• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351W Redline? And some more questions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ares67Coupe
  • Start date Start date Jun 29, 2004
A

Ares67Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
83
0
0
Nor Cal
Jun 29, 2004
#1
  • Jun 29, 2004
  • #1
As so not to hijack Mstng67289's thread. Here we go.

What is the redline of a 351W with the following modifications? Also does any of the below sound fishy or as if something is out of place? Thanks.

1967 Ford Mustang Coupe, 351W, Rebuilt Motor, Rebuilt Heads, Crane Cams Valvetrain, Ported and Polished, Edelbrock Performer Intake, Holley 4BBL Carb, Hedman Shorty Headers, Flowtech Warlock Exhaust, Dual Cutouts w/Custom Turndowns, Fresh Rebuilt T10 4-Speed, and Hurst Competition Shifter. EDIT: Also I am not sure of the CFMs of the Holley 4BBL, but the car did not stumble or miss and pulled extremely strong up to 4500RPMS.

The 351W is a rebuilt stock motor. The crane cam he has in there is the biggest he can fit without having to redo the bottom end. I do not have the cam card or cam specs, but will if I purchase the card when he gives me all of the paperwork for the car. The aforementioned engine was out of a 1979 Ford Van. This is all according to the current owner. He had the rebuild done on both the engine and the heads while the car has been in his possession, he also did the swap from a 302 which the previous owner had in it to the 351W which came out of a van that was at his father's shop waiting to be crushed.

Thanks again,
Chris
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 30, 2004
#2
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #2
6000 rpm's 6500 at the most.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 30, 2004
#3
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #3
It should have spot faces rod, which are generally considered a little tougher.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 30, 2004
#4
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #4
Without cam specs, it's impossible to tell. If you still have press-in studs, I think 6500 is pushin it.
 

mach1one

Boulevard Bruiser
Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
4,775
0
0
Living in the past
Jun 30, 2004
#5
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #5
best bet is to take it to a dyno and see where it quits making power. Anything much past that is running the engine out past where it wants to be.
 
A

Ares67Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
83
0
0
Nor Cal
Jun 30, 2004
#6
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #6
For now I'll work with 6,000, and when a dyno day arrives; I'll take it in and run her through 3 runs and see what comes up. Would it be safe to pull to 7,000 for those 3 runs, or should I stick with 6,500?
 

mach1one

Boulevard Bruiser
Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
4,775
0
0
Living in the past
Jun 30, 2004
#7
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #7
no way I'd run it to 7k, good luck making power past 6k. If the cam is "the biggest he could put in w/o redoing the bottom end" then it's probably not very big. Unless we know the cam specs (or other specs, your description wasn't very, well descriptive )no one can really say an exact number, but I can't really see higher than 6k.
 
A

Ares67Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
83
0
0
Nor Cal
Jun 30, 2004
#8
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #8
Like I said, I won't know cam specs until I get the cam card. I'll see if I can get him to email them to me though. I know it'll help out a lot.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 30, 2004
#9
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #9
This may be obvious to everyone, including the original poster, but one thing bothers me. The question "what is the redline?" has some connotations to me. You could answer this in several ways.

1. What redline would Ford put on the motor in this configuration? Ford would want the thing to last 100k miles minimum. That redline will be conservative compared to the redline a drag racer would put on it, for instance. I don't know what this number is, but someone here should have it. To me this is the true meaning of redline.

2. What is the max rpm that the motor can hit briefly without immediate failure? Hehe, I don't know the answer to this either, but I think the replies have touched on this one.

3. What is the max rpm prior to highly accelerated wear on engine components? Do you want the motor to last 10k miles, 30k miles, or more? I think the answer changes based on this.

4. Where do you make power? Revving the motor over the power band is hard on it, and doesn't improve your e.t. So why do it?

It would be nice if 1 and 4 corresponded with each other. I personally would rather run a motor in the lower rpms that give a higher longevity. Something like 5000-5500 max for a Windsor with stock heads and bottom end (just guessing, the factory numbers may be lower). If you want to go beyond that, you aren't really talking redline, you're just using the motor however you want. There's nothing wrong with it, it's just a deliberate decision that the longevity of your motor is not as important to you as having fun with it.

Have fun.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jun 30, 2004
#10
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #10
We run a late model Ford assembled 351 shortbock in a 93 drag car. It is the sportsman block with truck internals and was assembled on the production line at Ford's engine facility. It has good Victor aluminum heads and a roller cam that is pretty close to .600 lift. We have been shifting this car at 7000-7500 for several years without any problems whatsoever....on a cast crank at that. I think in the current configuration we are shifting it at 7500 and the last time we had it at the track it was on the top end of the track on a 11.3 run when the Tremec splattered during the shift....not the engine.
 
A

Ares67Coupe

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
83
0
0
Nor Cal
Jun 30, 2004
#11
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #11
I would like to go to the point where the engine stops making power, ie the dropoff point, which should be fairly safe for longevity and of course maximum usage of the power band. There is no reason to go any farther than that if you do not see gains from it. Which is why I was asking. However when I pick up the car I'll just have to take it to a dyno and see what the dyno says. Thanks for the help.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 30, 2004
#12
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #12
To me the redline is as far is it will rev. End of story. Too many variables the other way.

If you can get that puppy to 7 grand, I salute you. I ain't picking up what lands on the floor, though.....
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 30, 2004
#13
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #13
Ronstang said:
We run a late model Ford assembled 351 shortbock in a 93 drag car. It is the sportsman block with truck internals and was assembled on the production line at Ford's engine facility. It has good Victor aluminum heads and a roller cam that is pretty close to .600 lift. We have been shifting this car at 7000-7500 for several years without any problems whatsoever....on a cast crank at that. I think in the current configuration we are shifting it at 7500 and the last time we had it at the track it was on the top end of the track on a 11.3 run when the Tremec splattered during the shift....not the engine.
Click to expand...
That's cool, but I'm willing to bet you haven't done 400,000 quarter miles on the motor. How many miles will the motor last treated like that? Is the sportsman block the same as any other Windsor block, or is it specially designed by Ford to be stronger for racing applications? Your heads are not the same as the original posters.

You obviously know a lot more than me about what a motor can and can't do.
I wouldn't argue that it's possible to get a Windsor motor to perform, but I think the results would be a lot different with a 30 year old Windsor with stock heads and bottom end, recent rebuild or not.

So I don't think that information has much bearing on the question at hand.
 

mach1one

Boulevard Bruiser
Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
4,775
0
0
Living in the past
Jun 30, 2004
#14
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #14
redline (from what I always understood) is way past the point of making power and you're now exceeding the safety margins set by the factory (ie, valvetrain starts floating, run the risk of messing bearings, smacking valves, or messing up other important internal engine parts). you should only be worried about the point your car quits making power, bc you will be shifting just a couple hundred rpm past that or right at that point.

Ronstang sounds like he has a nice setup, but w/ a roller cam and alot nicer heads, you can't in anyway compare his engine to yours. Don't expect to see over 6k, I'd be willing to bet it starts going flat closer to 5k.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
New Member: 1978 M II Mach I
  • 351MooseStang
  • May 24, 2019
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 30, 2019
351MooseStang
3
The Towering Inferno (the 1970 Mach 1 Version)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2016
smokin joe
8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
19K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
A
Picking up a 67 Coupe w/351W
  • Ares67Coupe
  • Jun 16, 2004
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
900
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2004
Ares67Coupe
A
Trying to get 400RWHP out of a carbed 351W : TAKE TWO
  • 86T-Top
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 4, 2006
304billet
3
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?