• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

4 cyl dual exaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter spunky4343
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
May 11, 2004
#41
  • May 11, 2004
  • #41
Save the money and get a large NPR it kicks the Volvo's A$$ and mounts exactly the same plus you will like it a lot better. You can argue that you dont have a FMIC now so you wont know the difference but it is your money.

I have dual 40 seires on my N/A love them 2.5. It just looks good. When I swap the turbo in I am going to go 3 in DP into my single 3 in cat and into my existing Y out to the same 40 seires til they go bad then I will go to a different muffler. Heck I am cheap too I will run them till they break.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 11, 2004
#42
  • May 11, 2004
  • #42
i4power said:
I'm thinking of running a muffler with a 3" in, and dual 2.5" out. That way, I don't have to get a y-pipe, and two mufflers. I'm not sure if this will work in terms of it's location though.
Click to expand...

This is what I have...just a little FYI though, you'll have to find a skilled exhaust guy to make you the custom tailpipes needed to do this, it's a pretty tight (actually damn tight) fit. It took me a few tries to get it right.
 
K

ka0tyk

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
1,610
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
May 11, 2004
#43
  • May 11, 2004
  • #43


http://mail.j0o.com:8000/misc/ka0tyk.mp3

pacesetter header, 3" to y-pipe, 2.5" to dual spintech mufflers, then out to 3" stainless steel tips...
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 11, 2004
#44
  • May 11, 2004
  • #44
Is that 2" or 2.25" tailpipes? I see it was expanded to fit the 2.5" mufflers.
 
K

ka0tyk

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
1,610
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
May 11, 2004
#45
  • May 11, 2004
  • #45
Stinger said:
Is that 2" or 2.25" tailpipes? I see it was expanded to fit the 2.5" mufflers.
Click to expand...

oops... 2.25 after the mufflers... brain fart.
 

Lex

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2004
248
0
16
Halifax NS. Canada
May 11, 2004
#46
  • May 11, 2004
  • #46
Ok , this is just a dumb ass question to just drag this thread on and on and on and..... well you know. But if someone is going to go out and spend the money on a y-pipe, another muffler and pipe to get better performance not to mention more maintence and repair costs for the future, shouldn't they also rip out the stock manifold and replace it with perhaps a ranger header (or custom header for the mustang 2.3)?? I just see the manifold being the bottleneck to gain performance. Myself I guess I don't feel having dual exhaust will impress anyone when you have to tell them that theres a 2.3 under the hood. . But I agree it LOOKS cooler
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
May 11, 2004
#47
  • May 11, 2004
  • #47
Stinger said:
This is what I have...just a little FYI though, you'll have to find a skilled exhaust guy to make you the custom tailpipes needed to do this, it's a pretty tight (actually damn tight) fit. It took me a few tries to get it right.
Click to expand...

OK that's promising. I'll check out your site for some pics.

EDIT: Damn, no pics. You got any, Stinger? Just want to get an idea of HOW tight it is.
 

Keasbey

Member
Jun 12, 2003
915
0
16
Montreal
May 11, 2004
#48
  • May 11, 2004
  • #48
Asha'man said:
Okay, I've raced, but only as a joke. I can't beat anything on the road that will race me, so I don't even bother.
Ash
Click to expand...

Hey! don't say that.. I have a 2.3 87 auto, and I've beat a 89 manual ranger that was dual plug ..

And my car is stock.. except for the timing and for the muffler..
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 11, 2004
#49
  • May 11, 2004
  • #49
i4power said:
OK that's promising. I'll check out your site for some pics.

EDIT: Damn, no pics. You got any, Stinger? Just want to get an idea of HOW tight it is.
Click to expand...

It is TIGHT, trust me...you know how they were saying a single 3" is a tight fit...think of how much bigger TWO 2.5" pipes in the same area is.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
513
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
314
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
C
Fox A4LD Install Issues, Crank from Solenoid, No Start
  • Crabpocalypse
  • Oct 28, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
812
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 9, 2024
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
923
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
Rebuilt 5.0 - blow by, how much is too much….
  • RockOn
  • Apr 10, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2023
RockOn
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?