• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

347 Induction Configuration help needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter DonMaximo
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2007
D

DonMaximo

Member
Sep 25, 2003
217
5
19
Lewisville, Texas
Aug 8, 2007
#1
  • Aug 8, 2007
  • #1
I have a 347 crate engine coming in. The builder will break-in and Dyno test the engine. They advertise producing 455ft.lbs. / 435HP.

I've sent out my GT-40 upper/lower intake to the Extrude hone people who say that process could add 20-30 HP to the total output.

I will not use any power adders. I will use a Tremec TKO 600 5-Spd, 373 gears, long tubes, X-pipe, cat backs. Car will be a Daily driver and will be subject to Texas state inspections.

I'm seeking experienced input on what size Induction/Injector components to use for the following parts:

-MAF
-Throttle body
- EGR Spacer
- Injector size

Any input on how to tune the ECU would be helpful.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

-D
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Aug 8, 2007
#2
  • Aug 8, 2007
  • #2
75mm MAF,70mm Tb same on the EGR spacer, and 30lb injectors
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#3
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #3
yea i would say 30lb injectors, 70mm TB & EGR, and maybe a bigger MAF...like 80mm. Make sure the injectors are ford pieces, and the MAF is P-MAS. Accufab is the best name in throttle bodies...but they are pricey!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 9, 2007
#4
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #4
75mm tb port matched to the manifold inlet, 30's, 80mm pro m.
 

jcw88

Never played w/ it before so i'm still a virgin!
Mar 20, 2007
53
0
0
fernandina, fl
Aug 9, 2007
#5
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #5
i'm running 36lbs, 80mm maf and a 80mm intake. i want to go up to 42lbs. but i have stage III heads and jumbo fuel rails.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 9, 2007
#6
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #6
What? nobody is gonna tell him the intake is "too small". I feel for what that cost ya though.................
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Aug 9, 2007
#7
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #7
I would think that an extrude honed gt-40 would be just as good if not better than a TFS intake...but you're the expert on that subject. Whats the verdict? Extrude Honed Gt-40 or TFS street heat?!
 
S

smallstang393

Member
Oct 18, 2004
75
0
6
Aug 9, 2007
#8
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #8
tmoss said:
What? nobody is gonna tell him the intake is "too small". I feel for what that cost ya though.................
Click to expand...

+1 on intake to small
maybe a Holley Systemax would work better for the combo
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 9, 2007
#9
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #9
Extrude hone does not take that much material out - and they cannot control WHERE they take material out either. There is a tech article on my website regarding EH.

Which is better? What is the HP and rpm band you want to make it in? It's all relative to the goals. The ported GT40 may make more power in the low-mid range and the larger section TF may make more top end - but guess what - the CAM has a BIG part to say in that as does the exhaust system and all realted parts of a coordinated package.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 9, 2007
#10
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #10
80mm MAF, 70mm TB with 70mm EGR spacer, and 30 lb injectors...
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Aug 9, 2007
#11
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #11
I will be running a 70mm TB, 42lb inj., 90mm MAF with my Dart 347, but it will have TFS TW heads with an Eddy EFI Victor 5.0 int.and custom cam. I also had a GT-40 intake that I was going to reuse, but after hours of research of others engine combo's, and about a hundred questions for ( rick91gt ) the guy building my motor... on intakes I ended up with the Victor 5.0 I found mine used for 350$.

honestly, the TFS-R intake may have been a slightly better choice, but I hate the way they look, plus Rick had good things to say about both.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Aug 9, 2007
#12
  • Aug 9, 2007
  • #12
smallstang393 said:
+1 on intake to small
maybe a Holley Systemax would work better for the combo
Click to expand...

That holley is bad a** on a 347. But i think the gt40 with some work will do just fine. Out of the boxs there good for 400hp. After its honed, I would have it matched to the heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
7K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Engine 347 Supercharge Planning
  • HeatShield
  • Oct 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2021
Haste347
H
R
Help Needed! 95 5.0
  • Riley McCallum
  • Aug 30, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 30, 2018
Riley McCallum
R
N
Need 5.0 engine rebuild advice for CA
  • NO TESLA 4ME
  • Apr 5, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 5, 2019
NO TESLA 4ME
N
Upgrading my 347 feedback
  • robo
  • Apr 8, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2018
robo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?