• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

4.6 3v cutaway

  • Thread starter Thread starter numenor27
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
Z

Z28x

New Member
Sep 19, 2003
644
0
0
Albany NY
Feb 16, 2004
#41
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #41
THe Cobra R 5.4L was kind of a gas hog too. VVT would help fuel milage. I willing to bet that the Cobra R 5.4L was tuned too agressive for the avg. Joe, based on how mauch gas it uses and the fact that Ford kind of marketed it as a factory Race car. Of couse I'm not really sure of this since I have never driven one of those cars. Maybe someone that knows more about the R's cam timings can help here.
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Feb 17, 2004
#42
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #42
shatner saves said:
Pushrod engines with a single camshaft also makes running multiple valves, cam phasing, or VTEC type systems really difficult.
Click to expand...

Now where did you get that from? Large turbodiesels that can benefit from it have four valves running off a single camshaft. Two valves wee used on the 5.0 because it maximizes cylinder swirl and inertial supercharging for torque, not to mention how much stronger the heads are without pecking all those damn holes in it, not because they just couldn't get four valves in the head.

Variable cam timing could be pulled off much more efficiently on an overhead valve motor, because there is only one camshaft to fool with.

And VTEC on a Ford motor... sheesh. Have a seat.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Feb 17, 2004
#43
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #43
Ray III said:
And VTEC on a Ford motor... sheesh. Have a seat.
Click to expand...

For the 37th time: The Ford VVT system is NOT like Vtec system. Vtec varies the lift, the Ford VVT varies the cam timing relative to the crank.
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Feb 17, 2004
#44
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #44
I heard about the valve solenoids a couple years back. Not something I would put in MY motor because it relies on electricity and we all know how much we can depend on things that need wires to operate. In addition they still have some serious obstacles to overcome like how to cushion the valve seating. Camshafts will move the valve with a specific amount of velocity with respect to its position, and (assuming the springs are strong enough to defeat float) will ALWAYS set the valve down gently on its seat regardless of whether you rev the holy piss out of it. Solenoid valves just pop open and then SLAM back onto the seat...
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Feb 17, 2004
#45
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #45
351CJ said:
For the 37th time: The Ford VVT system is NOT like Vtec system. Vtec varies the lift, the Ford VVT varies the cam timing relative to the crank.
Click to expand...

Read the guy's post. It wasn't MY idea.
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Feb 17, 2004
#46
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #46
Ray III said:
Now where did you get that from? Large turbodiesels that can benefit from it have four valves running off a single camshaft. Two valves wee used on the 5.0 because it maximizes cylinder swirl and inertial supercharging for torque, not to mention how much stronger the heads are without pecking all those damn holes in it, not because they just couldn't get four valves in the head.

Variable cam timing could be pulled off much more efficiently on an overhead valve motor, because there is only one camshaft to fool with.

And VTEC on a Ford motor... sheesh. Have a seat.
Click to expand...

Exactly what do you mean by "large turbo diesels"? There are gigantic marine 2 stroke diesels running 4 valves per cylinder and those things redline at a stratospheric 150 to 200 RPM. Highway tractors are around 2100 to (maybe) 2500 rpm. I'm pretty sure that the highest revving light truck diesel still has a redline of, I dunno, 4000 RPM? Reciprocating mass and high rpm stability isn't exactly an issue with these engines. And by the way, GM's 7800 duramax commercial truck engine is an overhead cam design.

GM has always maintained the reason they stuck with cam-in-block, 2 valve designs is that they are more robust, more economical, simpler and are still very effective in large engine designs. I agree entirely. However, I look at the cutaway of the 3 valve vortec truck engine, then the 3 valve mustang engine, do a parts/cost/weight/simplicity inventory in my head, and I really don't see any clear advantage. If someone can explain it to me, be my guest.

And I said "VTEC type systems" not "VTEC." Sorry I couldn't remember off hand what the trade name porsche, toyota , BMW or anyone else is using for their variable lift valvetrain geometry.

Not to single anyone out, but some of the anti-Honda sentiment on this board is getting downright Freudian IMO.

Clown.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Feb 18, 2004
#47
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #47
Ray III said:
Read the guy's post. It wasn't MY idea.
Click to expand...

Sorry, it was getting late, I was tired and I forgot that the software on this forum does not re-post the original quote.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Feb 18, 2004
#48
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #48
shatner saves said:
And I said "VTEC type systems" not "VTEC." Sorry I couldn't remember off hand what the trade name porsche, toyota , BMW or anyone else is using for their variable lift valvetrain geometry.
Click to expand...

BMW does not use variable lift, they use variable timing. Once again Ford doest NOT vary lift, only timing. BMW's name is VANOS or in the case of their engines that vary both the intake and exhuast timing, independently, it is called Duo-Vanos.

"Vtec like" would correctly refer to systems with variable lift.

"Vanos like" would correctly refer to systems with variable timing.

Although BMW gets the hype, I think Porsche had variable timing before BMW did. I don't remember what their trade name is though.
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Feb 18, 2004
#49
  • Feb 18, 2004
  • #49
351CJ said:
BMW does not use variable lift, they use variable timing. Once again Ford doest NOT vary lift, only timing. BMW's name is VANOS or in the case of their engines that vary both the intake and exhuast timing, independently, it is called Duo-Vanos.

"Vtec like" would correctly refer to systems with variable lift.

"Vanos like" would correctly refer to systems with variable timing.

Although BMW gets the hype, I think Porsche had variable timing before BMW did. I don't remember what their trade name is though.
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact, BMW does do a variable lift on their 745 (V8) and 760 (V12) called "valvtronic". These cars also have dual vanos and variable length intake runners. BMW's system is unique because valve lift is steplessly variable. I think it works by altering the cam follower lever ratio. Crazy stuff.

Porsche's system is called "VarioCam Plus", which alters cam timing and valve lift. Like VTEC, it alternates between two different cam profiles.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Feb 21, 2004
#50
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #50
Putting the VVT on a Cobra R engine could have some amazing results. Remember, that's a DOHC engine. Being able to change the timing on the camshafts on a DOHC engine will allow you to control the intake and exhaust timing SEPARATELY, not just one general shift. This then leads into being able to control the valve overlap, which is like changing one aspect of the camshaft profile.

Individually cam phasing a DOHC engine can give some very impressive gains into the torque curve. I think that one make one seriously badass engine.
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Feb 21, 2004
#51
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #51
shatner saves said:
As a matter of fact, BMW does do a variable lift on their 745 (V8) and 760 (V12) called "valvtronic". These cars also have dual vanos and variable length intake runners. BMW's system is unique because valve lift is steplessly variable. I think it works by altering the cam follower lever ratio. Crazy stuff.

Porsche's system is called "VarioCam Plus", which alters cam timing and valve lift. Like VTEC, it alternates between two different cam profiles.
Click to expand...
Valvetronic is cool, those cars don't have a throttle! The infinitely varible valve lift/duration handles all intake metering.
I thought the new mustang had some system where it actualy moved the whole cam (both of them) to vary the valve lift
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Feb 22, 2004
#52
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #52
They also give an amazing combo of fuel economy and acceleration for a car that size/weight.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Feb 22, 2004
#53
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #53
GinoGT said:
Putting the VVT on a Cobra R engine could have some amazing results. Remember, that's a DOHC engine. Being able to change the timing on the camshafts on a DOHC engine will allow you to control the intake and exhaust timing SEPARATELY, not just one general shift. This then leads into being able to control the valve overlap, which is like changing one aspect of the camshaft profile.

Individually cam phasing a DOHC engine can give some very impressive gains into the torque curve. I think that one make one seriously badass engine.
Click to expand...

Ford does not yet have a VVT system that does this. The Lincoln LS / T-Bird system varies only the intake cam timing - the exhaust cams are fixed.

But you have pointed out one of the major advantages of DOHC heads vs SOHC heads. That is, as you have pointed out with DOHC you can vary the intake and exhuast valve timing independently.

Time for Ford to get with the program and put this type of VVT in the 32 V mod motors.
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Feb 22, 2004
#54
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #54
351CJ said:
Ford does not yet have a VVT system that does this. The Lincoln LS / T-Bird system varies only the intake cam timing - the exhaust cams are fixed.

But you have pointed out one of the major advantages of DOHC heads vs SOHC heads. That is, as you have pointed out with DOHC you can vary the intake and exhuast valve timing independently.

Time for Ford to get with the program and put this type of VVT in the 32 V mod motors.
Click to expand...

That would be the ultimate. I wonder; a 4.6, DOHC 4v, VVT on intake and exhaust cams, charge motion control and 11:1 compression. That thing would be lighter than the current 5.4, make an easy 400hp and probably get really good fuel economy as well.

Although, you might be able to get a lot of that advantage with a DOHC, VVT, 3 valve motor.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Feb 22, 2004
#55
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #55
Might as well make it a 4V if you're going to put 4 cams in the engine.
 
S

shatner saves

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
583
0
0
Feb 22, 2004
#56
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #56
http://www.sae.org/automag/techbriefs/09-2003/1-111-9-26.pdf

Here is an article on GM's 3 valve head (pages 5 & 6). They claim the next Z06 engine will be 6.3 litres and "rev safely to 7000 rpm". Maybe if they do Ti valves and connecting rods and even then, I'll believe it when I see it.

Page 9 has an article on Lotus/Eaton solenoid valves.

For those of you with dial-up, it'll take a while to load.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
07 with tune removed
  • wrongguy
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
366
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 27, 2025
wrongguy
W
J
2004 mustang 4.6 timing cover
  • jk66
  • Jun 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
112
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 30, 2026
Noobz347
WTB 4.6 2v Bullitt
  • Malala
  • Dec 6, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
0
Views
127
Want to Buy Dec 6, 2025
Malala
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
279
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
3
Engine build
  • 3vbeto
  • May 20, 2024
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
457
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 21, 2024
Dino Dino Bambino
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?