• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 to 351 swap (302 efi - 351 carb'd or efi?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter charlesw6954
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2003
C

charlesw6954

Founding Member
May 3, 2002
476
0
0
40
Mo
Dec 29, 2003
#1
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #1
i am starting a new and better paying job in february. i have found a 351 windsor motor pretty cheap. its knocking but thats fixable. i would like to just throw on an intake, carb, holley blue fuel pump, and replace what needs fixing. mostly because i just love carb. i know switching my 302 efi to carb would just loose torque. so i just want to get a bigger cubed engine and throw on a carb.

i know i have to replace the oil pan. would i have to replace the motor mounts? anything else that would need replacing? i doubt my aftermarket headers on my 302 would fit on the 351, but owell i got a reason to throw on some l/t's.

im not expecting to get the 351 in the car asap. i just want to have some fun building it up. if i did do it carb'd i would have a holley carb (what cfm?), edelbrock victor jr intake manifold.

the ****ty part about this is the transmission. i blew the stock t-5 and had no money to buy another stock t-5. so i found a 4 cyclinder t-5 that since today shifts so fing nice. i paid only 75 bucks (also had to replace the clutch). so the torque of the 351 would just kill the tranny unless i went really easy.

as of right now i have no aftermarket suspension. the stock suspension has just been too great for me so i have had no desire to go aftermarket.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
45
Jefferson, WI
Dec 29, 2003
#2
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #2
Not to burst your bubble, but unless you really plan on building up the 351 (heads, cam, intake/carb), don't waste your time. The 302 in your car has more potential as it sits than a 351W you pulled out of a '75 country squire wagon. Most 351W engines you find will have ****ty stock heads that are barely adequate on a 302 and have a cam to match.
 
C

charlesw6954

Founding Member
May 3, 2002
476
0
0
40
Mo
Dec 29, 2003
#3
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #3
then ill just build the engine up heads/cam/intake. ill just take the time
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
45
Jefferson, WI
Dec 29, 2003
#4
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #4
That's all fine and good, but you might want to do a little research on the topic before you run out and buy and begin building a motor. What do you plan to run for a tranny? You may be happy with your current suspension as it sits, but you probably won't be when you drop a heaver engine into the car.
Unless you are leaning towards an all out drag application, you might want to rethink what you're doing. There's a good reason that 95% of the people on this forum or better have stuck with the 5.0L engine.
 
D

D347643

Banned
Jan 28, 2003
1,095
0
0
portland, OR
Dec 29, 2003
#5
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #5
hey now, 351w have tons of potental and the dont weigh "that" much more. Plus talk about torque, try stroking a 5.8 to over 400 cubes. nothing like a 6.5 liter engine under your hood. Plus if it was carburated, shiiiiiiit watch out.

Drew
 
C

Chaser

New Member
Dec 8, 2001
14
0
0
43
Jacksonville,FL
Dec 29, 2003
#6
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #6
NKau said:
Not to burst your bubble, but unless you really plan on building up the 351 (heads, cam, intake/carb), don't waste your time. The 302 in your car has more potential as it sits than a 351W you pulled out of a '75 country squire wagon. Most 351W engines you find will have ****ty stock heads that are barely adequate on a 302 and have a cam to match.
Click to expand...


The 351W has MUCH more potential than a 302. Don't worry about your suspension, replace it down the road as it wears out. Yes you will need good heads to make good power but thats true for any motor. A t5 will work if you baby it but before you put that motor in you may want to start pricing some tremec's. Your 302 headers will not work.

Heres a link that should help with what you will need for the swap.


http://home.globalcrossing.net/~lsh/351swap/351parts.htm
 
C

charlesw6954

Founding Member
May 3, 2002
476
0
0
40
Mo
Dec 29, 2003
#7
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #7
i have researched getting a 351 in my old 84 mustang, but with my 89 its different because its efi. yea i dont really see how a 351 could be that much heavier but it is. i plan on wanting to get a very tough tko.

before i get the 351 up and running i will start to add aftermarket suspension
 
C

Chaser

New Member
Dec 8, 2001
14
0
0
43
Jacksonville,FL
Dec 30, 2003
#8
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #8
It is not that difficult to go from an efi setup to a carb setup, also long as your suspension is not worn out from high mileage I wouldnt worry about it too much unless its just something that you want to do. And I do not remember exactly how much heavier a 351 is but it is not that much more than a 302. Maybe 100-200 pound difference.
 
D

D347643

Banned
Jan 28, 2003
1,095
0
0
portland, OR
Dec 30, 2003
#9
  • Dec 30, 2003
  • #9
noo way a 351 weighs 200 pounds more, not even 150 pounds more. My dad and i picked it up and walked it to the backyard and into the shed pretty easily. I seriously would guess MAXIMUM 100 pounds more than a 302, i had a 94 roller block 5.8. If it was 150 pounds more then i dont think we would have been able to carry it, no way.

thanks,

Drew
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
224
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
105
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
212
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
718
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?