• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

289 HiPo or 302?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Renato
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2004
R

Renato

New Member
Aug 18, 2004
36
0
0
Sep 24, 2004
#1
  • Sep 24, 2004
  • #1
Greetings,

I'm in the market for a '67 or '68 Fastback and I wanted opinions/comments/feedback on the desireabilty/differences between a 289 HiPo and a 302.

Thanks in advance for any and all replies.

Best regards.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Sep 24, 2004
#2
  • Sep 24, 2004
  • #2
First, I hope you're aware that the 67-68 FB is the most popular body style now, thanks to Elenor, and that finding a car worth fixing will cost you at least $9k. The Hipo was in its last year in 1967, and production was LOW, and IIRC only 4000 or less FBs got a Hipo. The 302 didnt become technically availible until 68, you could get a standard 289 in 67 though.
HTH
--Kyle
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 24, 2004
#3
  • Sep 24, 2004
  • #3
The Hi-po will add a LOT of value to the car, and from a performance standpoint, you can easily modify a non-Hi-po to run faster.

Hi-pos are for collectors, the other cars are for fun.
 
V

VictorII

New Member
Jun 19, 2004
148
1
0
Cotati, CA
Sep 24, 2004
#4
  • Sep 24, 2004
  • #4
Renato said:
Greetings,

I'm in the market for a '67 or '68 Fastback and I wanted opinions/comments/feedback on the desireabilty/differences between a 289 HiPo and a 302.

Thanks in advance for any and all replies.

Best regards.
Click to expand...

Outside of the '65 convert. (one of which lives in my garage), the '67 F/B is my favorite body style. As for engine, I'd go for the 302. There were many made and you can find them anywhere. I even have one waiting for my next build and a third set of worked heads. But I'm in no hurry, only have 155,000 miles on this build Thank goodness for synthetic oil! On the bottom end, you can have the rods drilled for 11/32" and use ARP bolts, remove the flashing and then have them shot peened; balance the reciprocating assembly and you've got a Hipo short block, better than a Hipo really. The Hipo dampener is different but not really necessary. The heads are basically the same as non-Hipos, but you can work them too. Bigger valves, good springs, etc, a solid cam and gasket matching and the top end will be better than the Hipos. Plus you can play with intake, exhaust and ignition. And you won't be carving up a Hipo engine. The best part is that you can build an engine that will have more power. This all assumes that you don't care for originality. To get an idea of price, pick up a copy of Hemmings Motor News, there are sometimes Hipo 289s for sale (they are expensive). Hope this helps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
197
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
650
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
C
Looking for a new/rebuilt 302 Long Block
  • Charlie Allen
  • Dec 20, 2023
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
903
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 20, 2023
Charlie Allen
C
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
762
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF rebuild with no oil pressure NEED HELP
  • Falcon67
  • May 27, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
287
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2025
horse sence
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?