• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

408w Timing

  • Thread starter Thread starter js66coupe
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Jul 4, 2013
#1
  • Jul 4, 2013
  • #1
I have a 408W with AFR 205 heads, an FTI cam, Vic Jr intake, custom carb, etc. Someone recommended that I run my distributor (MSD) with the timing locked out as it would improve performance even though the car is primarily street driven. Anyone run their distributor with the timing locked out and how has the performance been.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jul 5, 2013
#2
  • Jul 5, 2013
  • #2
js66coupe said:
I have a 408W with AFR 205 heads, an FTI cam, Vic Jr intake, custom carb, etc. Someone recommended that I run my distributor (MSD) with the timing locked out as it would improve performance even though the car is primarily street driven. Anyone run their distributor with the timing locked out and how has the performance been.
Click to expand...

I too have heard the same and have considered trying it.

My concerns are that I have 11.1:1 compression (205psi static compression) and needed to purchase an aftermarket starter to turn the motor over reliably when it is warm with 14 degrees initial timing. The plugs show light borderline specks, but that is after racing hard down the track. I built it for pump gas 93 octane as I don't want to use race gas.

Adding a start retard module should help in most cases. My MSD ignition system offers a 20 degree retard setup which could put me back to 12-14 degrees area during cranking with the 33 degree total timing that I run.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 5, 2013
#3
  • Jul 5, 2013
  • #3
my advice would be to run ten advance in the distributor, and 10-12 initial timing. that would give you 30 to 32 total timing, and if you have that all in by 3000rpm, you will probably have the best performance curve you can get.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Jul 6, 2013
#4
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #4
I run mine locked out, 30 on pump and 34 on race gas. Mine is 12.7:1 ( I also run water/meth, but that doesn't come on until about 3K). Mine was actually way harder to start when I put a retard program into the MSD box (I think I pulled 20 degrees out), and I have heard this from numerous others. I had originally bought the programmable box just for that purpose (I've since upgraded to a different programmable box and now have timing set at 34 and the box pulls it to 30 for the street). I do run a power master starter. The motor does turn slightly slower when hot. Though I generally start the car with two hands, push the starter button to get the motor spinning then throw on the ignition and that fixes the problem. My car has yet to see the track (to busy with work), but is a race oriented motor. Seems most SBFs like between 30 and 34 degrees.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 6, 2013
#5
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #5
I'm puzzled as to how an engine that has varying timing requirements in operation could see a performance improvement with locked timing.

My vote is to keep some sort of an advance curve.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Jul 6, 2013
#6
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #6
Not sure of the science, I would have to think about it. I think it is going to have to do with the ideal timing for the maximum performance of the engine. Many people do it on race oriented motors. My idle and throttle response is great.

Here is a speedtalk post http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21986 ; a couple post speak of the why, and also has opposing opinions. again, I haven't really try to think it out but it works on my car and numerous other people I know.

To the OP, since you have an FTI cam ask Ed.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 6, 2013
#7
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #7
Ours is locked out also. 12-1 compression with afr 205's. 30 degrees total.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 6, 2013
#8
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #8
mtaqua said:
Not sure of the science, I would have to think about it. I think it is going to have to do with the ideal timing for the maximum performance of the engine. Many people do it on race oriented motors. My idle and throttle response is great.

Here is a speedtalk post http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21986 ; a couple post speak of the why, and also has opposing opinions. again, I haven't really try to think it out but it works on my car and numerous other people I know.
Click to expand...

And then you have a long-winded guy trying to convince everyone that locked-out timing pulls air in through the exhaust and makes the engine run better regardless of exhaust length and, additionally, that experience of result trumps understanding of reason.

The timing requirement of an engine is dependent on many factors, but it is never the same for all combinations of load and engine speed. Locked timing will sacrifice something somewhere in the curve.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Jul 6, 2013
#9
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #9
yeah, I saw that too. I don't disagree that there are sacrifices, but there are gains to be had too. I am not sure that you can get the curve right either, the number of variables is pretty high. I would think factory engines take into account as many as they can and do a pretty good job of getting the curve right. You can go test for best timing on a dyno, or at the track when the motor is no longer factory. I guess it depends what you are trying to do. The OP was asking about performance benefits, just informing him of what I've done and numerous others with race oriented motors (and not the guy who feeds his motor through the exhaust). Sorry I don't have any back to back testing, and my car is far from typical.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Jul 6, 2013
#10
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #10
we run about 36* locked out on the 410 my buddy and I just built. around 14:1 compression and it starts fine. it runs vp 112 for fuel.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jul 6, 2013
#11
  • Jul 6, 2013
  • #11
I have always been, and remain a believer that a street driven car needs the vacuum advance for better part throttle conditions. Locked out timing on a race car that is at WOT all the time makes perfect sense.
 
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Jul 7, 2013
#12
  • Jul 7, 2013
  • #12
Thank you for the information. I only have about 200 miles on the motor but I believe I have a timing issue as the motor "breaks up" at certain RPMs and seems down on power. I'm going to get it dyno tuned so we'll see where I end up, locked out timing or not.

Also, no vacuum advance on the distributor so that's not an option. Anyway, the FTI cam I have installed doesn't really allow the engine to pull much vacuum.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 7, 2013
#13
  • Jul 7, 2013
  • #13
65ShelbyClone said:
I'm puzzled as to how an engine that has varying timing requirements in operation could see a performance improvement with locked timing.

My vote is to keep some sort of an advance curve.
Click to expand...

some engines are designed to have the mechanical advance locked out, and just use either a load based advance system, aka vacuum advance, or are race only engines that see a very narrow rpm band and thus dont need mechanical advance so it becomes just one more thing that can break and cause issues. a friend of mine used to have a 79 cadillac with the 425 engine, and it used a locked out mechanical advance, and just had the vacuum only advance. it was done for emissions and fuel economy. and given that cadillac owners at the time didnt really care about performance, it worked just fine for them.
 

BuckeyeDemon

Member
Apr 13, 2010
130
9
19
Cincinnati, OH
Jul 7, 2013
#14
  • Jul 7, 2013
  • #14
adding timing will help increase vacuum.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Jul 7, 2013
#15
  • Jul 7, 2013
  • #15
ive always had good luck running timing locked out. i go with what makes them fastest at the track. everyone wants a different amount of total, but they always seem to run better locked out. its a tuning tool. some may respond different depending on the combination.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 8, 2013
#16
  • Jul 8, 2013
  • #16
woodsnake said:
I have always been, and remain a believer that a street driven car needs the vacuum advance for better part throttle conditions. Locked out timing on a race car that is at WOT all the time makes perfect sense.
Click to expand...

Our Shelby is not a race car and drives great with locked timing. Same with our Pantera. Then again its not a stockish motor so I guess you wouldn't notice the little bit you may give up.

My 65 is efi so the timing is all over the place and is a street car/race deal. Opposite of your statement. LOL
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Jul 8, 2013
#17
  • Jul 8, 2013
  • #17
js66coupe said:
Thank you for the information. I only have about 200 miles on the motor but I believe I have a timing issue as the motor "breaks up" at certain RPMs and seems down on power. I'm going to get it dyno tuned so we'll see where I end up, locked out timing or not.

Also, no vacuum advance on the distributor so that's not an option. Anyway, the FTI cam I have installed doesn't really allow the engine to pull much vacuum.
Click to expand...

break up could be with your ignition box, my box went out (and I used this as an excuse to upgrade). You can get them rebuilt.
 
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Oct 4, 2013
#18
  • Oct 4, 2013
  • #18
DYNO RESULTS...We dyno'ed my car today. Its a 408W with AFR 205 heads and FTI HR cam through a C6 Trans. First pull was 391RWHP. We then setup the MSD distributor to run the timing "locked out" with total advance around 31 degrees, no start retard. Cranked right up, no issues and pulled 411 RWHP corrected, 406 Torque. Peak torque at 4500 RPMs and peak HP about 5900 RPMS. So, I picked up about 20 HP by moving to locked out timing. Street manners is good. Better throttle response too.
 

BuckeyeDemon

Member
Apr 13, 2010
130
9
19
Cincinnati, OH
Oct 5, 2013
#19
  • Oct 5, 2013
  • #19
js66coupe said:
DYNO RESULTS...We dyno'ed my car today. Its a 408W with AFR 205 heads and FTI HR cam through a C6 Trans. First pull was 391RWHP. We then setup the MSD distributor to run the timing "locked out" with total advance around 31 degrees, no start retard. Cranked right up, no issues and pulled 411 RWHP corrected, 406 Torque. Peak torque at 4500 RPMs and peak HP about 5900 RPMS. So, I picked up about 20 HP by moving to locked out timing. Street manners is good. Better throttle response too.
Click to expand...

can you provide the two dyno sheets for those runs?

was the total timing the same for both runs?

did you do multiple runs with each configuration to ensure there was no anomaly?

was the car colder (i.e. rear end temps, transmission temps, etc) on the non-locked out runs?

how much did the environmental conditions change between the two tests highlighted (yes, i know the correction factors are supposed to account for these changes)? did they continually update the environmental conditions for each test?

you explicitly wrote 411 RWHP corrected for the locked out case and you didn't mention the 391RWHP being corrected. Is there a reason you highlighted that or were both runs corrected?
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Oct 11, 2013
#20
  • Oct 11, 2013
  • #20
yeah, 20 is a significant jump, I would think you had something wrong of different
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
673
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
200
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?