jj2002 said:MODIFCATIONS
1) C & L PLENUM
2) C@L TURE FLOW TUBE
3) BBK 75MM THROTTLE
4) 3.73 GEARS TIRES 275/40/17
5)STEEDA TIMMING (VERY GOOD BOLT ON )
6)C@L 85 MAF
7) STEEDA PULLEYS
8) JBA Shorty Headers 1625S-1JT
9) MAGNAFLOW CATBACK
10)IGnition Solutions Plasma Booster
288 RWHP 347FT LB
jj2002 said:I have 288 RWHP on a 2002 GT just bolt on's
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MODIFCATIONS
1) C & L PLENUM
2) C@L TURE FLOW TUBE
3) BBK 75MM THROTTLE
4) 3.73 GEARS TIRES 275/40/17
5)STEEDA TIMMING (VERY GOOD BOLT ON )
6)C@L 85 MAF
7) STEEDA PULLEYS
8) JBA Shorty Headers 1625S-1JT
9) MAGNAFLOW CATBACK
10)IGnition Solutions Plasma Booster
288 RWHP 347FT LB
nickthegenius said:I will refrain from commenting.
jj2002 said:Dyno before the Plasma Booster and JBA headers-
Lets here some more dumb asssss BS before I show DYNO 2
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/howto/138_0307_plasma/
You have the know what you are doing! Alot of reading and testing- YOU are saying JBA Racing DYNO is wrong! The DYNO Shop was higher!just some guy said:ps. dude: your dyno is messed up, i have seen some high powered mustangs and none of them have ever had over 330 rwtq on a 2v without some sort of pa. id ask for a refund because your s%%% is skewwed.
GinoGT said:
Let's race! I'll take websites, you get magazines!
Go to the track. You'll find out real quick if you have 350 RWTQ or not.
jj2002 said:Lets race--- Carlsbad CA, anytime!!
jj2002 said:Dyno before the Plasma Booster and JBA headers-
Lets here some more dumb asssss BS before I show DYNO 2
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/howto/138_0307_plasma/
thanks. i have read that the 96-98 heads actually flow pretty well and they can outflow the pi heads at higher rpms. my understanding is that the main bottleneck on the 96-98s is the lower intake. swapping in a 99+ lower intake supposedly nets like 40 hp, mostly in the upper rpms.CHarris said:Black96 you do make a good point. The ability to eclipse 300 rwhp with a 302 is fairly easy and much easier on the wallet. I am sure you are not alone in your decision-making. There are quite a few ways to achieve this mark naturally aspirated with the old smallblock.....an example to just how choked up the 5.0s were with factory components! Ashame they never really received the graces from Ford the 4.6 engines enjoy today.
The 4.6 2V is fairly optimal and a good performer from the factory, sure there is room for improvement, but because they are already efficient and Ford gave them the ability to breathe well in stock trim, makes the quest for finding considerable power gains a little harder using simple bolt-ons. This would also explain why they respond so well to supercharging in stock configuration.
jj2002 said:You have the know what you are doing! Alot of reading and testing- YOU are saying JBA Racing DYNO is wrong! The DYNO Shop was higher!
http://www.cnlperformance.com/plenum04.html
nickthegenius said:My best guess is that JBA wanted to show you just how delightfully splendid their headers are.
I wonder if Comp Cams had an in-house dyno and I took my car there if I would get like 537rwhp/794rwtq since I have Comp Cams?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?