• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

347 carb...a new question...

  • Thread starter Thread starter synthartist69
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2011
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 7, 2011
#1
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #1
Hey guys,

I appreciate everyones input on my last thread regarding a carb for my 347. Today I discovered that I need to put a new bearing kit in my rear end. I have chosen to change the ring and pinion while I am in there. I am swapping the 3.00 for a 3.55. I chose the 3.55 because I want my rpms around 2,150 at 70 mph and no higher. The calculators show that this is the gear I want. I want to see if the opinions on running my holley 750 vac sec is different now. I already own this carb and cannot send it back so I am hoping to be able to use it. Here is my new set up. Thank you in advance for your advice!

This will be a street/highway racer....no dragstrip. Here is the set up...

1965 mustang GT350 tribute

347 block
Ford Racing F303 Cam
Hipo manifolds...for now (headers later)
Pro Comp castings
2.02 exhaust 1.90 intake
Performer Rpm intake
3.40 rear end
T5Z 5 speed (,63 5th gear)
 

robbz28

Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
19
Epps, LA
Apr 7, 2011
#2
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #2
If anything that probably helped you....just because you have a 750, the beauty of a vacuum secondary is that, that carb is only going to give you the CFM's you need....80% of the time you will be running around on the front 2 barrels, which is approx 375 cfm. Bigger gears = Bigger load on the engine and the engine might require those CFM's more now than they did. IMO
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 7, 2011
#3
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #3
robbz28 said:
If anything that probably helped you....just because you have a 750, the beauty of a vacuum secondary is that, that carb is only going to give you the CFM's you need....80% of the time you will be running around on the front 2 barrels, which is approx 375 cfm. Bigger gears = Bigger load on the engine and the engine might require those CFM's more now than they did. IMO
Click to expand...


That works for me! Now the main thing missing here is headers but they will have to wait a few months.
 

NMEMJCM

Member
Nov 10, 2009
83
2
6
Long Beach CA
Apr 7, 2011
#4
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #4
I had your setup a few years back (youe gear choice and a 750 carb). Was not good on the street. Swapped to a 650 and the car ran much nicer. Been there done that. I would sell your 750 and buy a 650, world of difference.... and you dont get that gas smell as bad (rob is right, the 750 will work, its just a bit much for your application and therefore not the best choice). Heck, I have a 650 on my 347 now, and I have 380 end gears and it runs great! Just relaying my experience to ya.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 7, 2011
#5
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #5
If you have 4.11's Id still say a 650
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Apr 7, 2011
#6
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #6
with a 347, id run a real 4150 like one from prosystems
 

restomoded66

Member
Mar 29, 2010
39
0
6
Apr 7, 2011
#7
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #7
synthartist69 said:
Hey guys,

I appreciate everyones input on my last thread regarding a carb for my 347. Today I discovered that I need to put a new bearing kit in my rear end. I have chosen to change the ring and pinion while I am in there. I am swapping the 3.00 for a 3.40. I chose the 3.40 because I want my rpms around 2,000 at 70 mph and no higher. The calculators show that this is the gear I want. I want to see if the opinions on running my holley 750 vac sec is different now. I already own this carb and cannot send it back so I am hoping to be able to use it. Here is my new set up. Thank you in advance for your advice!

This will be a street/highway racer....no dragstrip. Here is the set up...

1965 mustang GT350 tribute

347 block
Ford Racing F303 Cam
Hipo manifolds...for now (headers later)
Pro Comp castings
2.02 exhaust 1.90 intake
Performer Rpm intake
3.40 rear end
T5Z 5 speed (,63 5th gear)
Click to expand...

Hi! I have to question your choice on gear. most trans shop recommend 3.73 gear with a t5z. I had 3.55 gear in my 66 with a t5z also, found it a bit to tall. I have put 3.89 gear in now but have not driven it yet.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Apr 7, 2011
#8
  • Apr 7, 2011
  • #8
I am running 3.73 rear gears with my 347,T5 and 670cfm carb. Super responsive on the streets and very comfortable on the highway in 5th gear. I don't have a tach yet sadly so couldn't tell you the rpm at 70.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 8, 2011
#9
  • Apr 8, 2011
  • #9
NMEMJCM said:
I had your setup a few years back (youe gear choice and a 750 carb). Was not good on the street. Swapped to a 650 and the car ran much nicer. Been there done that. I would sell your 750 and buy a 650, world of difference.... and you dont get that gas smell as bad (rob is right, the 750 will work, its just a bit much for your application and therefore not the best choice). Heck, I have a 650 on my 347 now, and I have 380 end gears and it runs great! Just relaying my experience to ya.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the advice!
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 8, 2011
#10
  • Apr 8, 2011
  • #10
restomoded66 said:
Hi! I have to question your choice on gear. most trans shop recommend 3.73 gear with a t5z. I had 3.55 gear in my 66 with a t5z also, found it a bit to tall. I have put 3.89 gear in now but have not driven it yet.
Click to expand...

The goal has been to keep the highway rpms around 2,000. However, I have now decided to go with the 3.55 ratio. According to the calculator it should put me around 2,150 at 70mph.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 8, 2011
#11
  • Apr 8, 2011
  • #11
clement said:
with a 347, id run a real 4150 like one from prosystems
Click to expand...

Prosystem's is definitely a good way to go. Patrick's customer service is one of the best IMO. If your buying a carb its only a few bucks more really to get a carb setup around your build.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 11, 2011
#12
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #12
blown65 said:
Prosystem's is definitely a good way to go. Patrick's customer service is one of the best IMO. If your buying a carb its only a few bucks more really to get a carb setup around your build.
Click to expand...


The local dyno shop is pointing me towards a 650 double pumper as well. This may be the way to go over the 750 vac sec.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 11, 2011
#13
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #13
jcode68 said:
I am running 3.73 rear gears with my 347,T5 and 670cfm carb. Super responsive on the streets and very comfortable on the highway in 5th gear. I don't have a tach yet sadly so couldn't tell you the rpm at 70.
Click to expand...

Depending on your tire size, I would think that you are between 2150 and 2350 at 70mph. It mostly depends on if you have a T5 or a T5Z. The T5 as you probably know has a .68 final drive and the T5Z has a .63. It is enough to give you about a 150 to 175 rpm difference in 5th gear.
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 11, 2011
#14
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #14
jcode68 said:
I am running 3.73 rear gears with my 347,T5 and 670cfm carb. Super responsive on the streets and very comfortable on the highway in 5th gear. I don't have a tach yet sadly so couldn't tell you the rpm at 70.
Click to expand...

Ok, I see now that you have the T5Z! Nice mustang!
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 11, 2011
#15
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #15
NMEMJCM said:
I had your setup a few years back (youe gear choice and a 750 carb). Was not good on the street. Swapped to a 650 and the car ran much nicer. Been there done that. I would sell your 750 and buy a 650, world of difference.... and you dont get that gas smell as bad (rob is right, the 750 will work, its just a bit much for your application and therefore not the best choice). Heck, I have a 650 on my 347 now, and I have 380 end gears and it runs great! Just relaying my experience to ya.
Click to expand...

I appreciate the input and I think you guys have nailed it on the head!
 
S

synthartist69

Member
Dec 3, 2009
34
0
6
Apr 11, 2011
#16
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #16
NMEMJCM said:
I had your setup a few years back (youe gear choice and a 750 carb). Was not good on the street. Swapped to a 650 and the car ran much nicer. Been there done that. I would sell your 750 and buy a 650, world of difference.... and you dont get that gas smell as bad (rob is right, the 750 will work, its just a bit much for your application and therefore not the best choice). Heck, I have a 650 on my 347 now, and I have 380 end gears and it runs great! Just relaying my experience to ya.
Click to expand...

Very much appreciated!
I bet the 3.80 ratio pulls pretty hard huh?
 

NMEMJCM

Member
Nov 10, 2009
83
2
6
Long Beach CA
Apr 11, 2011
#17
  • Apr 11, 2011
  • #17
Yah its nice... I suffer a little more on the freeway (65mph at 2500 rpm) than other cars with 3.50 (or 3.55) but its a kick in the butt when Im tryin to make it threw the stale green or fresh yellow lights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
508
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
314
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
770
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
446
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
542
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?