff, and my parents had a '66 428/auto T-Bird and it too had miles of smog plumbing, yet my '68 never had any.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 21, 2006
#17
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #17
mustangdave said:
Please note on your calenders that D. Hearne made a mistake: this hardly ever happens so maybe we should make it a holiday. We'll call it human day. J/k
Click to expand...
It's not that I made a mistake, it's just that I usually don't consider California part of the rest of the USA. (and I am human and not perfect )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Please help with vacuum lines
  • Dawgs000082
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
68
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
Dawgs000082
D
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
205
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
268
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
Which is the correct PCV valve
  • Trogdor
  • Mar 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 18, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
422
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?