• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 stroked or 347

  • Thread starter Thread starter RipplyStorm
  • Start date Start date Oct 13, 2008

RipplyStorm

New Member
Oct 13, 2008
1
0
0
Oct 13, 2008
#1
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #1
Ok guys I have a 1991 lx with a 302 stock motor. ( Except for the smoke converter)
I was thinking about either building a 347 from the ground up or stroking my motor to a 347.
Which do you think is the better of the two?
My engine is VERY reliable. It has never even hesitated to start. I dont want to loose that if I stroke it. Will I?
What do you think?
Thanks
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Oct 13, 2008
#2
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #2
RipplyStorm said:
I was thinking about either building a 347 from the ground up or stroking my motor to a 347.
Click to expand...

I think it would be the same thing.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Oct 13, 2008
#3
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #3
to :SNSign:

Building one from the ground up would give you the advantage of less down time, but the end product would be the same. I'd likely go that route, so I could just swap and be done. That's what I did with my Explorer engine, minus the stroker part anyway.

Also:
Welcome to the Fox Engine Swap Shop! Read this before posting in this forum.

Moved to 5.0 Tech
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Oct 13, 2008
#4
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #4
The question doesnt really make any sense buddy. Its either you want your "reliable" 302 or you want a 347 stroker. If you do a stroker, your gonna be puttin all new parts in it and getting alot of machine wrok a prep done. In the long run, its cheaper just to buy a brand new build 347 stroker short block.
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Oct 13, 2008
#5
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #5
Keep ypur engine and build a complete new one, as stated above no down time ecept for the complete engine swap. And prolly cheaper.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Oct 13, 2008
#6
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #6
ShortThrow50 said:
The question doesnt really make any sense buddy. Its either you want your "reliable" 302 or you want a 347 stroker. If you do a stroker, your gonna be puttin all new parts in it and getting alot of machine wrok a prep done. In the long run, its cheaper just to buy a brand new build 347 stroker short block.
Click to expand...

+1

a 347 IS a bored and stroked 302. i agree, if you have a good running motor, leave it and buy a 347 shortblock and build it on the side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
90
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
181
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?