• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351w headers and comments

  • Thread starter Thread starter spade33
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2007
S

spade33

New Member
Nov 14, 2006
198
0
0
Tempe, Arizona
May 24, 2007
#1
  • May 24, 2007
  • #1
so i have been debating doing a 351w swap for my 66 mustang and i know it might be a little much for now a days but it would cost me about the same amount of money as to do a 302 swap into my car if i bout a engine kit from PAW engine parts and that way when i decide to go insain i will have a good solid starting point so i have been debating it. my question is the headman swap headers say that they will not work with a toploader tranny. what is the reason for this and could they be made to work because the hooker super comp headers are a little expencive and if i dont have to use them i would rather not also could a toploader 4 speed hold up to the torque of a 351w..i know there are alot of forms on about the swap and i have been looking them over the last few days nad could not find the information i wanted. i know alot of people are against it because of the tight fit and the extra weight but i still think it would be fun but anywas just let me know what you guys think and i would be glad to hear it thanks again :SNSign:


ps. the car is a 66 coupe with a toploader 4 speed and a 289 and i believe a 8 inch rear end but i do not know for sure or how to check so any info on that too woudl be sweet
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 24, 2007
#2
  • May 24, 2007
  • #2
spade33 said:
so i have been debating doing a 351w swap for my 66 mustang and i know it might be a little much for now a days but it would cost me about the same amount of money as to do a 302 swap into my car if i bout a engine kit from PAW engine parts and that way when i decide to go insain i will have a good solid starting point so i have been debating it. my question is the headman swap headers say that they will not work with a toploader tranny. what is the reason for this and could they be made to work because the hooker super comp headers are a little expencive and if i dont have to use them i would rather not also could a toploader 4 speed hold up to the torque of a 351w..i know there are alot of forms on about the swap and i have been looking them over the last few days nad could not find the information i wanted. i know alot of people are against it because of the tight fit and the extra weight but i still think it would be fun but anywas just let me know what you guys think and i would be glad to hear it thanks again :SNSign:


ps. the car is a 66 coupe with a toploader 4 speed and a 289 and i believe a 8 inch rear end but i do not know for sure or how to check so any info on that too woudl be sweet
Click to expand...

The truth is that there is no readily available 351w swap header that fits perfectly in the 65/66 engine bay. The engine compartment is very narrow and these engines are an afterthought for the very early Mustangs. Each header manufacturer will have its quirks. Some do not cover the 4 speed because there is not much room to bend the tubes to allow for the factory z-bar.

I have used both Tubular Automotive and Accufab headers and know their limitations. The TA's just plain suck for fit. The Accufab's fit OK, but are not the perfect solution. As I said, I doubt that you will find a perfect solution from any of the handfull of manufacturers of the swap headers. It literally takes me 2 hours to remove OR install the Z-bar in my Accufabs. There just isn't much room for 4 header tubes, the engine block, the steering box, and the Z-bar to all route through the same area. The ground clearance I have with my Accufabs borders on phenomenal, so I that is the main reason I recommend them on the forums. I like the fact that although they are hard to install, once in, I can forget that they are there.

Lets play find my Z-bar:












If the thought of dealing with the swap headers turns you off and you are going to be building for less than 425hp, I suggest taking your 289 and building a 347. Their lighter rotating mass makes for a very fast and fun accelerating car. All the 289 external parts will fit perfectly and you have a much wider assortment of headers available.

As far as the strength of the toploader, don't worry. As long as you don't have one of the very early (and fortunately quite rare) 25 spline output shafts, it will take tons of abuse. The same basic tranny was used behind the Boss 409, the Boss 302, and the 428CJ. The ONLY mechanical differences were the enlarged input and output shafts, which you won't need unless you are putting 500 or more HP to the ground. These puppies are tough. If you should break the toploader, all parts are readily available through some good internet sources.

As far as how to check for a 9", if you can place a deep socket on the lower mounting bolts, it is a 8". If there is no way, then you have an 9". The 8" will live for quite awhile behind a 351w or a 347 until you try to install sticky tires. Then a 9" is your friend. Visit Kevinstang's site for some info on 9" ID. Here is one of his pics that show the mounting bolts I mentioned:


 

Iamdiffrnt

Member
Nov 13, 2005
197
6
19
South of Detroit, MI
May 24, 2007
#3
  • May 24, 2007
  • #3
Just a correction on that last post, If you can get a deep socket on the bolts pointed out (as in a clear straight shot to them) you have an 8 inch, if you can't (because the housing where the yoke is drops down and is in the way) Then you have a 9 inch. I believe that is a 9 inch in the photo.

As always please correct me if I have been misinformed.

EDIT: Also the 8 inch isn't as round where it mounts to the housing (kinda squared off a little)
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 24, 2007
#4
  • May 24, 2007
  • #4
Iamdiffrnt said:
Just a correction on that last post, If you can get a deep socket on the bolts pointed out (as in a clear straight shot to them) you have an 8 inch, if you can't (because the housing where the yoke is drops down and is in the way) Then you have a 9 inch. I believe that is a 9 inch in the photo.

As always please correct me if I have been misinformed.

EDIT: Also the 8 inch isn't as round where it mounts to the housing (kinda squared off a little)
Click to expand...

Dooh!!!!!!!!!!

Brainfart.

You are correct--a 9" requires removing the lower bolts with a wrench. I have made the correction in my original post to future proof it.

Thanks!
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 24, 2007
#5
  • May 24, 2007
  • #5
dennis112 said:
The Accufab's fit OK, but are not the perfect solution. As I said, I doubt that you will find a perfect solution from any of the handfull of manufacturers of the swap headers. It literally takes me 2 hours to remove OR install the Z-bar in my Accufabs. There just isn't much room for 4 header tubes, the engine block, the steering box, and the Z-bar to all route through the same area. The ground clearance I have with my Accufabs borders on phenomenal, so I that is the main reason I recommend them on the forums. I like the fact that although they are hard to install, once in, I can forget that they are there.
Click to expand...

Few questions:

What size primary pipe?
Looks like 1.625"... or are they larger/smaller?
Is there a site for these headers?
Ballpark price?

Thanks
Dave
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 24, 2007
#6
  • May 24, 2007
  • #6
Oh, BTW:
Crites Restorations is now making swap headers with big tubes.
1.75" primary.
I believe they are marketed for 65-66 Stangs and 71-77 Mavericks with 351w.
On the Maverick board there have already been a couple sets installed (Maverick guys have even fewer 351w swap headers than 65-66 Stangers).
They have been getting much positive reviews.
Crites also claims they will fit a 289-302 also...
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
May 24, 2007
#7
  • May 24, 2007
  • #7
the heddman headers actually aren't all that hard to get in... loosen the motor mounts so you can rock the motor back and forth a bit, but they do go in without a whole ton of trouble.

they're not the most aggressive headers, but they work, and are longtubes.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
May 25, 2007
#8
  • May 25, 2007
  • #8
ratio411 said:
Few questions:

What size primary pipe?
Looks like 1.625"... or are they larger/smaller?
Is there a site for these headers?
Ballpark price?

Thanks
Dave
Click to expand...

Advertised as 1 3/4" primary. I never measured them, but they are big. http://www.accufabracing.com/exhaust.htm

Price has recently gone up--$529 for the BT110 used in the 65/66 351w swap.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 25, 2007
#9
  • May 25, 2007
  • #9
one more addition to the rear end id question, if you have a rear end that looks similar to the one if the photo(that one is a 9" note the scalloped edges) and you can put a socket on the lower two bolts indicated in the picture, then you have a 9 3/8" rear end. the pumpkins will swap though, but just be aware of that.
 
H

hgufrin

New Member
Mar 15, 2004
39
0
0
Peoria, IL
May 25, 2007
#10
  • May 25, 2007
  • #10
Hooker super comps can work in a 66 with 351, and toploader, and z bar. cant seem to find the part no. rigt now. 62008 or something like that.
 
H

hgufrin

New Member
Mar 15, 2004
39
0
0
Peoria, IL
May 25, 2007
#11
  • May 25, 2007
  • #11
Sorry, 6208's is the correct number
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
222
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Any 1 find any decent blackfriday sales for Foxbody or car stuff?
  • rednotch
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
781
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 19, 2025
rednotch
T
Electrical Brown Connector #31
  • ta66
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
96
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
ta66
T
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
209
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?