• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

2eighty9...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShAkE N BaKe!!
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2007

ShAkE N BaKe!!

New Member
Feb 27, 2007
144
0
0
May 27, 2007
#1
  • May 27, 2007
  • #1
how much power can a 289 make without stroking it?
 
3

351carlo

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
267
0
0
Philadelphia
May 27, 2007
#2
  • May 27, 2007
  • #2
No offense, but that is one of the most vague questions I've ever read.

I'm sure with a stout crank, 35 lbs of boost through twin turbos and a solid set of matching components one could put out over 1500 horsepower.

Stock heads? Stock rotating assembly? Doing a cam? Forced induction? Nitrous? So many possibilities.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 27, 2007
#3
  • May 27, 2007
  • #3
it will make with in about 10hp of an equally built 302.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
May 27, 2007
#4
  • May 27, 2007
  • #4
rbohm said:
it will make with in about 10hp of an equally built 302.
Click to expand...

At any power level?
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
May 27, 2007
#5
  • May 27, 2007
  • #5
I had a naturally aspirated 289 with a '65 block, '65 cast crank that was indexed (throws trued to 90* apart) and the rod journals turned down to a V6 Chevy size, but not stroked, Howards aluminum rods, TRW 12.7:1 pistons, '69 351w heads with some port work, 1.6 roller rockers, Schneider solid roller (598/608 as I recall), Offy 360 Tunnel Ram with a pair of stock Holley 660 center squirters and it had a Jerico tranny with a 5.67 spool with 30x9x15 slicks in a 3000# (with driver) car that went 11.08@119.

From Tim McAmis Race Cars horsepower calculator....

Your 69 Mustang weighs about 3000 pounds and can complete a 1/4 mile in about 11.08 seconds. That means that you've got about 435.90 HP at the wheels, and about 566.67 HP at the flywheel.

I think the wheel number is about right, but I think the flywheel number is at least 70hp too high, I think he's figuring loss on an auto tranny, a Jerico doesn't have than much parasitic loss.

I think they start splitting at about 600hp.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 27, 2007
#6
  • May 27, 2007
  • #6
brianj5600 said:
At any power level?
Click to expand...

pretty much. there is no replacement for displacement. one thing though, the power curves will lokk different, but the peak power will be higher on the larger engine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
185
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
M
  • Poll Poll
Stroking a Mexico 289 or newer roller 302
  • MaryJaneTheMustang
  • Aug 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
144
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2026
Bullitt347
N
Trying to locate 1968 Mustang
  • Newton
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
99
The Welcome Wagon Jul 1, 2026
Newton
N
6
Motor ID
  • 65er
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
226
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Noobz347
A
90 Fox Manuel steering
  • adimice
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
133
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?