• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Exhaust 3"------->2.5"

  • Thread starter Thread starter My92cashtrap
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2020

My92cashtrap

Member
May 11, 2019
53
13
18
Holland MI
Jan 16, 2020
#1
  • Jan 16, 2020
  • #1
I have mac LT headers with 3" collectors. Would i take a performance hit if i used a 3" to 2.5" collector and ran 2.5" for an X-pipe and exhaust? I'm thinking yes...

Engine is a 347.
 

Potomus Pete

I'm still waiting for the fully nude shots
5 Year Member
Mar 7, 2019
3,308
1,223
153
Sarasota Florida
Jan 16, 2020
#2
  • Jan 16, 2020
  • #2
Im thinking I doubt it. Still flows well.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,952
10,590
203
polk county florida
Jan 16, 2020
#3
  • Jan 16, 2020
  • #3
Depends on how far the engine is built.
4-500 hp I doubt much loss
600+ yeah maybe
700 + yes.
 
Reactions: fun331, Noobz347 and Gs1987GT

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 17, 2020
#4
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #4
I agree with the General on this one....

Along these lines but different, can you run MACs 3" exhaust (cat back system) with a 2.5" H-pipe?

I'm thinking about what exhaust to use with my GT this coming summer hopefully

Thanks
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Jan 17, 2020
#5
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #5
If you're still running cats, you will need hi-flow ones.
As for the cat back exhaust, I still like the sound of the Flowmaster Force II.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,952
10,590
203
polk county florida
Jan 17, 2020
#6
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #6
This is how I would run the 3" into 2 .5" exhaust , I would make the merge gradually maybe over a length of 4-6" , if running cats the merge would be after the cats.
This is not based on any actual flow data, just a cartoon in my mind.
 

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 17, 2020
#7
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #7
Blown88GT said:
If you're still running cats, you will need hi-flow ones.
As for the cat back exhaust, I still like the sound of the Flowmaster Force II.
Click to expand...

I have a bbk off road H pipe to install, no cats. Was just wondering if the mac 3" cat back would mate with the 2.5"bbk off road H pipe or if the flange size is different or not.

Sorry to take this off the OPs origional question.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,952
10,590
203
polk county florida
Jan 17, 2020
#8
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #8
3x2.5 adapter
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,158
21,331
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 17, 2020
#9
  • Jan 17, 2020
  • #9
General karthief said:
This is how I would run the 3" into 2 .5" exhaust , I would make the merge gradually maybe over a length of 4-6" , if running cats the merge would be after the cats.
This is not based on any actual flow data, just a cartoon in my mind.
Click to expand...

Yep... Give those cats as much flow as possible. Gasses will do a great deal of cooling in the converters and be more dense going out than it did coming in. This is a good place to begin reduction and maximize exhaust scavenging.

Blown88GT said:
you will need hi-flow ones.
Click to expand...

Yep!
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jan 19, 2020
#10
  • Jan 19, 2020
  • #10
3” pipes the whole way will add weight without adding much benefit for most 347’s. Even flowmaster and Hot Rod’s chart shows you need to be making at least 400 hp at that engine size to use 3” duals.

What Size Exhaust Pipes Work Best?

In this month's editon of Quick Tech, Tech Editor Marlan Davis discusses what size exhaust pipes work best.
www.hotrod.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Jul 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
116
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
360
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Friday at 7:26 AM
DadLife0724
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
795
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
7
Engine Random hanging idle
  • 706 Saleen
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
669
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?