• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

393C school me on this motor please

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1991notchbackLX
  • Start date Start date Dec 31, 2009

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Dec 31, 2009
#1
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #1
OK, so it's obviously a stroked 351 Cleveland motor. The motor is a longblock. I do not have much info on it, it will be acquired in a trade. I was told it has 4V heads and is "fully sleeved with valve reliefs." What is the potential of this motor and what should I know about it? What 351W parts are usable on this motor? Is the deck height different from a 351W? Are intake manifolds and headers from 351W usable on a 351C? Thanks in advance.

Chris
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Dec 31, 2009
#2
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #2
anybody out there? did i ask too dumb a question?
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Dec 31, 2009
#3
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #3
IIRC the clevland engine was basically a smallblock motor with big blocks heads, other than that i think power is the same as putting a good set of heads on a 351, oh and had 4 bolt mains and made around 250hp
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Dec 31, 2009
#4
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #4
Thanks, Guy. This is a 393C so I'm assuming the extra displacement with a good flowing top end will allow for some good numbers if I ever decide to use it. The four bolt main thing interests me quite a bit. Does that mean these cleveland blocks can handle big power numbers safely?
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Dec 31, 2009
#5
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #5
I can't think of a single 351W part that will work, even the thermostats are different.

That's a 351C with a stroker crank in it. Sounds like the block has had some serious work done to it if it's been sleeved...that was the hot trick for 351C motors 30 years ago. If it's got early 4V heads on it, it should run like a mofo. If you ask most older gearheads, Clevelands were the only ford motor that would run worth a crap, until the 5.0HO came out.

The nice thing about clevelands is you don't really NEED aftermarket heads to make 450hp, you can dang near fit a golfball in the 4V ports. Technology has caught up with the Windsor motors, but built right, Clevlands are still a force to be reckoned with, heck they have won the Engine Masters Challenge like 5 years in a row now.

Oiling and/or high RPMs are what kill Clevelands....the oiling mods to make them live at very high RPM are very well documented though. Cleve blocks are not QUITE as strong as a 351W block but they are still pretty sturdy.

Edited to add: The #1 internet myth about these things is "you can't build a good street motor with 4V heads" and "4V heads don't make torque". I've seen 4V clevelands that will tow a mountain, win most races, and still be tame enough that your granny could drive it to church.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Dec 31, 2009
#6
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #6
5.0ina66 said:
I can't think of a single 351W part that will work, even the thermostats are different.

That's a 351C with a stroker crank in it. Sounds like the block has had some serious work done to it if it's been sleeved...that was the hot trick for 351C motors 30 years ago. If it's got early 4V heads on it, it should run like a mofo. If you ask most older gearheads, Clevelands were the only ford motor that would run worth a crap, until the 5.0HO came out.

The nice thing about clevelands is you don't really NEED aftermarket heads to make 450hp, you can dang near fit a golfball in the 4V ports. Technology has caught up with the Windsor motors, but built right, Clevlands are still a force to be reckoned with, heck they have won the Engine Masters Challenge like 5 years in a row now.

Oiling and/or high RPMs are what kill Clevelands....the oiling mods to make them live at very high RPM are very well documented though. Cleve blocks are not QUITE as strong as a 351W block but they are still pretty sturdy.

Edited to add: The #1 internet myth about these things is "you can't build a good street motor with 4V heads" and "4V heads don't make torque". I've seen 4V clevelands that will tow a mountain, win most races, and still be tame enough that your granny could drive it to church.
Click to expand...

351w heads and 351c are interchangable with little modifications
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Dec 31, 2009
#7
  • Dec 31, 2009
  • #7
from corral said:
Good luck with your build. with 4v heads try a gear 4.30 or bigger think 4.56 be my first try. was running a 393 cu cleveland in a 70 mach1 run about 10.30s in a 3350 lb car. good luck . see you are va. if need price on strker kit or a build Mark at MME shop in Md.
jim
Click to expand...


Clevelands have been catching my eye lately, they make great power for a pretty reasonable price, that 10.30 in a 3500lb car would be a nine second pass in a light notchback.

Those 4V heads flow a massive ammount of air and those motors like to rev
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jan 1, 2010
#8
  • Jan 1, 2010
  • #8
here's a quote from an email to me from the owner of the long block:

"the cleveland however is the bad bitch. it is a high compression (14:1) race gas motor. It went 9.14 in a backhalfed notch and was built to spray 300 or so at."

it sounds like it should move on the hose...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
T5 conversion questions
  • Animal Lawyer
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Aug 6, 2021
manicmechanic007
J
1995 5.0 (originally v6) WIP... runs good but need input
  • jwk72
  • Feb 10, 2019
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
18
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 20, 2019
Chythar
What It Cost Me To Not Put An Ls In My Fox.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2014
CarMichael Angelo
2015 Ford Mustang Official Intel
  • MRaburn
  • Dec 5, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Dec 5, 2013
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?