• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

302 Efi Hood Clearance

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert fugate
  • Start date Start date Jan 27, 2014

robert fugate

Active Member
Oct 1, 2012
103
25
39
valdosta ga
Jan 27, 2014
#1
  • Jan 27, 2014
  • #1
My dads sticking my old 302 into 1969.. efi with the explorer intake.. Problem is with that intake and the valve covers i had to run a 1" spacer to clear them.. Will he have a clearance issue? Thanks
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,194
8,027
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Jan 27, 2014
#2
  • Jan 27, 2014
  • #2
The 5.0 Thunder Bird and Cougar and Mustang will clear with no problems ,not sure what intake is on the Explorer.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 28, 2014
#3
  • Jan 28, 2014
  • #3
i believe the explorer intake is very similar to the mustang and tbird intakes, as well as the crown vic intake. its the F150 intake that is tall as heck.
 

robert fugate

Active Member
Oct 1, 2012
103
25
39
valdosta ga
Jan 28, 2014
#4
  • Jan 28, 2014
  • #4
Yes its real similar.. Its basically a cobra copy. Thanks for the reply!
 

no1hedberg

Member
Aug 5, 2013
33
1
9
Jan 31, 2014
#5
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #5
According to Ron Morris Performance who specializes in EFI conversions the stock 87-93 5.0 intake is 11 inches tall. The 94-95 intake is 9.5 inches tall. The 95-01 Explorer intake is 11.5 inches tall. I would assume the tubular GT-40 and the 93 Cobra would be similar in height to the Explorer intake as they are identical inside. I have seen plenty of pictures of people using different variations of the gt40. I don't know how much spacer you need, efi short valve covers should aleviate the need for a spacer. Maybe if you run in to problems with the 1 inch spacer you could try a 1/2 inch. I hope this helps.
 

robert fugate

Active Member
Oct 1, 2012
103
25
39
valdosta ga
Jan 31, 2014
#6
  • Jan 31, 2014
  • #6
1" is the smallest we can run with the valve covers.. were gonna go for it and see. Thanks for the replys
 

robert fugate

Active Member
Oct 1, 2012
103
25
39
valdosta ga
Feb 1, 2014
#7
  • Feb 1, 2014
  • #7
no1hedberg i just re-read you post.. not sure you understand. I was asking if we would have clearance issues with the hood being the intake would be 1" higher then stock
 

no1hedberg

Member
Aug 5, 2013
33
1
9
Feb 7, 2014
#8
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #8
I'm not sure about the fit, that's why I quoted the info from Ron Morris. I guess what I was getting at is if you get it in there and it doesn't fit under the hood one option would be to use shorter efi valve covers, and take the spacer out to get a little extra room to clear the hood.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
135
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
736
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
129
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
295
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
M
Inheriting (and likely restoration of) a 1965 Mustang
  • miniwheats235
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
234
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2026
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?