• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

351w with 302 '90 302 internals

  • Thread starter Thread starter jete
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2007
J

jete

New Member
Jul 23, 2006
57
0
0
Lexington Kentucky
Jan 8, 2007
#1
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #1
So I have a 302 and a 351w in my garage. The 351w is a 74' 351w which I heard was the strongest of the strongblocks. So if I took my 302 rolller cam and lifters to a machinest and had them work there magic on my 351w and drill the block into the cam valley what kind of preformance could I expect out of a .030 overbore 351w with a '90 302 roller cam and a nice edlebrock single plain intake? I would be expecting more then 250 hp. Would I be correct in this assumption

(BTW this is with stock 74 351w heads and with stock 90' headers and a stock duraspark ignition system)
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jan 9, 2007
#2
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #2
I wouldn't expect much more than 250 honestly. If you have a 302 and a 351 and you only care to have one of them running however. You are only a crankshaft away from a 393, which is a 3.85 crank, your stock 351 rods, and your stock 302 pistons.

Now you can expect some power
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jan 9, 2007
#3
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #3
jete said:
So I have a 302 and a 351w in my garage. The 351w is a 74' 351w which I heard was the strongest of the strongblocks. So if I took my 302 rolller cam and lifters to a machinest and had them work there magic on my 351w and drill the block into the cam valley what kind of preformance could I expect out of a .030 overbore 351w with a '90 302 roller cam and a nice edlebrock single plain intake? I would be expecting more then 250 hp. Would I be correct in this assumption

(BTW this is with stock 74 351w heads and with stock 90' headers and a stock duraspark ignition system)
Click to expand...

Before you fully assemble the top end do some mock up on the lifters.

It is likely that the oil hole in the lifters will lift out of the lifter bore of that block, if you use a factory type cam.

In order to run a standard 302 cam in that block you will probably need to use 'link bar' conversion lifters (which are pricey).
The alternative, is to use a non-standard cam. A cam grinder can use a smaller base circle when cutting the lobes. this keeps the lifters lower in the bores.
The reduced base cirlce cams are frowned upon though, as they affect valvetrain geometry.

Using flat tappets will eliminate this problem.




jason
 

joncash

just high enough to be functional
Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
756
4
39
The USA's peen
Jan 9, 2007
#4
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #4
What makes a block a "roller block" is not the threaded hole in the lifter valley (although that's part of it), it's the depth of the lifter bores. Roller lifters are longer than flat tappets, and the block is cast with taller lifter bores to compensate.

To use the roller cam out of your 5.0 in a 351W you either have to use a '94 and later 351w block that is set up for a roller cam, or you have to use a special set of lifters.

The conversion lifters have a little metal bar that connects them in pairs to each other and prevents them from turning in the bore and wiping out the cam. They run in the $400 range and are available from Ford Racing, Comp Cams and a few others. (this is the option that I would choose, because it gives you the greatest number of options if you ever want to change the cam in the future)

The last option is to ditch the 5.0 cam and use a roller-conversion camshaft (available from Comp that I know of) made specifically to run hydraulic roller lifters in a block that was not originally designed for them. The difference there is the conversion cam's lobes are ground with a reduced base circle and let the roller lifters sink deeper into their bores. This cam will allow you to tap the holes in the lifter valley and utilize the "spider and dogbone" hardware from a roller 5.0.
 

joncash

just high enough to be functional
Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
756
4
39
The USA's peen
Jan 9, 2007
#5
  • Jan 9, 2007
  • #5
Wow, simultaneous posting...crazy man.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jan 10, 2007
#6
  • Jan 10, 2007
  • #6



How often does that happen???



cool
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
8
Engine 302 block with a 355 stroker, would these internals work in a 351w
  • 89foxjd
  • Oct 1, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 1, 2019
96pushrod
T
302 stepchild needing some valvetrain guidance
  • timdhawk
  • May 7, 2020
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 8, 2020
Enzio
D
Engine rebuild or swap
  • DBegley
  • Jun 10, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 9, 2019
Hack
B
Questions On 351w Heads On 302 Block
  • bhoove40
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2017
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?