• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

3:55 gears

  • Thread starter Thread starter nctrader77
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away"MISSOURI"
Jan 2, 2005
#41
  • Jan 2, 2005
  • #41
Arnolds97 said:
In Kansas City I had mine installed for 200.00. I think you aught to drive out and have them installed here. Even with the drive you would save 300.00?
Click to expand...


ya , i had mine done for 200 also....
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 2, 2005
#42
  • Jan 2, 2005
  • #42
Pughman said:
Numerically higher gears won't give you more power, but they will improve the way your Mustang uses what it has. The flip-side of the coin is lower top speed, but unless you cruise at 80+ mph a reasonable gear swap won't affect your regular commute.
Click to expand...

By way of clarification, it's not just top speed that suffers. The speed in every gear for any given engine RPM is also lower, including the speed at which you shift. With 3.27s, 40MPH can be had at 6000RPM in 1st. Switching to 4.10s gives only 32MPH, give or take. This is not always an advantage.

Also, "you can do more work (move the car) with less effort (torque) with a higher ratio" is not technically correct. Work is the moving of a mass through a distance D in a period T. When considering gears, one has to remember that the percentage by which wheel torque goes up is directly offset by the percentage wheel RPM goes down. In the equation rwHP=wRPM*wT/5252, the rwHP remains constant and the ability to do work remains the same.

I still wager that gears give a good "seat of the pants" feel, enable the car to claw out of the hole better and give a way to match vehicle performance to the engine characteristics (e.g. favoring higher RPM operation) but because they add no power to the mix, they don't really make the car any "faster" overall.

Won't stop me from getting some 3.73s though
 

Pughman

Member
Dec 25, 2004
295
2
18
in a galaxy far far away"MISSOURI"
Jan 2, 2005
#43
  • Jan 2, 2005
  • #43
hell i just cut and pasted it off this site .....if you know more than these guys your a god and should be working at ford ....

http://www.speedworx.com/cgi-local/shop.pl/page=boltonbasics.htm

 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 2, 2005
#44
  • Jan 2, 2005
  • #44
Anyone who thinks 4.10's put some huge dent in fuel milage: you're an idiot, plain and simple.

My experience says that NO, they don't.

My experience and others with 4.10's experience > people with stock gears sitting on their asses thinking they know how stuff works

Grow a pair, quit crying about "Oh noes, teh RPMs are to much!!!", or go buy a Civic.

codyGT said:
Why do all of the 4.10 lovers think that 3.27s suck so bad?

My 1991 GT had 2.73 w/5-speed only option was 3.08. One of my LT1's had 3.23 and another 2.73.

I myself would rather have 3.55 or 3.73 in my GT.

IMO 4.10 suck and make a nice car feel like junk. I have raced a GT w/4.10's and was unimpressed.
Click to expand...

Because I've owned both. Not "I've raced someone with 4.10's" or "My friend's friend's friend let me drive his car for 1.3 miles with 4.10's" but driven and raced both.

N/A: 4.10+

[/gear fear]
 

mhbr549

New Member
Oct 23, 2004
7
0
0
Indiana
Jan 2, 2005
#45
  • Jan 2, 2005
  • #45
4:10's here. No real noticable difference in fuel consumption. Big difference in seat of the pants feel, and off the line performance. Best friend has 3:73's in his '01, and loved them...until he drove mine. As many have said, it's all personal preference, however I think you would love the 4:10's.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
94
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
157
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
Engine Starter ring gear depth. 3/8 or 3/4 inch?
  • 92Rustang
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
347
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 22, 2025
Rcdgl
R
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
164
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
314
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?