• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

347 stroker kit

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19mustangGT97
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2003

19mustangGT97

New Member
Feb 12, 2003
122
0
0
Foster City, CA
Dec 18, 2003
#1
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #1
I was just wondering what kind of power gains you would see with a stock
1995 gt. The kit is from dss racing. thanks.
 

DavidF

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
158
0
0
Ventura, Ca
Dec 18, 2003
#2
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #2
Well if you just use a 347 short block with everything else stock youll probably gain about 45hp.
 
6

67stang390

New Member
May 29, 2003
379
0
0
Seattle, WA(home) ASU(college)
Dec 18, 2003
#3
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #3
You would probably gain around 20 hp, 30 or 35 ft/lbs of torque. You would not gain 45 hp, that's like gaining an hp per added cubic inch. That kind of gain would not be seen on an otherwise stock motor. You need all the complimentary parts to let that motor breath. Bigger heads, cam, intake, free-flowing exhaust... Simply upping the displacement won't give you very big gains.
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 18, 2003
#4
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #4
Yeah what 67stang390 said. You wont see huge gains but I think you'll see more torgue than anything. If your on a budget like most of us. Start out with a 347 and get the stock stuff ported. That way when you do get heads, cam, and intake. You'll notice better gains with each additional mod.
 

19mustangGT97

New Member
Feb 12, 2003
122
0
0
Foster City, CA
Dec 18, 2003
#5
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #5
cool, thanks for the replys
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Dec 18, 2003
#6
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #6
i wouldnt even do a 347 without doing h/c/i. If you did, i would guarentee that you would be dissapointed with all that work you did with lil gains.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Dec 18, 2003
#7
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #7
If you need a new motor, I'd say go for it. May as well go bigger, wouldn't hurt anything. New parts on down the road would open up a lot more power.

As, just a performance upgrade, not such a prudent start.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Dec 19, 2003
#8
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #8
Someon on this forum has a 331 stroker with mostly stock parts, anyone know his username?
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Dec 19, 2003
#9
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #9
I don't even know if 20rwhp will be seen, unless the stock shortblock is in really bad shape with lots of blow-by. Your peak numbers will more than likely drop in rpm a good bit as well. Like was said, if you have to replace it anyway, its not a bad idea, but don't expect much at all.
 

DavidF

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
158
0
0
Ventura, Ca
Dec 19, 2003
#10
  • Dec 19, 2003
  • #10
67stang390 said:
You would probably gain around 20 hp, 30 or 35 ft/lbs of torque. You would not gain 45 hp, that's like gaining an hp per added cubic inch. That kind of gain would not be seen on an otherwise stock motor. You need all the complimentary parts to let that motor breath. Bigger heads, cam, intake, free-flowing exhaust... Simply upping the displacement won't give you very big gains.
Click to expand...

Yeah your right, I got mixed up on an article I read a while back. They got 24hp with 40 ft/ lbs of torque.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Dec 20, 2003
#11
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #11
In 2005 Im going to go w/ a 331 Stroker Short block from DSS Racing. Only reason b/c I plan on putting alot of power to the rear wheelsw/ a power adder and I dont want any issues w/ my current block that is creaping up on 120,000 Miles. A 331 Short block is about $2,500, TW Heads $995, TFS Stage 2 cam $150ish, and I already have the Intake done, plus ods and ends like water pump, harmonic ballancer, and timming chain. So over all you will save money building a Short block VS a Long block. If I were you I would mod your current motor, Heads, Cam, Intake and then upgrade to a 347 or 331 if you feel like you need to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
New here, 1967 getting an efi 348 stroker.
  • Weeman348
  • Mar 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
158
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2026
Weeman348
W
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
131
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
677
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
K
Mustang tire size
  • Konstang
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
171
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
revhead347
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
181
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?